1 / 32

Jan Van Hoeymissen An Denis

DE NOORDERKEMPEN. Jan Van Hoeymissen An Denis. Social Housing. DE NOORDERKEMPEN. OBJECTIVES: Affordable houses Good houses (technical, looks, image) Comfortable Good enviroment Good location Good neighbours Social control Integration of cultures For people who need it.

blade
Download Presentation

Jan Van Hoeymissen An Denis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DE NOORDERKEMPEN Jan Van HoeymissenAn Denis SocialHousing

  2. DE NOORDERKEMPEN OBJECTIVES: • Affordable houses • Good houses (technical, looks, image) • Comfortable • Good enviroment • Good location • Good neighbours • Social control • Integration of cultures • For people who need it

  3. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Build • Buy & renovate • Sell • Rent • Long lease (trust)

  4. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Long lease: • 1 experiencehouses • 2 experienceswithmonestaries • Manyplans

  5. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Merksplas: “kolonie” • 64 houses • 56 in LTR • Enviroment • Central • “ruins” (examples)

  6. MERKSPLAS 166 House trust 66 houses

  7. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Big houses • Great enviroment • Big gardens; great community

  8. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Big houses • Great enviroment • Big gardens; great community

  9. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Get the complete property in trust for 99 years • Entry level premium (condition of the house) • No pricefor the grounds (2% of ½ ) • Annual trust fee : 200 € - 700 € • Habitationduty: 10 – 20 years • Compulsaryworks

  10. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Advantagesfor the lease-hold-taker: • Low pricefor a building withanenormouspotential • Priviliges of anowner • Residential security • More thanonegeneration • Excellent enviroment • Can spread workandcosts • Adjusttoown taste

  11. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Disadvantagesfor the lease-hold-taker: • No owner • Compulsaryworks • Notpossibletosellforseveralyears • Payment never stops • Cost: 2% of ½ of ground-price • Startingcapital • Unclarities: • Fiscalrules ? • Loans ?

  12. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Advantagesfor the lease-giver: • Owner • Building getsrenovated • Compulsaryrules • Maintenance of the houses

  13. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Disadvantagesfor the lease-giver: • Pre-investment • Low ROI • Lease-takers are likeowners (><regulationforrenting) • No controle of whowill live in the house • Controle on the compulsaryworks • Court-orders

  14. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Seperateorganisation: • List of candidates • Notary • Controle • Follow-up (payment; works, …)

  15. DE NOORDERKEMPEN OBJECTIVES: • Affordable houses • Good houses (technical, looks, image) • Comfortable houses • Good enviroment • Good location • Good neighbours • Social control • Integration of cultures ? • For people who need it ?

  16. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Needs: • Housing • Comfortable • Central • Enviroment • Payable • “ownership”

  17. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Possibilities: • Rent • Buy • Trust • Land trust

  18. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Opportunities • Needs • Problems: • Way of thinking • Lacks in the legislaticon • Gouvernment

  19. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Needsforresidents: • Certaintyforhousing • Payable • Good site • Transport-possibilities

  20. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Problemfor the future: • land • Evolution of needs; possibilities; … • Enviroments • Traffic: consideration of organisation of habituation • Keep controle over the land • Culture: protection

  21. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Proposition • Land trust for a small fee • House build in basic structure-windproof • 1 lifetime (definition) • Costs: • Ground: 2 % of landvalueyearly (100 €/mth) • Basic house : f.e. 90,000 € (sellingprice): • Ownrecourses : f.e. 15,000€ • 75,000€ over 30 years (200 €/mth) • Finishing the house : f.e. 90,000 € : (250 €/mth) • => 550 €/mnth. during 30 yrs. • => 100 €/mnth. during the rest of the “lifetime”

  22. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Proposition • Heritage-giver: makes a “profit” (overheadcost & investment) • Keeps a saying in the enviroment • Gets a house back after a life-time (in whatcondition?) • Costs: • Ground: 60,000 € • Basic house : f.i. 90,000 € : recovers the money in 30 yrs • Finishing the house : f.i. 90,000 € : lends the money andrecoversit in 30 yrs. (+ interest ?)

  23. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • End of the “lifetime”: • Groundremainspropriety of DNK • The house is bought back • Price: originalvalue of the basic house

  24. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • costs: ground: • No basic investment • Groundvalue: f.e. 60,000 € • 2 % /year : 2,000 € = 100 €/mnth

  25. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • House: • Basic: 90,000 € • Payable on 30 (of more/less) years • = max. 250 €/mnth. (+ interest?) (depends on own investment)

  26. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Finishing the house: • Ownchoice • Depending on financial andotherpossibilities • Wheneverconvenientfor the trust-taker

  27. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • After “a lifetime”: • 90,000 € is payedto the enharitages • Land + house back to the trust-giver

  28. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Issues tobedefined: • fiscality • possibilitiesto rent • Definition of “a life time”

  29. DE NOORDERKEMPEN • Mainproblem: • different mentality in Flanders • Marketing • DNK willtryto do as much as possiblewithin the actualpossibilities.

More Related