PREMIS & Geospatial Resources

1. Stanford Digital Repository PREMIS & Geospatial Resources Nancy J. HoebelheinrichKnowledge MotifsSan Mateo, CA PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

2. Outline • Brief descriptions: • High Resolution orthoimagery (HRO) • GIS dataset • Complexities using PREMIS for these Geospatial Resources • Further investigations PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

3. Description: Collection of various files comprising a classic “shapefile” Additional files created by SW for rendering Curatorial Decisions: What is to be archived? For what purpose? What is context for the artifact? How much of context should be archived? High Resolution Orthoimagery (HRO): Monterey Bay Aquariam PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

4. Description: Compilation of data “layers” Only certain data points featured from layers Output: Image as tourist map MS Access “personal geodatabase” Curatorial Decisions: What is to be archived? For what purpose? What is context for the artifact? How much of context should be archived? Compiled GIS Dataset: Network of San Francisco Bay Area = “snapshot” PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

5. Structural Aspects Contextual Aspects: Function / purpose of data subset created Provenance: what’s important to record Events to be recorded Application of PREMIS to HRO & GIS Dataset: complexities PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

6. Dependent upon archival unit ?map output ?compiled dataset output as .mdb ?each layer component ?all of the above how determine relationships – got MD? Use of <object>relationship Or, Use of METS Both Application of PREMIS to GIS Dataset: Structure of artifact PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

7. Intention: To make earth science data useful to the scientific community, *longterm* Earth science data community emphasizing the importance of context & provenance Application of PREMIS to GIS Dataset: Context & Provenance with artifact PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

8. “As necessary the processing software, instrument operations history and related science documentation Information intended to support understanding and use of the data in the long term (i.e., after instrument operations end) Standard linkages among the critical data and instrument information, including provenance information” NOTE: Lineage or “provenance” data considered as the processing steps used to create scientific data product Guidance from NASA & NOAA: fromUS Global Change Climate Report PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

9. Instrument/ sensor characteristics such as performance measurements calibration data & method Processing algorithms & their scientific basis for creation of the product, for example Bibliography of pertinent Technical Notes and articles reporting on research using the data set Feedback from users of the dataset etc., Guidance from NASA & NOAA: more specifically, e.g., PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

10. <object> significantProperties using extension element? objectCharacteritics using extension element Use elements from domain specific MD standards, e.g, FGDC *see ref in Sources North American Profile of ISO 19115:2003 – Geographic Information, Metadata Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Context & Provenance in PREMIS – where? PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

11. For more detail on using domain specific metadata, see “An Investigation into Archiving Geospatial data Formats “ prepared for NGDA Project, funded by NDIIPP (http://www.ngda.org/research.php) Approaches of FGDC, PREMIS, and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)‘s Geospatial Electronic Record (GER) model on basis of: Environment/ computer platform Semantic underpinnings domain specific terminology provenance data quality appropriate use PREMIS & Complex Geospatial Data PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

12. What influenced or impacted the creation of the dataset to understand the data Addition of metadata to the resource, e.g., USGS which added FGDC MD to HRO from Monterey Bay Water Resource <event> Context & Provenance in PREMIS – where? Example Event to be documented: Merge c:\temp\states1;c:\temp \states2; c:\temp\USA PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

13. ?Agency adding descriptive MD to HRO, e.g., USGS’ addition of descriptive info from the Monterey Water District <agent> Context & Provenance in PREMIS – where? PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

14. Implementation issues • Heavy emphasis upon receiving documentation, metadata, and reference materials at time of creation and/or acquisition from: • governmental agency sponsoring • research scientists creating • In order to do this practicably, need to be able to determine factors for creation / archiving the artifact. -- include link to taxonomy in the PREMIS schema in lieu of TYPE semantic unit • How? • Chance of being built into tools eventually, e.g., GeoMedia, ESRI ArcGIS tools • In process of building domain concensus of importance of archiving PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

15. Further investigations • ESIP Federation – building a MD testbed for preservation MD (NOAA & NASA, etc.,) • American Geophysical Union position statement & follow-up • NDIIPP geospatial projects including NGDA and collaborative states • Discussions of “significant properties / characteristics” Dappert, Farquhar article PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

16. Sources • US Global Change Research Program: www.knmi.nl/.../DSWG_Aura2009_Moses_ArchivingAuraData2009.ppt • “An Investigation into Archiving Geospatial data Formats “ prepared for NGDA Project, funded by NDIIPP (http://www.ngda.org/research.php) • NAP – ISO 19113:2003 http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/incits-l1-standards-projects/NAP-Metadata • ESIP Federationhttp://www.esipfed.org/ • Preserving the Context of Science Data. Greg Janée and James Frew (2008). Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union89(53), Fall Meeting Supplement, abstract U13D-06. • Preserving Geospatial Data: The National Geospatial Digital Archive's Approach. Greg Janée (2009). Archiving 2009: Final Program and Proceedings (Arlington, Virginia; May 4-7, 2009): 25-29. • Significance is in the Eye of the Stakeholder, Angela Dappert, Adam Farquhar, The British Library (2009) PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009

17. Questions? / comments? Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich nhoebel@kmotifs.com PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA, October 7 2009