Quantitative Data A nalysis 2

1 / 15

# Quantitative Data A nalysis 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EDUC 894 Week 11. Quantitative Data A nalysis 2. Plan for Today. Report # 3 In Inferential Statistics Big Ideas Discussion --------------------Dinner Break------------------- Calculating and Interpreting Statistics For next week: Exhale, you’ve jut handed in Report #3!

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Quantitative Data A nalysis 2' - benny

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
EDUC 894

Week 11

### Quantitative Data Analysis 2

Plan for Today
• Report # 3 In
• Inferential Statistics
• Big Ideas Discussion

--------------------Dinner Break-------------------

• Calculating and Interpreting Statistics
• For next week:
• Exhale, you’ve jut handed in Report #3!
• Read Goddard & Feynman (we’ll spend time next class discussing the implications for your reports)
• Start Research Reflection?
Analyzing Quantitative Data – Key Concerns
• #1 Concern: What are you trying to find out? What questions do you want to ask the data?
• #2 Concern: How can a set of number used to represent some aspects of the world be organized to help you answer that question?
• #3 Concern: Are there any issues with your data that might affect the validity of this answer?
Analyzing Quantitative Data – Key Process Steps
• Coding & Cleaning
• Descriptive Statistics
• We’re making statements about the actual people you collected data from (your sample)
• Inferential Statistics
• We’re trying to claim that what we found for our sample is likely to be true for some larger population
Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 1: The Big Decision

• In hypothesis testing, what is the “big decision” that needs to be made? Why is this important and what does it mean? What are the dangers we worry about in making this decision?
Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 1: The Big Decision

• Do we always want to reject H0?
• Are we always comparing 2 groups?
• Is rejecting H0 the same as saying that HA is true?
• How does effect size influence our decision on whether or not to reject H0 ?
• How do you know when you make a Type I or Type II error?
Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 2: Which way? (dir/non-dir hyp)

• What is the difference between directional and non-directional hypotheses? How does this choice affect the statistics (conceptually?) Based on this, which is a better kind of hypothesis to use?
Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 2: Which way? (dir/non-dir hyp)

• How does the directionality of the hypothesis affect the p-value?
• How does the directionality of the hypothesis affect the likelihood of making a Type I or Type II error?
• If you only expect a treatment to make a small difference, should you use a one-tailed test?
Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 3: Statistical vs. Practical Sig

• What is the difference between statistical significance (think of a t-test) and practical significance (think of effect size)? What kinds of claims does each one let you make? Which one do you think is more important and why?
Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 3: Statistical vs. Practical Sig

• “Both are important - there is little point in getting excited by a large effect size when there is a high likelihood that chance plays a role in the difference, or that a study has high statistical significance, but a small effect size.”

-M. Chu, 2008

Inferential Statistics:Discussion Questions

Question 3: Statistical vs. Practical Sig

• Two stop-smoking treatments were each tested against a control group for the average # of cigarettes smoked by people in the group after the treatment.
• ClearSkies produced a significant result at the .05 level (p<.05)
• SmokeByeBye produced a significant result at the .01 level (p<.01)
• Can you have statistical significance without practical significance?