Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: NFI & ES Jan 18 th , 2012. Blue Nile, South Kordofan, Abyei. CHF Geographical priorities Ensure emergency response capacity within the sector is maintained for :. CHF Sector Priorities:. Sector strategy for addressing the priorities.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
1st Round Sector Defense
Sector: NFI & ES
Jan 18th , 2012
CHF Geographical priorities
Ensure emergency response capacity within the sector is maintained for:
Avoid pipeline breaks and maintain emergency preparedness and response capacity- adequate funding for transportation; timely procurement (secured)
Ensure critical gaps are covered -
Support national partners to apply for independent funding
Support capacity building for sector partners
Empower local populations and reduce aid dependency
Of the 1.9 million IDPs estimated in Darfur, the Sector has identified (based on needs assessments from previous distributions) 95,000 households (approximately 570,000 people) in Darfur thatrequire seasonal replenishment items. Contingency stocks for an estimated 5,000 households per month maintained for newly displaced due to conflict /disaster and returnees (target based on historical data)
In the Rest of Sudan, the Sector target is 119,000 households (approximately 714,000 people) displaced/potential returnees in SKS, BNS, NKS, Sennar, and White Nile State (based on the Contingency Planning figures of September 2011)
CHF funding is critical right now to meet these sector priorities. Without funding for 6 months:
Highest score for average distribution costs per household served were capped at: 12 – 16 US$ for INGO; 5 – 8 US$ NNGO. Extra allowance for rural /deep field locations - Category ‘C”.
Highest score where more of the budget went directly to beneficiaries. In the case of partners that do assessments and distribute NFIs from the common Pipeline, staff costs were considered essential operational costs
Priority for National NGOs operating in gap areas, with minimal operating costs and proven capacity to deliver
Sector coordination of the NFI common Pipeline partners ensures no overlap in activities (i.e. double-dipping) geographic gaps are covered and beneficiaries receive timely assistance with WFPLCU’s target turnaround time for NFI requests of 7 calendar days
Core pipeline allocation (early funding received)– US$2,860,752
Additional recommended Sector Envelope: US$2 million
Total Sector requested: US$ 8,950,852
Total TRG-recommended Sector Envelope: US$ 4,860,752
Total projects proposals: 26
Total projects recommended for funding: 16
Sector Envelope Including Core Pipeline:
UN +IOM- 67%; INGO - 18%; NNGO - 15%