1 / 12

Michael Imort Dept. of Geography and Environmental Studies Wilfrid Laurier University

Telling Students what they already know: Giving Face-to-Face Feedback on Term Papers as a Way of Fostering Students’ Capacity for Self-Directed Writing. Michael Imort Dept. of Geography and Environmental Studies Wilfrid Laurier University. Outline. Transformation

blenda
Download Presentation

Michael Imort Dept. of Geography and Environmental Studies Wilfrid Laurier University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Telling Students what they already know:Giving Face-to-Face Feedback on Term Papersas a Way of Fostering Students’ Capacityfor Self-Directed Writing Michael Imort Dept. of Geography and Environmental Studies Wilfrid Laurier University

  2. Outline • Transformation • What is face-to-face feedback? • Process • Purpose • Effects/Benefits

  3. Transformation • All (good) teaching is transformative

  4. What is face-to-face feedback? • Students write a three-stage term paper: proposal, draft, revised paper • Proposal: • students develop outline with clear argument and bulk of supporting material • Draft: • ‘best shot’ at a paper, discussed with instructor in 10-15 min feedback session • Revised paper: • student revises draft on the basis of the feedback received • No detailed feedback given on revised paper, only minimal comments

  5. Process • Have students sign up for feedback in 15 min intervals (approx. 30 per day) • Always begin by laying out the purpose of the meeting (don’t assume!) • Ask student for self-assessment of the assignment and their writing in general (explain why!) • Ask follow-up questions (be an active interlocutor) • Ask questions that help unearth ‘history’ of writing habits • Validate self-assessment

  6. Process cont’d • Quickly clear up formal issues (spelling, punctuation, etc.: focus on patterns) • Move on to structural issues (argument, logic, style, grammar) • Read ‘offending’ sentences out loud • Draw conceptual diagrams and use imagery (remember effectiveness of anecdotal teaching) • Draw ‘overlay map’ of paper that highlights structure

  7. Process cont’d • Ask many questions • Ask questions that makes student give the answers you would usually give • Encourage student to trust their own intuition – after all, that is the purpose! • Explain your intentions throughout

  8. Purpose of face-to-face feedback • Assessment aspects: • Increases immediacy and effectiveness of feedback • Allows students to participate in assessment (what grade would you have given?) • Limits time demands on instructor • Teaches students to self-assess and self-monitor (trust their own intuition)

  9. Purpose cont’d • Transformation aspects • Transform students’ perception of themselves (individuals) • Transform students into more accountable scholars • Transform students into collaborators • Transform students into authors that are aware of the power of writing • Transform instructor/student relationship • Transform students’ experience of university

  10. Effects on/Advantages for Student • Can incorporate feedback into current assignment/course • Two-way conversation enables better understanding • Student can ask questions about feedback • Focussed time in a controlled environment • Better grades • Personal attention

  11. Effects on/Advantages for Instructor • Controls feedback situation • Can gauge impact/reception of feedback • Opportunity to give very positive feedback • Improves rapport • Improves motivation to give feedback • Feedback can lead to better final paper (rewarding to read) • ‘Front-ending’ alleviates end-of-term time crunch • Time savings: verbal feedback is usually faster than written comments • Paper can be read with varying intensity (more intense in the beginning)

  12. Other advantages not covered here • Prevents plagiarism • Involves student in assessment design (struggling to define question) • Encourages early start • Reinforces the notion that a paper is a process, not an act • Allows feedback on research process and methods

More Related