1 / 8

IETF 91: Honolulu draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-03

IETF 91: Honolulu draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-03. V6ops Monday November 10, 2014 Phillip Matthews Victor Kuarsingh. Progress. Two versions as individual-contributor draft First WG draft, v ersion -00 / February 14, 2013 Added Victor as co-author Version -01 / March 6, 2014

blair-gibbs
Download Presentation

IETF 91: Honolulu draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-03

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IETF 91: Honoluludraft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-03 V6ops Monday November 10, 2014 Phillip Matthews Victor Kuarsingh

  2. Progress • Two versions as individual-contributor draft • First WG draft, version -00 / February 14, 2013 • Added Victor as co-author • Version -01 / March 6, 2014 • Added IGP Choices, other updates • Version -02 / Sept 4, 2014 • Updates based on list feedback, significant update to IGP text and large update to BGP text • Version -03 / Sept 18, 2014 • Current version; minor updates based on list feedback IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

  3. Status - 1 • Current draft covers • Link Configuration (IPv4/6 addresses, Link-Local vs. GUA) • Static Routes / Default Routes • IGP Choices • BGP Configuration (interior and exterior routing) • Includes discussion of VPN IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

  4. Status - 2 • IGP Discussion • Discussion focused on IS-IS and OSPF • Provide table to enumerate options between OSPFv2, OSPFv3 and IS-IS • Evaluate against: • Known to work well, • Hard separation (v6 vs. v4), • Potentially similar configuration • Discussion of criteria areas provided IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

  5. Status - 3 • BGP Discussion • Provide table on options inside network around: route family (SAFI), transport (session over v4/v6), and comments • Works Well, Next-Hop Issues, issues until MPLS over IPv6 is made available • Followed by discussion on sessions for unlabeled routes, Labeled/VPN routes and eBGP endpoints IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

  6. Status - 4 • General Discussion • Use of Link-Local Addresses • Separation of IPv4 and IPv6 • This was done since these are two very important design items which operators and design often wrestle with during initial design formation IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

  7. Status - 5 • Lots of other topics that could potentially be added. However, authors feel this draft should be kept narrowly-scoped and completed quickly. • Future documents can address other areas • Seeking additional comments on draft. • Would like to move quickly to WGLC. IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

  8. Discussion? • WGLC? IETF 91, Honolulu, Hawaii

More Related