1 / 14

Dynamical simulations of virus wrapping and budding

Dynamical simulations of virus wrapping and budding. T. Ruiz-Herrero 1 , M. F. Hagan 2 , E. Velasco 1. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA. INTRODUCTION. exiting the cell. Budding. acquiring membrane coating. Attachment to the cell membrane

berne
Download Presentation

Dynamical simulations of virus wrapping and budding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dynamical simulations of virus wrapping and budding T. Ruiz-Herrero1, M. F. Hagan2, E. Velasco1 • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain • Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA

  2. INTRODUCTION exiting the cell Budding acquiring membrane coating Attachment to the cell membrane Wrapping Fusion of the final neck Budding steps 1/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  3. polar head Hydrophilic tail COARSE GRAINING 2/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  4. Vrep Vbond Vbend Vatrr MEMBRANE MODEL:cooke model [Cooke et al, Phys. Rev. E, 72 (2205)] 3/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  5. A/σ2 κ/ε0 ωC ωC MEMBRANE MODEL CHARACTERISTICS ● Broad range of fluidity ● Easily tunable ● Good agreement with measurements: rigidity, diffusion, density kBT/ε0=1.1 [from Cooke et al,Phys Rev E, 72 (2205)] Area per molecule Bending rigidity 4/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  6. MEMBRANE PARTICLE INTERACTION AND SIMULATION CHARACTERISTICS Membrane-particle interaction s s=R-σ/2 • Simulation characteristics: Important parameters: • Molecular dynamics simulation R • NPT ensamble ε • Langevin thermostat kBT/ε=1.1 ωc κ,ρ • Andersen barostat P=0 • Verlet algorithm 5/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  7. SIMULATIONS RESULTS: MAIN BEHAVIORS WRAPPING NON-WRAPPING MEMBRANE BREAKING 6/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  8. /0=1e3 /0=5e3 /0=3e4 /0=1e4 SYSTEM BEHAVIOR 1: NON-WRAPPING 7/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  9. /0=5e3 /0=5e2 /0=1.5e4 /0=1.55e4 /0=1.6e4 /0=1.65e4 SYSTEM BEHAVIOR 2: WRAPPING 8/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  10. /0=6e3 /0=7e3 /0=5.5e3 /=7.5e3 /0=9.5e3 /0=1e4 SYSTEM BEHAVIOR 3: MEMBRANE BREAKING 9/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  11. /kBT=12.5 R/σ=10 ε/ε0 R/σ /ε0 PHASE DIAGRAMS ε/ε0 In general, good agreement between simulations and theory Subtle dependence on bending coefficient For small epsilons deviation from theory 10/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  12. ELASTIC THEORY 11/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  13. ENERGY MAPS AND BUDDING PATHWAYS ε/ε0=0.9 ε/ε0=0.7 θ[rad] θ[rad] Penetration[σ] ε/ε0=1.1 Penetration[σ] θ[rad] Penetration[σ] 12/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

  14. BUDDING DYNAMICS: TIME SCALES AND PENETRATION Penetration vs time • steepness of the budding pathway ---> process speed • strenght adhesion energy ---> maximum penetration 13/13 T. RUIZ-HERRERO

More Related