1 / 9

Shower library

Shower library. Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP. Outline. Reconstruction procedure Shower shape 2 approaches Shower library Volume merging Errors Results and next steps. First approximation energy calibration position S-curves Cluster unfolding shower shape shower library.

Download Presentation

Shower library

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shower library Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP

  2. Outline • Reconstruction procedure • Shower shape • 2 approaches • Shower library • Volume merging • Errors • Results and next steps

  3. First approximation energy calibration position S-curves Cluster unfolding shower shape shower library LHCb like methods Pure γ, no background Simple and easy to check Test site for shower library routines Can be done in few month Procedure of γ reconstruction Done • ALICE-like methods • Require much more effort • CALO parameters should be fixed? From September 2006 CBM collaboration meeting

  4. Shower shape • Analytical formula for shower shape approximation • ALICE and PHENIX experience • No memory consumption • Best for multicore CPU • Poor quality for large incident angles • Shower library • Fits exactly to the data • Requires a lot of memory • (and CPU!) • Any incident angle • Shower width • Also needed for fitting procedure • Approximation or storing in library?

  5. Shower library • ECAL with very high segmentation (1x1mm2 volumes) • use one shower multiple times • volumes merging procedure • Transport photons for every: • Energy • Theta • Phi • Eightfold decrease due to symmetry • For low energies we have to generate more showers • Larger fluctuations for low energy showers • 10k for 0.49 GeV • 2k for 16GeV

  6. During shower library creation Also can store RMS (see next slide) Bigger library size Cell size fixed Different data set for each cell size Cluster size fixed During reconstruction More CPU required during reconstruction Information about RMS is lost Need analytical approximation for errors Homogenous dataset Cell size not fixed Volumes merging

  7. Error treating h4 • Energy deposition in cluster cells are not independent • RMS value storing • ALICE and PHENIX • Error ~sqrt(Ei) • (1-Ei/E0) for correlation treatment • E0 measured cluster energy h5 h5 h4

  8. Shower library • 170 Mb disk space • 300 Mb in memory • Energy: 0.49, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16 GeV • Theta: 2˚, 3.5˚, 5˚, 6.5˚, 8˚, 9.5˚, 11˚, 13˚, 16˚, 20˚, 24˚, 28˚, 32˚ • Phi: 0˚, 10˚ , 20˚, 30˚, 40˚

  9. Next steps for shower library • Rotation on fly • classical trade CPU vs. memory • Memory-CPU bottleneck • Approximation • Are there any?

More Related