1 / 13

Gordon Dehler

Some Starting Assumptions. > Learning [Sotto 1994]:- is a struggle [i.e., difficult]- extends beyond telling facts [or remembering]- is constructed [not transferred]- is meaning making [takes on shape/pattern]- leads to understanding [contextualized] - transforms knowledge [Dehler 1996]> Critical Pedagogy:- Roles/responsibilities: make values transparent - Uncover hidden assumptions [e.g., in texts]- Challenge taken-for-granteds- Acknowledge impact of power .

bernad
Download Presentation

Gordon Dehler

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Gordon Dehler Integrative Learning and Criticality: Enhancing Complicated Understanding

    3. Agenda: Guiding Questions 1] Is there a difference between ‘critical thinking’ and ‘thinking critically’? If so, what’s a working definition of each? 2] What do we, as educators, hope to achieve by encouraging students to think critically? 3] What strategies, in the classroom and across the curriculum, encourage thinking, reflecting and acting critically? 4] What is the role of critical theory in promoting critical thought? 5] What are some examples to prime thinking?

    4. Is ‘Critical Thinking’ Different from ‘Thinking Critically’? > Critical Thinking: - A disciplined approach to problem solving [Reynolds 1999] - Analytical thinking, problem solving, reflective judgment, applied logic, practical reasoning [Bok 2006] > Thinking Critically: - challenging ideology, congesting hegemony, unmasking power, overcoming alienation, learning liberation, reclaiming reason [Brookfield 2005]

    5. Shared Pedagogical Objectives [Gordon and Ann] > Promote Complicated Understanding - Increase the variety of ways [the world] can be understood Develop an understanding by integrating multiple perspectives [rational/political/cultural-symbolic] > Pedagogical Assumptions re Organizations Democratization: flat/networked/heterarchical Multiplicity of voices: diversity in all forms - Emancipation: student as agent of social change

    6. Some [Quick!] Examples: Thinking/Reflecting/Acting Critically > Classroom Topic: Walmart ! - Thinking critically [Dehler, Welsh & Lewis 2001] > Action Research course - Reflecting critically [Dehler 2006] > Honors course on globalization - Acting critically [Dehler 2009] > Cross-disciplinary Studio course - Critical pedagogy [Welsh, Dehler & Murray 2007]

    7. Wal-Mart and Teaching Points: Critical Views and Problematics Professor as agent of business [?] Pedagogical assumptions clear: emancipatory aims Obscure power relations Legitimate power of management Reinforce extant power relations to perpetuate status quo Conflate ‘rationality’ w/ value preferences Privilege capital over labor [a value, not ‘fact’] Attach labels to alternative views Marginalize dissenting views as ‘biased’ Trivialize attempts to challenge taken-for-granteds Deny existence of points of tension

    8. Course Examples: [graduate] Action Research Capstone - Problem ? knowledge/theory - Explicit critical theoretic component [Undergraduate] Honors Course - Multi-disciplinary - Reflect critically on learning - Critical action: Social change initiative Key: Course Design [build in ‘critical’]

    9. Learning Tasks of Critical Theory* A Studio Example > Cross-disciplinary project collaboration - Industrial design, business, engineering > Three Challenges: 1] Unmasking power: disparate power as natural 2] Learning liberation: new forms of organization 3] Reclaiming reason: cope with messy situations *[Brookfield 2005] The Power of Critical Theory.

    10. Some Key Questions > What pedagogical strategies do/could you use to teach critical thought in your class? > If thinking critically was the goal of a curriculum, as a whole, what principles could be established that all faculty could adhere to [e.g., no multiple choice exams]? > How would educators know if they were fostering critical thought?

    11. Redux: Learning Tasks of Critical Theory > Challenging ideology: ‘common sense’ > Contesting hegemony: maintain political control > Unmasking power: disparate power as natural [somebody has to be in charge] > Overcoming alienation: constraints on freedom > Learning liberation: new forms of organization > Reclaiming reason: coping with messy situations > Practicing democracy: tyranny of the majority

    12. Wrapping Up: What We’ve Done > Working definitions of critical thinking vs. thinking critically > Goal of fostering critical thought in a variety of contexts [not just business schools/our domain] > Strategies for fostering critical thought in the class and across the curriculum > Role of critical theory in facilitating critical thought

    13. Selected References Barnett, R. (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham, UK: Open U. Press. Bok, D. (2006) Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Brookfield, S.D. (1995) The skillful teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Brookfield, S.D. (2005) The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Dehler, G.E. (2009) Prospects and possibilities of critical management education: Critical beings and a pedagogy of critical action. Management Learning, 40(1): 31-49. Dehler, G.E. (1996) Management education as intentional learning: A knowledge transforming approach to written communication. Journal of Management Education, 20(2): 221-235. Dehler, G.E., Welsh, M.A. & Lewis, M.W. (2001) Critical pedagogy in the 'new paradigm': Raising complicated understanding in management learning. Management Learning, 32(4): 493-511. Freire, P. (1970/1993) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. Martin, R. (2007) How successful business leaders think. Harvard Business Review, June. Reynolds, M. (1997) ‘Towards a Critical Management Pedagogy’, in J. Burgoyne and M. Reynolds (eds) Management Learning: Integrating Perspectives in Theory and Practice, pp. 312-28. London: Sage. Shor, I. (2000) ‘Introduction: (Why) Education is Politics’, in I. Shor and C. Pari (eds) Education is Political: Critical Teaching across Differences, Postsecondary, pp. 1-15. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook. Shor, I. (1996) When Students Have Power: Negotiating Authority in a Critical Pedagogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sotto, E. (1994) When teaching becomes learning: A theory and practice of teaching. London: Continuum. Welsh, M.A., Dehler, G.E. & Murray, D.L. (2007) Learning about and through experience: Understanding the power of experience-based education. In M. Reynolds & R. Vince (Eds.), Handbook of experiential learning & management education, pp. 53-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Welsh, M. A. and Dehler, G. E. (2004) ‘P(l)aying Attention: Communities of Practice and Organized Reflection’, in M. Reynolds and R. Vince (eds) Organizing Reflection, pp. 15-29. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. Welsh, M. A. and Murray, D. (2003) ‘The Ecocollaborative: Using Critical Pedagogy to Teach Sustainability’, Journal of Management Education 27: 220-235.

More Related