chapter 5 lecture poverty inequality and development n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Chapter 5 Lecture -Poverty, Inequality, and Development PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Chapter 5 Lecture -Poverty, Inequality, and Development

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 40

Chapter 5 Lecture -Poverty, Inequality, and Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 459 Views
  • Uploaded on

Chapter 5 Lecture -Poverty, Inequality, and Development. EC348 - Development Economics. Sapa, Vietnam *Dennis C. McCornac. Distribution and Development: Seven Critical Questions. What is the extent of relative inequality, and how is this related to the extent of poverty?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Chapter 5 Lecture -Poverty, Inequality, and Development


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. Chapter 5 Lecture -Poverty, Inequality, and Development EC348 - Development Economics Sapa, Vietnam *Dennis C. McCornac

    2. Distribution and Development: Seven Critical Questions What is the extent of relative inequality, and how is this related to the extent of poverty? Who are the poor and what are their economics characteristics? Who benefits from economic growth? Does rapid growth necessarily cause greater income inequality? Do the poor benefit from growth? Are high levels of inequality always bad? What policies can reduce poverty?

    3. Issues • Development and growth is often discussed as if the population of a given country enjoyed the same rate of change in income • This is certainly not true: there is inequality among the citizens of any given country  some people earn a higher share of national income than other people • Given that there is inequality, is it still true that, when a country grows, all the population benefits from it? • To be able to answer this question, we have to analyze how inequality and poverty change as a country grows

    4. Economic growth is necessary, but not sufficient, to improve the living standards of the whole population: • If a country is too poor, even redistributing all income in order to have a perfectly egalitarian income distribution, everybody will still be poor (case of Vietnam in 1980’s) • But a country may grow, and income distribution may become so unequal, that the number of people with low living standards may actually increase • Growth may be associated with worsening of the income distribution when: • The relatively well-off get most of the benefits of increased income (“the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer”)

    5. (Con’t) Growth may be associated with worsening of the income distribution when: • Government forces savings to further increase growth, thus reducing consumption and welfare • Government uses increased income in projects that do not reflect directly into benefits for citizens (several less-developed countries have well-armed military, nuclear weapons, palaces, etc.) • Recent evidence suggests growth is actually good for the poor • When data across countries is examined, it can be seen that the income of the 20% poorest of the population tends to grow together with average • When growth rate increases, income of the poor also grows faster

    6. Measures of Inequality • To discuss these issues in more detail, we have to be able to measure inequality • And to measure inequality, we must have a precise definition. • Inequality can be measured in several different ways, and each different way may be the most appropriate for a particular kind of analysis • Measures of inequality are based on how the average income of a given country is distributed across its population • To obtain a measure of inequality, we need information of income for each single individual in the country, or for a “sample” of individuals • This information is usually obtained via household surveys. How?

    7. Lorenz Curve • The Gini coefficient is the ratio of the areas A/(A+B) in the figure above

    8. To summarize inequality in a single number, some statistics were developed. • The most popular one is the Gini coefficient • The ratio of the areas A/(A+B) • Larger Gini coefficient means larger inequality (note that the coefficient is between 0 and 1) • Keep in mind, however, sometimes the value is based on 100 point scale. • Another popular approach is to compare the income of different fractions of the population; for example: ratio between income of the 20% richest and income of the 20% poorest http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTPA/0,,contentMDK:20238991~menuPK:492138~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:430367,00.html

    9. “Textbook Lorenz Curve” • BD - If the income distribution in a given country was completely egalitarian • So, any deviation from the 45o line is due to inequality in the distribution

    10. Lorenz Curve of Income Distribution https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html

    11. Functional Income Distribution • Assume a traditional economy in which labor is the only variable input (capital and land are fixed): Output = Wages + Profits • Functional income distribution = Wages as a percentage of Profits • The higher the ratio, the greater is income equality

    12. Absolute Poverty and Poverty Gap • Definition for Absolute Poverty: The poverty threshold, or poverty line, is the minimum level of income deemed necessary to achieve an adequate standard of living in a given country • International Poverty Line: The common international poverty line has in the past been roughly $1 a day. In 2008, the World Bank came out with a revised figure of $1.25 at 2005 purchasing-power parity (PPP).

    13. Measuring Poverty Gap • Poverty and income inequality depend on type of economic, political and institutional arrangements according to which rising national incomes are distributed among broad segments of a population • A middle-income country may have a higher poverty rate and poverty gap than a low-income country (South Africa vs. Sri Lanka)

    14. Measuring Inequality and Poverty Headcount Index: H/N Where H is the number of persons who are poor and N is the total number of people in the economy Total poverty gap: Where Yp is the absolute poverty line; and Yi the income of the ith poor person

    15. Measuring Total Poverty Gap

    16. The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) Identification of poverty status through a dual cutoff: First, cutoff levels within each dimension (analogous to falling below a poverty line for example $1.25 per day for income poverty); Second, cutoff in the number of dimensions in which a person must be deprived (below a line) to be deemed multidimensionally poor. MPI focuses on deprivations in health, education, and standard of living; and each receives equal (that is one-third of the overall total) weight.

    17. MPI Indicators Health - two indicators with equal weight - whether any child has died in the family, and whether any adult or child in the family is malnourished –weighted equally (each counts as one-sixth toward the maximum deprivation in the MPI) Education - two indicators with equal weight - whether no household member completed 5 years of schooling, and whether any school-aged child is out of school for grades 1 through 8 (each counts one-sixth toward the MPI). Standard of Living, equal weight on 6 deprivations (each counts as 1/18 toward the maximum): lack of electricity; insufficiently safe drinking water; inadequate sanitation; inadequate flooring; unimproved cooking fuel; lack of more than one of 5 assets – telephone, radio, TV, bicycle, and motorbike.

    18. MPI Rankings and Poverty Headcounts for Selected Countries

    19. Multidimensional Poverty Tells a Different Story Than Income Poverty The results showed that knowing income poverty is not enough if our concern is with multidimensional poverty. Multidimensionally, Bangladesh is substantially less poor - but Pakistan substantially poorer - than would be predicted by income poverty Ethiopia is far more multidimensionally poor, and Tanzania much less so, than predicted by income poverty. Most Latin American countries e.g. Brazil rank worse on multidimensional poverty than on income poverty; but Colombia’s income and MPI poverty ranks are about same.

    20. Lorenz Curve of Income Distribution Improved Income Distribution Worsening Income Distribution The greater the curvature of the Lorenz Curve, the greater is the degree of income inequality Crossing Lorenz Curves in the Modern-Sector Enlargement Growth Typology

    21. Efficiency versus Equality • Some degree of inequality is due to the fact that different people have different levels of ability • Also, some degree of inequality is necessary to generate incentives in the market  this is the way to make people work hard, or to give right incentives for creative people to innovate • Policies that try to reduce this type of inequality tend to reduce the efficiency in terms of allocation of resources • What is the ideal point in terms of the ‘efficiency versus equality’ tradeoff? Explain.

    22. Growth and Distribution The “Inverted-U” Kuznets Curve • Income inequality increases during the early stages of growth • Income equality increases during a later stage of growth with redistribution of income and wealth

    23. The Kuznets Curve • Cross country evidence supports the hypothesis • Time series data show some countries have been able to grow and improve income distribution at the same time

    24. Explaining the Kuznets Curve • The idea comes from the a two sector (agriculture and industry) model. • Initially, with all population in rural areas: development is low and there is no inequality (the whole society is poor) • Intermediary stage: part of the population migrates to urban areas, where wages are higher  inequality rises with first steps of industrialization • Final stage: most of the population lives in urban areas, and wages in agriculture become higher  further development brings reductions in inequality

    25. Further Explaining the Kuznets Curve • Initially, a relatively small fraction of the population would benefit from development  increased inequality • After modernization was spread out through society, inequality would be reduced • In the end, the economy would move from a situation of poverty with low inequality, to a situation of development with low inequality; the increase and reduction in inequality would be the transition between these two points Evidence on this idea is suspect

    26. Nowadays, the dominant view is that there is no clear relation between development and inequality (across countries or though time), although not all economist agree • Nevertheless, changes that a country goes through during the development process may affect inequality • In the short run, inequality tends to be very persistent within a country • Changes in inequality are generally small when compared to changes in other economic variables (income, urbanization, etc) • Why is Inequality Persistent?

    27. Inequality Depends on Factors that are Persistent Through Time • Inequality in access to education and credit (entrepreneurship) • Culture and social structures associated with discrimination • Inequality in political representation • Intergenerational transmission of inequality via fertility and educational decisions (poor people tend to have more kids and invest less in each).

    28. Consequences of Inequality • Apart from welfare concerns, inequality also has direct economic consequences • Inequality tends to increase crime (economic theory of crime)  material costs of crime are around 4% of GDP for the US; and probably more for Latin America and ex-USSR • Inequality may affect policy-making, if income is related to political power  more influence to the richer

    29. Income and Inequality in Selected Countries

    30. People Living in Poverty http://www.ifad.org/rpr2011/images/maps/index.htm

    31. Food for Thought The world's seven richest men could wipe out global poverty By Anuradha Vittachi,12 June 1997,London, UK The world's seven richest men could wipe out global poverty. Their combined wealth is more than enough to provide the basic needs of the poorest quarter of the world's people. According to the UN's 1997 Human Development Report (HDR), published today, it would cost just $80 billion to provide access to basic social services and income transfers to the poverty-stricken - less than the net wealth of these seven billionaires. In fact, the top ten billionaires have 1.5 times as much money as the combined national incomes of the 48 poorest countries, home to 10 % of the world's people. Do you think this has changed over the past decade and a half?

    32. Not Enough Food for Thought “Poor nutrition is implicated in more than half of all child deaths worldwide—a proportion unmatched by any infectious disease since the Black Death,” says Jean-Louis Sarbib, Senior Vice President for Human Development at the World Bank. “It is intimately linked with poor health and environmental factors and yet, policymakers, politicians, and economists often fail to recognize these connections. For example, nearly 60% of children who die of common diseases like diarrhea and malaria could have ultimately survived had they not been malnourished in the first place.” http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20839585~pagePK:64257043~piPK:437376~theSitePK:4607,00.html

    33. Characteristics of Poverty Groups • Rural population • Women and children • Ethnic minorities and indigenous population

    34. Problems of Gender Relations in Developing Countries: Voices of the Poor Sister, if you don’t beat them, they’ll stop being good. And if they’re good and you beat them, they’ll stay that way. — A man in Bangladesh When my husband died, my in- laws told me to get out. So I came to town and slept on the pave-ment. — A middle- aged widow in Kenya Problems have affected our relationship. The day my husband brings in money, we are all right together. The day he stays at home [ out of work], we are fighting constantly. — A woman from El Gawaber, Egypt The unemployed men are frustrated because they can no longer play the part of family providers and protectors. They live on the money made by their wives and feel humiliated because of this. — An elderly woman from Uchkun, Kyrgyzstan When a a woman gives her opinion, they [ men] make fun of her and don’t pay attention. If women go to a meeting, they don’t give their opinion. — A woman in Las Pascuas, Bolivia

    35. The Range of Policy Options: Some Basic Considerations • Areas of intervention • Change the functional distribution • Give more income to labor and less to capital. • Change asset and skill inequality: the sources of income inequality. • Land reform; microcredit; basic education • Make taxes more progressive. • Poverty reduction programs: direct transfers or subsidies for food, education, health, etc.

    36. Policy options • Changing relative factor prices • Traditional-sector workers have very low incomes and minimum-wage laws are seldom enforced. • Artificially high modern-sector wages (due to unions or laws) reduce the growth of the modern sector, condemning more people to poverty and exclusion. • Changing relative factor prices • Market-determined wages (which would be lower) in the modern sector would increase employment and incomes for the poor. • Market-determined cost of capital (which would be higher) would encourage firms to hire workers rather than buy capital.

    37. Policy options • Transfer payments and public provision of goods and services • Make sure it’s targeted to the poor. • Prevent the poor from becoming dependent on it … but encourage appropriate risk taking. • Discourage switching from work to program. • Avoid resentment by nearly-poor-but-not-enough who are working.

    38. Policy options • “workfare” is better than welfare if it • Does not undermine incentives for acquiring human capital needed for private sector jobs • Increases net benefits – including externalities • Is difficult to identify the needy without work requirement • There are relatively few poor people • There less social stigma / political resentment from workfare • The need for a ‘package’ of policies • Eliminate price distortions: more efficiency, more employment and less poverty • Structural change in asset ownership • Progressive taxes and transfers; safety net

    39. Voices of the Poor http://go.worldbank.org/H1N8746X10

    40. Concepts for Review Absolute poverty Asset ownership Character of economic growth Disposable income Factor share distribution of income Factors of production Functional distribution of income Gini coefficient Headcount index Income inequality Indirect taxes Kuznets curve Land reform Lorenz curve Multidimensional poverty index (MPI) Personal distribution of income Progressive income tax Public consumption Redistribution policies Regressive tax Size distribution of income Subsidy Total poverty gap (TPG) Workfare programs