1 / 2

SAP Simple logistics Online Training | SAP Simple logistics Training

Best Online Career offers SAP S4 Hana simple logistics online training in India for those who are willing to explore their career in S/4 Hana and become a master in simple finance.<br>URL: https://bit.ly/3CNxR9B<br>Mail Id: info@bestonlinecareer.com<br>Call: IND: 91 9922848898<br> USA: 1 315 505 4440

Download Presentation

SAP Simple logistics Online Training | SAP Simple logistics Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. In the end what kind of enterprise is suitable for implementing the SAP system? SAP system, as the No. 1 ERP system in the world, claims that 80% of the world's top 500 companies have deployed the SAP system. The headquarters is located in Waldorf, Germany. Has a partner network covering 11,500 companies around the world. The essence of the SAP system is a diversified, multi-organizational and highly integrated ERP system. It is not as simple as system software, but provides powerful industry solutions and rigorous and efficient management methods. But even so, not all enterprises are suitable for implementing SAP system as a system for their core business. The so-called Mercedes-Benz car is good, but for people who do not have a driver's license, it is not as good as an electric car that can drive… So, what kind of enterprise is suitable for implementing the SAP system? Personally, I think the following points: 1. The turnover and profit of the enterprise must reach a certain level. Implementing SAP is a very capital, resource and manpower-intensive project. If the company's funds are not sufficient to drive this system, the project will be unsustainable in the future. The implementation of the SAP system must be driven by at least 1% of the company's annual turnover. After all, from the server room, implementation costs, software costs, and license costs (SAP's license counts the number of users, not the number of concurrent users), 22% of the annual turnover is calculated. Maintenance fees (see the contract), talent fees, etc. are all large. Therefore, the company's turnover must be at least 1 billion yuan, and the profit is more than 200 million yuan. Enterprises below this value should not touch SAP easily. SAP is very expensive, very expensive, very expensive, so enterprises should be prepared accordingly. 2. Second, the enterprise needs to have a certain business scale. For those companies with very single product lines and businesses, it is best not to touch the SAP system easily. At the same time, only for a single organization, it is not a wise choice to go to the SAP system. Although SAP can be easily done, it is just a bit of a big deal to implement, and it feels like a cart pulling a plowshare. 3. Third, the level of enterprise management should keep up. When you get on SAP, many business models, operation methods and enterprise management concepts will also be changed accordingly. Don't think about making the SAP system completely adapt to the enterprise model (of course, don't necessarily think that the enterprise should completely adapt to the SAP system), both parties There must be a certain running-in process, and related adjustments must be made in the SAP implementation cycle, which will test the ability of Party B's consulting company. If a company rests on its laurels and is unwilling to try and change, it should use Excel to manage data artificially. After all, this is simpler and more flexible than SAP, and the data can be adjusted as you want. 4. Fourth, the best is the manufacturing industry. The manufacturing industry mentioned here refers to having its own processing plants, sales and procurement centers, etc. If the enterprise is just a very simple foreign trade business, or logistics, finance, service-oriented, government organizations, etc., it is better not to consider clinging to SAP, like many domestic software manufacturers that are relatively poor and relatively small, such as UF Kingdee, are enough to play... One of the cores of ERP is production planning and cost management. If this module is not used, it will simply not reflect the advantages of SAP! 5. Clear business requirements and planning. The internal demand department of the enterprise needs very clear requirements, what kind of goals to achieve on the SAP system, how to reduce inventory pressure, how to speed up the inventory

  2. turnover rate, do a good job in purchasing cost analysis, speed up financial statements and what requirements should be met in business specifications, These are all things that demand departments and bosses need to consider. Before choosing SAP, it is necessary to know whether the system architecture fits the actual business of the enterprise, and whether the business requirements thrown out have corresponding and reasonable solutions. The so-called demand-driven, if the internal implementation of SAP is not clear what to achieve I don’t know the internal business needs, so let’s take a nap as soon as possible. 6. The concept of unified science The SAP project is not purely a matter of the Information Department, and other departments are not helping the Information Department with the project, but the entire department is mobilized together to join the project and take corresponding responsibilities for their own modules and business. Moreover, the cognition of the system must be scientific. SAP is not all-encompassing, nor does it think that the use of the SAP system will bring down the number of personnel and reduce the workload of the department. The system only helps everyone to avoid the information verification that should be avoided, and hand over all the things that would have required mental effort to the system for automatic execution, freeing up manpower and putting the corresponding manpower into higher-level analysis. This is going to SAP The original intention of the system. 7. Leading projects. The implementation of the SAP system requires the use of resources from all aspects of the enterprise, and a huge investment in capital, manpower and time. It is not something that can be decided by a few "general managers". The only person who can mobilize resources may be the founder or boss of the company, and he has to be named and support, supervise and arrange throughout the SAP implementation cycle. If the first-in-command project is not carried out in place, only regular project meetings are held, and then the boss will see the beginning and the end, leaving only a vice president or project manager to fiddle there. It must be a piece of shit!

More Related