1 / 10

Joint meeting of the Subsidiary Body and Consultative Body for the 2013 cycle

Joint meeting of the Subsidiary Body and Consultative Body for the 2013 cycle. 4 and 5 April 2013 Room XI, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (paraphrased): A response is provided in each and every section; Maximum word counts are respected;

brac
Download Presentation

Joint meeting of the Subsidiary Body and Consultative Body for the 2013 cycle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint meeting of the Subsidiary Body and Consultative Body for the 2013 cycle 4 and 5 April 2013 Room XI, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  2. Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (paraphrased): A response is provided in each and every section; Maximum word counts are respected; Evidence of free, prior and informed consent in English or French, as well as the language of the community; Evidence of inclusion in an inventory (may be a functioning hyperlink); Edited video of not more than ten minutes is provided, subtitled in English or French. What is technical assessment?

  3. 7.COM and previous Committeesalso adopted several instructions to States that are not technically disqualifying but are subject to the assessment of CB or SB, e.g.: Avoid inappropriate language Demonstrate mutual respect Avoid copy-and-paste Provide information in proper place Describe nature, characteristics of inventory Etc. What requirements are not part of technical assessment?

  4. Transversal issues • Created for second Subsidiary Body in 2010; updated annually since • Evaluators found that certain issues arose for multiple nominations; they wished to apply consistent responses to recurrent situations • Sometimes, one evaluator had a position in several written evaluations that was not shared by the body; such outlying positions could be resolved for multiple files at once

  5. Transversal issues • Transversal issues fed ‘part C’ of the reports and became advice to submitting States • After advising the same thing several times, SB and/or CB proposed they figure as decisions of the Committee, rather than simple advice • Committee Members themselves also identified issues transcending any single nomination that they wished to formulate as advice or requirements for submitting States • Constitutes a vade mecumof the emerging jurisprudence of the Convention

  6. Contents and structure of the document • Working methods, principles and technical characteristics • Criteria – Urgent Safeguarding and Representative Lists, Best Safeguarding Practices and International Assistance • Cross-border elements, multinational nominations and other topics Most of the document refers to the criteria and how they have been interpreted

  7. Technical characteristics

  8. Criterion U.5/R.5 (for example)

More Related