1 / 1

SULFUR AND IRON ACCUMULATION IN NEOLITHIC ASH WOOD SAMPLE FROM YENIKAPI EXAVATION SITE

Nural Yilgor 1 , D.Dogu 2 , T. Kuster 3 . Introduction :

bina
Download Presentation

SULFUR AND IRON ACCUMULATION IN NEOLITHIC ASH WOOD SAMPLE FROM YENIKAPI EXAVATION SITE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NuralYilgor1, D.Dogu2, T. Kuster3 Introduction: During the excavations of the Marmaray Rail Tube Tunnel Project in Yenikapi, Istanbul, Turkey, a great number of Neolithic period tree remnants were unearthed along with countless Byzantine and Ottoman period archaeological remains. Those trees were found at 8.5 m below the sea level during the excavations of the swamp and it was observed that the tree remnants were in an upright position.Firstly, the wood samples were examined anatomically to identify the species and after that one wood sample was chosen among the identified trees for the determination of chemical properties and further anatomical investigations. The tree remnants which were chosen for this study have been identified as Fraxinus spp. (ash wood). SEM observationsand EDX mapresultsshowthatancientashwoodcontainshighamount of sulfurandironelementswhicharetypicalforthemarine-archaeologicalwoodthat is found in an anoxicconditionslikeseawaterorswamp. SULFUR AND IRON ACCUMULATION IN NEOLITHIC ASH WOOD SAMPLE FROM YENIKAPI EXAVATION SITE Figure 2. Theview of spongyandyellowishcolour of wetunearthedashwood Fig.1. Theexcavation site of neolithictrees MaterialandMethod: Afterwoodsampleswereunearthed, theyweresubjectedtoanatomicalexaminationtoidentifythespeciesunderlightandphotomicroscopes. Thesamplechoosenforthisstudywasidentified as Fraxinuswhich is known as Ash. Theancient sample was examined with scanning electron microscope (SEM) Carl Zeiss EVO 40, equipped with energy dispersive X-ray analyser to get a map of elements distributions on the surface and in cell walls. Results and conclusion: The map was obtained on the surface by the help of EDX spectrum analyser and according to EDX spectrum analyser S and Fe have the highest values following C and O elements in ancient buried ash wood. While elemental Fe is changing in the range of %7.2to %10.1, elemental S is changing %7 to %11.4 in ancient ash wood sample surface. SEM investigations demonstrate that there are many images that do not belong to the fungi or bacteria as seen in Fig.5 (a,b,c). SEM and EDX spectrum results show that iron and sulfur are present in a variety of particles of different sizes in contrast the fungi remains. Itis assumedthatsulfatereducingbacteriaareresponsiblefromtheformation of fraboidalpyritewhichoccursunderoxicconditions. It is suggested that in anoxic conditions like seabed or sediments, sulphate reducing bacteriaproduce hydrogen sulphide, H2S, which transforms to different reduced sulphur compounds in the waterlogged wood (1). On the other hand, bacterial attack facilitate the penetration of Fe2+ionsandH2Sthroughout the inner part of waterlogged wood. Thisresult strengthens the possibility that the area where the trees were found had a connection with the sea. References: 1.Yvonne Fors, Magnus Sandström. “Sulfur and iron in shipwrecks cause conservation concerns” Vol.35, Chemical Society Reviews, (2006) 399-415 Fig.3. Theexcavation site of neolithictrees (a) Cross section of ancientashwood (b) Cross section of recentashwood a a b b Figure 4 (a &b). EDX Spectrum of ancient wood of Fraxinus c Table 1. Distribution of the elements in the ancient wood samples according to EDX Analyser. Figure 5. SEM Images of ancientFraxinuswood (a) A viewfromcrosssection (b) Pyriteclusters (c) Pyriteframboids 1Department of Forest Products Chemistry and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, 34473, Istanbul, TURKEY 2Department of Forest Biology and Wood Protection Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, 34473, Istanbul, TURKEY 3USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, 53726, USA

More Related