1 / 20

Significant results of reef surveys and long-term monitoring on South African marginal reefs

Significant results of reef surveys and long-term monitoring on South African marginal reefs Michael Schleyer, Louis Celliers & Alke Kruger Oceanographic Research Institute, P.O. Box 10712, Marine Parade, Durban 4056, South Africa schleyer@ori.org.za. LOCAL SPHERE OF OPERATIONS

becky
Download Presentation

Significant results of reef surveys and long-term monitoring on South African marginal reefs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Significant results of reef surveys and long-term monitoring on South African marginal reefs Michael Schleyer, Louis Celliers & Alke Kruger Oceanographic Research Institute, P.O. Box 10712, Marine Parade, Durban 4056, South Africa schleyer@ori.org.za

  2. LOCAL SPHERE OF OPERATIONS Only ~40 km2 coral reef over 120 km In three reef complexes + some scattered reef Marginal, high-latitude, non-accretive; 8-27 m All in MPAs & WHS

  3. Taxonomy Biodiversity Coral reproduction Reef damage & sustainable capacity Recruitment COTS Natural products Oceanography Coral genetics Coral bleaching Reef surveys Reef monitoring ACTIVITIES

  4. BIODIVERSITY Most abundant genera: Sinularia, Lobophytum, Favia, Favites, Montipora and Echinopora High level of endemism

  5. REEF SURVEYS(Essential due to increasing use) • Digital imaging • 7 years to complete • 4.2 GB of data

  6. Coral Community Structure • 20 communities at 55% similarity • e.g. Cluster: • 11 Acropora-rich Kosi

  7. Zonation for Use (Based on coral sensitivity to damage, reef carrying capacity and depth) N : Shallow, snorkellers L : Learner divers U : General use RA : Advanced divers RE : Experienced divers RS : Special biota S : Sancuaries Kosi

  8. N S Kosi Rabbit Rock Sodwana complex Red Sands, Leadsman

  9. MONITORING (1993 – present) CLIMATE CHANGE

  10. Nine-mile Reef

  11. Temperature Data Bleaching 0.27°C p.a.

  12. CORAL BLEACHING • In 2000 • Affected <12% cover • Mainly Montipora, Alveopora & Acropora • 9.5 weeks @ ≥27.5ºC • 4 days @ ≥28.8ºC Celliers & Schleyer, 2002

  13. Reef top Quadrats standardised by calibration & correction (mean error = 2.0%, range 1.2 - 2.8%) Reef-sediment interface

  14. 1993 1996 1998 Transect C (reef-sediment) 2001

  15. Transect E (reef top) 1993 1996 2001 1998

  16. % Cover for all transects

  17. Total number of recruits and mortality Bleaching Recruitment success

  18. CONCLUSIONS: • · South African reefs are limited, marginal and manifest a gradient in community structure • Climate change  sea warming  soft to hard corals  bleaching threshold • This appears to be “silently” affecting coral recruitment success • · Future aragonite saturation state,  reef formation, hard corals • · Studies on SA reefs may elucidate the relationship between these complex mechanisms and provide an insight to the global future of corals

More Related