1 / 58

Rigid Pipe Design Challenges

Derek Light, P.Eng. Rigid Pipe Design Challenges. 2. What’s up in Western Canada? Design Methods Reviewed NFL Break Indirect vs Direct Design. What are the design options for rigid pipe? Do Nothing? Indirect Design Fill height tables Hand calculations – Design Data 9 PipePac software

blancaf
Download Presentation

Rigid Pipe Design Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Derek Light, P.Eng. Rigid Pipe Design Challenges www.concrete-pipe.org

  2. 2 • What’s up in Western Canada? • Design Methods Reviewed • NFL Break • Indirect vs Direct Design www.concrete-pipe.org

  3. What are the design options for rigid pipe? • Do Nothing? • Indirect Design • Fill height tables • Hand calculations – Design Data 9 • PipePac software • Direct Design • Hand calculations • Pipecar software • Axial Designs – ASCE 27 Rigid Pipe Design Options www.concrete-pipe.org

  4. Western Canada www.concrete-pipe.org

  5. Western Canada www.concrete-pipe.org

  6. Western Canada • Square mile equivalent to Alaska, Texas, California, and West Virginia combined - 1.1 Million Square miles • Population equivalent to Ohio – 11.5 Million www.concrete-pipe.org

  7. Western Canada - Regions www.concrete-pipe.org

  8. Current Design Practice – Zero Structural Design 75% 10% 30% 43% 25% www.concrete-pipe.org

  9. Zero Structural Design • “Just finished my hydraulic design, and I am feeling fine” • “Let’s go to the bar!” www.concrete-pipe.org

  10. Zero Structural Design – Common Assumptions • “Product selection is the responsibility of the contractor” • “Its on the approved product list, what further design work needs to be done?” • “The manufacturer is responsible for the design, they told me not to worry” • “Pipe failures don’t occur that often, I am not overly concerned about the structure” www.concrete-pipe.org

  11. EDMONTON DESIGN STANDARDS Volume 3 Drainage, Structural Design for Pipe

  12. Current Design Practice – Fill Height Tables 13% 80% 60% 29% 8% www.concrete-pipe.org

  13. Fill Height Tables • Based on indirect design. • The right idea, but can you really trust these guys to get it done? www.concrete-pipe.org

  14. Current Design Practice – PipePac and Pipecar 13% 5% 10% 67% 28% www.concrete-pipe.org

  15. PipePac and Pipecar • Tried, tested, and true! • These guys know what it takes to get the job done. www.concrete-pipe.org

  16. Current Design Breakdown – Western Canada www.concrete-pipe.org

  17. Rigid Pipe Design Options • What are the design options for rigid pipe? • Do Nothing? • Indirect Design • Fill height tables • Hand calculations – Design Data 9 • PipePac software • Direct Design • Hand calculations • Pipecar software • Axial Designs – ASCE 27 www.concrete-pipe.org

  18. Fill Height Table www.concrete-pipe.org

  19. Fill Height Table www.concrete-pipe.org

  20. Fill Height Table www.concrete-pipe.org

  21. Rigid Pipe Design Options • What are the design options for rigid pipe? • Do Nothing? • Indirect Design • Fill height tables • Hand calculations – Design Data 9 • PipePac software • Direct Design • Hand calculations • Pipecar software • Axial Designs – ASCE 27 www.concrete-pipe.org

  22. Indirect design (ASTM C76) Empirical Most common method Determine Pipe Class Indirect Design Method

  23. Indirect Design – The Proof 3EB Test is an external load crushing test Confirms product was manufactured correctly

  24. 3 Edge Bearing Test Hairline flexural crack - indicates load has shifted to reinforcement

  25. Standard Trench Installation

  26. Standard Embankment Installation

  27. Standard Installation Soils & Minimum Compaction Requirements

  28. Standard Installations – Pressure Distribution

  29. Indirect Design Process • Determine pipe installation method • Select bedding and compaction • Calculate load • Determine bedding factor • Factor of safety • Calculate D-Load

  30. Step 1 – Installation Type Trench Embankment Jacked, bored or tunnelled

  31. Step 2 – Standard Installations

  32. Step 3 – Dead and Live Load Live load Dead load Pipe

  33. Step 4 – Bedding Factor MTEST Bf= MFIELD Where: Bf = Bedding factors MFIELD = Maximum load in pipe under field loads before failure, N/m (inch-pounds) MTEST = Maximum load in pipe under three-edge bearing test before failure, N/m (inch-pounds)

  34. Step 5 – Factor of Safety Reinforced concrete pipe use 1.0 for the 0.3mm (0.01”) crack strength

  35. Step 6 – Calculate Pipe Strength • Determine pipe strength: • D-Load = WE + WL * FS • Bfe BfLL D • Where: • WE = Earth load, kg/m (lbs/ft) • WL = Live load, kg/m (lbs/ft) • Bfe = Earth load bedding factor • BfLL = Live load bedding factor • D = Pipe diameter, mm (ft) • FS = Factor of safety

  36. Pipe Strength • Class II = 50 N/m/mm or 1000 lbs/ft/ft • Class III = 65 N/m/mm or 1350 lbs/ft/ft • Class IV = 100 N/m/mm or 2000 lbs/ft/ft • Class V = 140 N/m/mm or 3000 lbs/ft/ft

  37. PipePac Applies to all applications Free software http://www.concretepipe.org/pipe-box-resources/software/pipepac/ Input versatility Pipe shape and type Wall thickness Geotechnical properties Live load Height of Fill Installation type Bedding type (1-4) Standard compliance options (ASTM – CSA)

  38. NFL Video Intermission www.concrete-pipe.org

  39. Rigid Pipe Design Options • What are the design options for rigid pipe? • Do Nothing? • Indirect Design • Fill height tables • Hand calculations – Design Data 9 • PipePac software • Direct Design • Hand calculations • Pipecar software • Axial Designs – ASCE 27 www.concrete-pipe.org

  40. Direct Design Direct design (ASCE 15-98) Limit State Design method Factored loads Pipecar

  41. Indirect vs Direct www.concrete-pipe.org

  42. Pipecar Software • Applies to all applications • Input versatility • Pipe shape and type • Wall thickness • Geotechnical properties • Material properties – Steel & Concrete • Pressure Distribution • Live load • Height of Fill • Bedding type (1-4) • Standard compliance options (ASTM – CSA) www.concrete-pipe.org

  43. Shear Mitigation • Increased Concrete Strength • Increased Wall Thickness • Tighter Steel Spacing • Stirrups www.concrete-pipe.org

  44. Direct Design

  45. Flexure Controlled Design

  46. Diagonal Tension Controlled

  47. Radial and Diagonal Tension Controlled

  48. Indirect vs Direct

  49. Indirect vs Direct

  50. Indirect vs Direct

More Related