50 likes | 121 Views
The current state of draft media loopback-18 includes addressing 71 comments from the working group last call, covering both editorial and technical aspects. Draft-17 was uploaded recently, addressing editorial comments, while draft-18, uploaded Sunday, addressed most technical comments. However, some technical comments remain unresolved, needing further discussion. Not all technical comments translate to document changes but may involve actions for the Working Group Chairs. The removal of the codec type list from loopback-source/loopback-mirror attributes signifies a significant technical change. The next steps involve deciding whether to issue another working group last call immediately or wait two weeks before doing so.
E N D
One more loop for loopback draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-18
Current State of Draft • 71 comments were received in WGLC • 34 Editorial, 37 Technical • Draft-17 was uploaded 2 weeks ago, which covered the 34 editorial comments from WGLC • Draft-18 was uploaded Sunday, which covered almost all of the 37 technical comments • Use tools page to view diffs from draft-17
What wasn’t resolved? • Some technical comments were not document changes: • Example: “needs to reviewed by the ietf-types@iana.org mailing list” • Some are actions for WG Chairs (?) • Example: “reduce # of authors” • I am only the current editor – do I do the above?
Big changes • I believe the biggest technical change was removing the codec type list from the loopback-source/loopback-mirror attributes • I.e., from this: a=loopback-source:0 8 • To this: a=loopback-source
Next steps Issue another WGLC now, or wait two more weeks and issue one then?