Completing Your SHIP Annual Report
320 likes | 696 Views
Completing Your SHIP Annual Report May 12, 2010 Sapna Swaroop & Joanne Moze SHIP Evaluation Team 2009 Interim Reports Thank you for submitting your 2009 Interim Reports! They were the cornerstone of the SHIP Legislative Report (January 2010)
Completing Your SHIP Annual Report
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Completing Your SHIP Annual Report May 12, 2010 Sapna Swaroop & Joanne Moze SHIP Evaluation Team
2009 Interim Reports • Thank you for submitting your 2009 Interim Reports! • They were the cornerstone of the SHIP Legislative Report (January 2010) • We are currently using the reports to identify areas for technical assistance • We took your feedback into account and revised our reporting mechanism
Purposes of SHIP Reporting • Helps track progress for each grantee and across the state • Identifies areas for modification • Highlights technical assistance needs • Provides rationale and evidence for sustained funding
Reporting Logistics • All grantees complete the same form • SHIP Reporting Page • Reporting Period: July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 (State Fiscal Year) • Due Date: July 30, 2010 by 4:30 pm • Please submit electronically to us at: diane.lauren@state.mn.us
Reporting Overview • Part I is general information about your progress on grant activities • Part II is specific reporting on each intervention • Please include attachments that you would like to share or think would be helpful for us
Part I: General Information • Purpose • Helps summarize and synthesize your SHIP work • Provides information about overarching topics (e.g., communications, at-risk/high-risk populations) • Be specific! • Please respect the 12-page limit
Box 2: Summary • If you were stuck in line at the farmers’ market for 5 minutes, what would you tell your fellow customers about your SHIP work? • Should contain overarching, broad-brush information about your most important activities • You will get more detailed in the intervention-specific reporting section
Box 3: Community Leadership Team • Listing the organizations is sufficient – not necessary to include information about the individuals on your Team • Answers should give us a sense of the purpose of your Team and how it helps move your SHIP work forward
Box 4: At-Risk/High-Risk Populations • Reducing health disparities is vital to reducing statewide obesity and tobacco use rates • SHIP funds should be used to move this work forward • If you are not doing work in this area, use your answers to this question to assess your needs in this area • Partner with community organizations that serve these populations? • Ensure your SHIP interventions work to address the issue of disparities
Box 5: Communications • Lets us know how and to whom you have communicated about SHIP • Helps evaluate “reach” of SHIP across the state outside of your interventions • Helps give perspective on the statewide “movement” toward reducing obesity and tobacco use/exposure • Can highlight SHIP successes
Box 6: Duplication • Helps account for all the different sources of funding you are using to do your SHIP (or similar) work • Be specific about what SHIP funds are being used for compared to other sources of funding • Answers to this question are important for us to demonstrate the unique value that SHIP funds add to work on obesity and tobacco
Box 7: Success Stories • Helps us tell the rich, detailed stories of your successes • Modified system for collecting success stories • List the three successes that you are most excited about or have moved your work forward the most – your Rock Star successes! • Someone will follow up with you to interview you about at least one of your successes • Please include contact information for the most appropriate person to be interviewed about each success
Box 8: Feedback for MDH • Prior responses were helpful and resulted in: • streamlined reporting process • regional trainings • identification of master technical assistance providers • We would really appreciate your response!
Part II: Intervention-Specific Reporting • Purpose • Provides information about each selected intervention • Ensures that your evaluation is moving along well • Identifies areas for technical assistance across interventions • Please do this for each intervention • Respect the 12-page per intervention limit • May need to carefully choose what you report • Be specific! • In special circumstances, please contact us
Box 1: Summary • You just got an extra 5 minutes in line at the farmers’ market! Tell your fellow customers about one intervention • Answers the following questions: • What is the intervention? • Whom does the intervention affect? • How many people does the intervention affect? • How is it going?
Box 1: Summary • Quick summary of your intervention beyond the MDH-designated description • Simple list of sites is fine • No additional description is necessary, but please include the information if you would like
Box 1: Summary • Organizational Reach • List the number of sites you are affecting • List the number of sites you could affect • Estimate the percent of sites you are affecting (this is the organizational reach) - Divide the number of sites you are affecting by the possible number of sites you might affect
Box 1: Summary • Population Reach • List the number of people per site that you are affecting and add them up • List the number of people per sites you could affect and add them up • Estimate the percent of the population you are affecting (this is the population reach) - Divide the total number of people you are affecting by the possible number of people you might affect
Box 1: Summary • Be specific! • Brag about your successes • Be honest about your challenges
Box 2: Action Plans • Include major changes that substantially alter the direction of your work • Dropping or adding sites • Major barriers have emerged that need to be addressed • Change in focus of activities • Moving from a policy change to a systems change • Do not include more minor changes • Changing the order of activities or action steps • Doing a focus group instead of a key informant interview • You will need to define ‘substantial change’ for your specific work
Box 2: Action Plans • If there are common steps by site, list those first and then list site-specific Action Steps • Include only ‘major’ Action Steps • Because of space constraints, you may need to be selective in what you report
Box 2: Action Plans • Focus is on the tangible evidence that an Action Step has been completed • If there are results associated with an Action Step, please outline these results • For example, if an assessment has been completed, please give a brief overview of the key findings of the assessment • These are linked to the process indicators in your Evaluation Plans
Box 3: Results • If you have implemented any PSE changes, please outline the key content of these changes • If you have not implemented any PSE changes, indicate that it is not applicable
Box 3: Results • Why are we asking you to measure health behaviors? • We need some ‘short-term wins’ in health behavior change • Smaller-scale, site-specific health behavior change will be evident sooner than larger-scale change • When should you measure health behaviors? • If the intervention directly addresses health behaviors • Prioritize where to focus your evaluation efforts
Box 3: Results • If you have implemented any PSE changes, please outline how these changes are being enforced, or the plan for enforcement • If you have not implemented any PSE changes, indicate that it is not applicable
Reporting Due Dates • Year One • Interim Report: December 1, 2009 • Final Report: July 30, 2010 • Year Two • Interim Report: January 31, 2011 • Final Report: August 1, 2011
Questions? Sapna Swaroop SHIP Evaluation Coordinator Email: sapna.swaroop@state.mn.us Phone: 651-201-5441 Joanne Moze CDC Research & Evaluation Fellow Email: joanne.moze@state.mn.us Phone: 651-201-5393