html5-img
1 / 3

Q 0 2 =4 GeV 2

Q 0 2 =4 GeV 2. Q 0 2 =4 GeV 2. ZEUS parametrization. H1 parametrization Nature of the parametrization forces the errors on the low-x valence distributions to be very small- better to compare U,D. Central values of the fits are very close- good news I

beverly-nunez
Download Presentation

Q 0 2 =4 GeV 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Q02=4 GeV2 Q02=4 GeV2 ZEUS parametrization H1 parametrization Nature of the parametrization forces the errors on the low-x valence distributions to be very small- better to compare U,D Central values of the fits are very close- good news I haven’t added the charm into the sea for H1, so it’s a bit low Very similar χ2 ~ 500 for 584 points

  2. ZEUS parametrisation xf(x) = A xa (1-x)b (1+ c x) For u,d valence, sea and glue Au,Ad,Ag from sum rules, ad=au, cs=0 H1 parametrisation xf(x) = A xa (1-x)b (1+ c x) (no x3 term) For U=u+c, D=d+s, Ubar, Dbar and glue AU,AD,Ag from sum-rules, aU=aD=aUbar=aDbar,cUbar=cDbar=0 aU=-0.195±0.004 bU=3.5± 0.5 cU=31 ± 2 bD=4.5 ± cD=34 ± 8 AUbar=AU,ADbar=AD bUbar = 10.8 ± 0.5 bDbar = 2.7 ± 0.9 ag= -0.115 ± 0.03 bg= 11 ± 5 cg=12 ± 5 au=0.72 ± 0.04 bu=3.99 ± 0.13 cu=1.5 ±0.71 bd=5.18 ± 0.72 cd=2.54 ± 2.02 As=0.63 ± 0.02 as=-0.197 ± 0.004 bs=6.85 ± 0.71 ag= -0.128 ± 0.02 bg=11 ± 1 cg=-16 ± 5 Low-x sea similar Gluon similar

  3. Max’s suggestion to free αS(MZ) Back to ZEUS parametrisation αS(MZ) =0.121 ± 0.003 χ2=500 Investigate scale dependence, renormalisation scale usually the biggest so start with that Scale= 2 Q2 αS(MZ) =0.123 χ2=502 Scale= 4Q2αS(MZ) =0.124 χ2=507 Scale= Q2/2 αS(MZ) =0.118 χ2=526 Scale= Q2/4 job blows up! Scale dependence 0.002-0.003? Not as bad as I thought!

More Related