html5-img
1 / 19

Families solving their problems

Family Group Conferencing in the Netherlands with regard to family-problems John Blad. Families solving their problems. ‘Eigen Kracht-conferentie’:

betrys
Download Presentation

Families solving their problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Family Group Conferencing in the Netherlands with regard to family-problems John Blad Families solving their problems

  2. ‘Eigen Kracht-conferentie’: ‘a method to leave the responsibility with the family for severe decisions with regard to family problems. It gives the family the opportunity to make a plan, using their ‘own capabilities’ and resources from outside the family.’ Inspired by 1989 New-Zealand model Family Group Conferencing

  3. Groei Eigen Kracht-conferenties 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Increasingly used since 2001

  4. In 2008 in sum 471 applications Organisations applied in 368 cases (78%) Youth Care (voluntary context): 58 cs Youth Protection (non-voluntary): 115 cs Family members applied in 58 cs (12%) Principal Persons themselves in 45 cs (10%) Applications in 2008

  5. All (nuclear) families involved have such severe problems that some form of action is required ‘Principal persons’ in these problems are: Children and young persons (and their parents) Adults Only 10% have no history of professional assistance Types of families involved

  6. Children were ‘principal persons’ in 245 cases In sum 723 problems were mentioned: Educational incompetence/neglect: 130x Behavioral problems: 119x Divorce-problems: 85x Overburdened parents: 65x 471 cases in 2008

  7. Adults as principal persons in 226 cases Adults problems related to children: 155 cases ( in sum 522 problems) Similar pattern of problems as children Exclusively adults problems: 71 cases (in sum 157 problems) Predominantly: finances, housing, illness. 471 cases in 2008

  8. Mentioned as reason for FGC on application form 400 cases with related children and adults as principal persons: 1215 worries Education matters: 224x Dwelling: where should the child live: 182x Conduct of the child: 180x Main worries and questions

  9. 162 cases (34%) ended in the preparatory phase without a conference 31 cases: another positive solution unknown reasons in 20 cases In all other cases there were impediments such as non-co-operation, quarrels or absence of a social network. Phase 1 cases (2008)

  10. 309 cases resulted in a EKc Within three months after application: 84% 277 EKc’s concerned children as principal persons (in sum 887 problems) 32 EKc’s concerned only adults (in sum 75 problems) Conference cases (2008)

  11. Duration of the conferences: Less than 8 hrs. (96%) Private time (to prepare plan): 1-3 hrs. Numbers of participants per EKc: On average 12.8 persons ( 3 to 50). Conference cases 2008

  12. 296 EKC’s resulted in a family plan (96%) In only 2 cases the professional applicant did not accept the family-plan. Reason: Family supervisor did not give his prior consent. Other reasons might have been: Plan is against the law or is considered unsafe for involved children. Results of the conferences

  13. In 75% of the plans a.o. professional social assistance is requested; In 92% of the plans an evaluation-date is planned; In 86% of the plans an ‘emergency-plan’ is included as back-up in case of failure. When place of residence was a ‘worry’ in 27% of the plans residence was changed. Results of the conferences

  14. In 90% of the EKc’s a follow-up inquiry took place within six months. Average nr. of persons interviewed: 3.2. Of all categories of involved persons: 40% say plan completely implemented. 50% say it was implemented partially. Around 10%: not implemented at all. Follow-up data

  15. (65% respons) Average marks for the: conferences: 7.6 plans: 7.3 co-ordinator: 7.9 EKc-regional manager: 8.2 Evaluations of professionals

  16. (74% respons) Average marks for: The conference: 7.7 Private time: 7.6 Plan: 7.8 Co-ordinator: 8.1 Professional applicant: 7.2 Evaluations of family and social networks

  17. 64% of the respondents said they had input in terms of information; 92% said they had asked everything they wanted to ask; 93% said they had their full say; 83% said they had contributed effectively to the plan; 86% said they were completely at ease. Evaluations of family and social networks

  18. EKc’s speed up a dramatic decrease in problems within 3 months; referring professionals report slight improvements in safety and welfare of children involved within 3 and 9 months. Social cohesion within and support of the extended families/social networks increased. Less appeal to help agencies. Coping conduct and self-control increased It’s the Family’s move

  19. Informations: info@Eigen-Kracht.nl Complaints: Blad@frg.eur.nl Thank you for your attention

More Related