1 / 28

Resource Needs and Funding for Health Systems

Resource Needs and Funding for Health Systems. Professor Brook K. Baker Health GAP (Global Access Project) Northeastern U. School of Law, Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy

benjamin
Download Presentation

Resource Needs and Funding for Health Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Resource Needs and Funding for Health Systems Professor Brook K. Baker Health GAP (Global Access Project) Northeastern U. School of Law, Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy Seminar: Right to Health: Challenges in Funding, Health Systems and Universal Access in Development Policies, Madrid, Spain June 2, 2010

  2. Outline of Presentation • Current global health spending: domestic health spending and development/donor assistance for health. • Global health resource needs and financing gaps. • Campaigning for adequate and sustained donor financing for health – what should we be doing?

  3. Health Spending in Developing Countries with 92% of Global Disease Burden is Anemic • 2004, global health spending $4.1 trillion • 2003, dev. country health spending $410 billion World Bank Strategy for HNP Results 2007. • 2005, health spending in SSA $27 billion. GHWA Education (2008). • Out of pocket – 70% in LICs 50% in African countries)

  4. Domestic Resources for Health:Abuja 15% Commitment; New Revenues • At the end of 2009, only six African countries had ever met their 2001 Abuja Declaration commitment to spend 15% of their budget on health. • Countries must also pursue a job-growth and domestic revenue agenda • Resource extraction fees • Tax avoidance and capital flight • Pro-growth, job-creation policies

  5. Would Meeting Abuja 15% Make a Difference?USAID Roundtable (2008)

  6. Donor/Development Assistance for Health • DAH estimates vary depending on what is included. • Actual disbursements are generally significantly less than commitments. • A large portion of DAH never hits the ground.

  7. Kaiser Estimates – DAH 2001-2007

  8. DAH by Major Component

  9. 2007 DAH by Sub-Sector (Kaiser 2009)

  10. Development Assistance for Health1990-2007 Lancet 2009; 373: 2113–24

  11. Allocation of ODA to Health Has Increased

  12. But, ODA has stagnated since 2005

  13. Increasing Donor Assistance for Health is Essential • “Massive increases in external assistance are needed” to finance MDG health goals. (WB, Health Financing Revisited 2006) • Old estimates of resource needs (CMH & World Bank) range between $25 billion and $70 billion in additional aid, per year, to meet MDG health goals. Ibid. • 2009 estimates from the Task Force on Innovative Financing has calculated additional global health resource needs for LICs alone of $45 billion by 2015. • These estimates may be far low, esp. when all dev. countries are included.

  14. How big is the gap?Who will pay?

  15. TOTAL DEVELOPING COUNTRY HEALTH RESOURCE NEEDS AND GAP 2009-2015 (Baker, 2010)

  16. Recurrent Dilemmas in DAH • Earmarks & conditionalities. • Only 20% to government budget support. • Over 50% is off budget and not available to support the health system or to pay recurrent public sector costs: staff, infrastructure, training, management, etc. • Very high overhead costs, small percentage hits the ground • Unpredictable, short-term and volatile.

  17. Recurrent Dilemmas in DAH • Lack of coordination/harmonization. • Tied aid and donor-provided technical assistance. • Overhead losses. • Corruption and inefficiency in recipient bureaucracies.

  18. Subadditionality • Donor health aid is often fungible, meaning that countries can disinvest in health at the same time that donors are investing, usually as a result of IMF/ministry of finance macroeconomic restraint policies and misguided government spending priorities.

  19. IMF Macroeconomic Fundamentalism

  20. IMF Macroeconomic Fundamentalism

  21. Hydraulic Pressure → Subadditionality • On average, 37% of all additional aid was indirectly diverted to increase foreign currency reserves; another 37% was diverted to reduce domestic debt; only 27% was actually spent. Figure A2.9.

  22. Poorer, Weaker Countries Spent Even Less • Good performers (low inflation, high reserves) spent 49%, weak performers only 17%.

  23. Poorer, Weaker Countries Spent Even Less • Good performers (low inflation, high reserves) spent 49%, weak performers only 17%.

  24. Sub-Sub-Additionality • New study shows that for every $1 of foreign aid, governments may have reduced their own spending, on average, by $1.14! • Lu et al., Lancet (2010). • An unpublished study finds a high correlation between subadditionality and IMF loans.

  25. Health Spending Faces Competition: Food and Fuel Shocks 2007-2008 • Food prices went up 83% from 2005-2008 and have remained high • Oil increased over 300% 2003-08 but has fallen back since • Global food resource needs estimated between $20-30 billion a year. • These price shocks had adverse effects on imported inflation, government spending, and currency reserves

  26. Global Recession and Climate Control • Current financial crisis: lower remittances, fewer exports, eroded terms of trade, lower tax revenue; increased debt, lowered reserves • Climate control and mitigation resource needs - $100 billion/year. • Global Fund needs $20 billion 2011-2013 • PEPFAR flat-funded FY 2009-2011 What are the prospects for increased resources for health?

  27. Campaigning for Global Health Funding • Mobilizing and allocating domestic resources for health – long overdue • Donor achievement of .7% ODA, including .1% for health – long overdue • Innovative financing for health, esp. CTL/FTT for health – an idea whose time has come. • Attacking IMF macroeconomic constraints and achieving additionality – long overdue

More Related