1 / 81

Rebecca L. Johnson, MD Chair, Pathology & Clinical Labs Berkshire Health Systems President, American Board of Pathol

Rebecca L. Johnson, MD Chair, Pathology & Clinical Labs Berkshire Health Systems President, American Board of Pathology. MOC. MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION - WHY SHOULD I CARE?. History of Board Certification. 1908 Derrick Vail, MD

bernad
Download Presentation

Rebecca L. Johnson, MD Chair, Pathology & Clinical Labs Berkshire Health Systems President, American Board of Pathol

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rebecca L. Johnson, MD Chair, Pathology & Clinical Labs Berkshire Health Systems President, American Board of Pathology

  2. MOC MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION - WHY SHOULD I CARE?

  3. History of Board Certification • 1908 Derrick Vail, MD • Presidential address to the American Academy of Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology • “I hope to see the time….let him then be permitted and licensed to practice ophthalmology.”

  4. American Board Of Ophthalmology • Am. Ophthalmologic Society, AMA, Academy of Ophthalmology • 1915—Defined requirements • 1917—ABO established

  5. Early Boards • 1924—Am Board of Otolaryngology • 1930—Am Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology • 1932—Am Board of Derm & Syphilology • 1933—Am Board of Pediatrics • 1934—Psychiatry & Neurology, Radiology, Orthopedic Surgery • 1935—Colon & Rectal Surgery, Urology • 1936—Internal Medicine, PATHOLOGY

  6. Advisory Board For Medical Specialties • Est. 1933 • Uniformity in MD certification • Increase public awareness • Education, training, and certification

  7. Advisory Board For Medical Specialties • Four first specialty boards • AHA, AAMC, FSMB, AMA Council on Med Ed & Hospitals, NBME • 1970 - American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)

  8. ABMS Purpose • Discuss common issues • Advise Boards • Coordinate work • Jurisdiction over policies as delegated • Autonomy of any Board • Stimulate improvements in med ed

  9. ABMS • 24 Boards • 37 Primary specialties • 94 Subspecialties • 2005 ~89% licensed US MDs • Evanston, IL • Kevin Weiss, MD, EVP • www.abms.org

  10. ABMS MISSION • Improve quality of medical care • Professional and educational standards for certification • Assurance to the public • Certification has meaning and required components

  11. ABMS & Member Boards • Assess • Education, Training, Licensure, Ethical and professional requirements • Initial examination • Construction-fair, objective • Psychometrically reliable and valid • Assess knowledge & clinical skills

  12. Limits of Board Certification • Assesses only medical knowledge • Snapshot SOLUTION? • Recertification • Time limited certification • Maintenance of Certification (MOC)

  13. Evolution from Certification to MOC 1936 1969 2006 2016 Unlimited Certification Time-Limited MOC Re-Certification

  14. ABMS • 1993 Member Boards agree to Recertification • 1997/98 ABPath Voluntary Recertification

  15. 1998 ABMS Task Force on Competency • Mission statement—Diplomates are competent • Define competence • Research and assessment, validation • Template to assess competence • Peer review of certification • Collaborative methods of assessment

  16. GOALS • MOC Relevant • Accountability for competence • Accountability for practice quality • Reshape Continuing Medical Education • MOC is Essential; Tied to: • Hospital Credentialing • Maintenance of Licensure • Pay for Performance

  17. Three Trends Make MOC Relevant • Public wants accountability for performance • Purchaser decision about quality • Quality can be measured • Patient’s perceptions and health status • Guideline adherence and achieving outcomes • Quality can be improved • Health care results from system • Change system processes improves care

  18. Relevance of MOC For A Composite Measure of Physician Quality • Customers • Healthcare purchasers & patients • Health plans, medical staffs, group practices • Competitors • National Committee for Quality Assessment • Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services • Doctor Quality web sites • Collaborators • JCAHO • State Medical Boards/FSMB

  19. Autonomy Collaboration Authority Evidence Assertion Measurement Control Transparency Changing View of Professionalism

  20. Accountability • Develop evidence of achieving best results for patient care • Communicate results regularly and widely to those to whom accountability is owed Profession Public

  21. ABMS & ACGMELifetime Competencies • MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE • PATIENT CARE • INTERPERSONAL & COMMUNICATION SKILLS • PROFESSIONALISM • PRACTICE BASED LEARNING & IMPROVEMENT • SYSTEMS BASED PRACTICE

  22. MOC – A Composite Measure of Competence and Quality Safe Timely Efficient Effective Equitable Patient Centered Competencies IOM Quality Aims

  23. Evolution of MOC • 1936--Certification • Training • Competence/Practice • Examination • 2006 - Maintenance of Certification • Certification after training • Milestone evidence of competence • Professional standing • Lifelong learning & self-assessment • Cognitive expertise • Practice performance & improvement • Can apply to all certificates • Single credential • Board Certification • Maintenance of License • Hospital Privileges • Public accountability • 1998 Voluntary Recertification • CME • License & privileges • Examination (optional)

  24. American Board of Pathology • 1936 Michigan • Primary Certification • AP/CP, AP, CP • Subspecialty certification • 10 • ACGME approved fellowship • Change in training requirements

  25. AMERICAN BOARD OF PATHOLOGY • PRIMARY CERTIFICATION • ANATOMIC & CLINICAL PATHOLOGY • ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY • CLINICAL PATHOLOGY

  26. AMERICAN BOARD OF PATHOLOGY- SUBSPECIALTY • Blood Banking/Transfusion Medicine • Chemical Pathology • Cytopathology • Dermatopathology* • Forensic Pathology • Hematology • Medical Microbiology • Molecular Genetic Pathology* • Neuropathology • Pediatric Pathology

  27. ABP Cooperating Societies • ACLPS • ADASP • AMA Pathology Section Council • APC • ASCP • ASIP • CAP • USCAP

  28. Maintenance of Certification • ABMS initiative • All 24 specialty boards • 2006 -Time-limited (10 year) primary and subspecialty certificates • Participation in MOC process required • Completed within 8-10 years

  29. ABMS BoardsRecertification

  30. MOC Components • Professional Standing • Lifelong Learning & Self-Assessment • Cognitive Expertise (the EXAM!) • Evaluation of Performance in Practice

  31. Part IProfessional Standing • Maintenance of a full and unrestricted license in at least one U.S. jurisdiction, territory, or Canada • Documentation of medical staff membership and privileges or, if not applicable, scope of practice • Documentation of licensure and medical staff privileges at 4th and 8th year

  32. Part IILife Long Learning- Self-Assessment • 70 Category 1 CME credits / 2 year cycle • 20 CME credits / 2 yr cycle must be SAMs • 80% CME related to individual’s practice • Updated electronic record of activities every 2 years • A fellowship fulfills Part II requirements for 2 year period • Incomplete fellowships prorated

  33. Part IILife Long Learning and Self-Assessment • Content specifications • Important advancements, key concepts • Basis for CME and self-assessment • Prep for MOC exam. • Direct MOC test question development • Practical “need to know” information, used in daily practice, required for competence • Cover all disciplines of pathology

  34. Part IILife Long Learning-Self-Assessment • AP and CP Content Committees’ “Content Outlines” on line, updated annually • Fundamental information for daily practice; important, validated new knowledge • Outlines are not templates for exam or endorsements of authors

  35. Self-Assessment Modules (SAMs) • Elements of SAMs • Educational product • Self-administered exam • Minimum performance level • Feedback • SAM requirement for 2006-09 period waived because of insufficient offerings • Certificates issued by societies should reflect regular CME versus CME / SAM

  36. Part III--Cognitive Expertise • Examination is mandatory • “Secure” and closed book • At least once per year • Taken 8-10 years after initial certification • Potential 3 year period of qualification

  37. Part III - Cognitive Expertise • Modular exams related to practice • Exams will include: • Fundamental knowledge • Current practice-related knowledge • Emphasis on information new to field • Practice environment knowledge

  38. Part IIICognitive Expertise • AP/CP certified individuals may chose to maintain their certification in AP/CP, AP only or CP only • Individuals with subspecialty certification may choose to maintain only their subspecialty certification

  39. Part IIICognitive Expertise MOC exam: • “tailor” exam to practice by selecting modules. • Menu of multiple modules • At least one general module of AP or CP must be selected by AP/CP examinees

  40. Part III - Cognitive ExpertiseMOC EXAM • 6 modules of 25 questions (150 total questions) • 80% practical (virtual microscopy, case-based questions etc); 20% written • Modules graded as one exam

  41. AP/CP MOC Exam + + + + 4 add. = 6 total + 3 add. = 6 total + 3 add. = 6 total Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 CP General module AP Specialty module

  42. AP only MOC Exam CP only MOC Exam + + oror or or or or or or or or 3 max 6 total 6 total CP General module Specialty module AP

  43. ModulesClinical Pathology

  44. ModulesAnatomic Pathology Revised 11/08

  45. Revised 11/08 ModulesAnatomic Pathology cont’d

  46. Revised 11/08 Common Modules*Anatomic and Clinical Pathology * May be used to fulfill AP or CP specialty modules

  47. Part III—Exam & MOC Myths • High stakes—Low failure rate • Irrelevant—Modular • Not useful—Improves MK, Pt. Care • Time consuming—Payoff- meet pt and regulatory expectations for quality, accountability, self-regulation

  48. Part IV. Evaluation of Performance in Practice • Demo to pts, public, profession • Safe, effective, pt centered, timely, efficient, equitable health care • Improve quality of PC • CI of practice performance • Evaluate • Individual physician performance

  49. Part IV. Evaluation of Performance in Practice - ABMS Principles • Phase-in; evaluate effectiveness; improve • Reflect activities of diplomate • Assessment based on • EBM/guidelines • Expert consensus • Normative peer comparisons

More Related