html5-img
1 / 29

District Assessment & Accountability Data

District Assessment & Accountability Data. State Testing and Reporting (STAR) California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services. Agenda.

bat
Download Presentation

District Assessment & Accountability Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. District Assessment & Accountability Data State Testing and Reporting (STAR)California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)Academic Performance Index (API)Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services

  2. Agenda • California Standards Tests (CST) Results • Spring 2011 • 5-year comparison • California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results • 10th Grade 2011 results compared to State results • 3-year comparison • State Accountability: Academic Performance Index (API) • 5-year trend data & growth • School performance • Federal Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • AYP Targets • District Performance

  3. STAR 2011 Group Performance – California Standards Test (CST)

  4. STAR Multi-Year Performance Level Distribution Mathematics English/Language Arts

  5. STAR Multi-Year Performance Level Distribution Biology Science

  6. STAR Multi-Year Performance Level Distribution History World History

  7. CAHSEE – 10th Grade ELACompared to State

  8. CAHSEE – 10th Grade MathCompared to State

  9. CAHSEE ELAThree-Year Comparison

  10. CAHSEE MathThree-Year Comparison

  11. State Accountability: Academic Performance Index (API) GOAL: All schools and districts will achieve the statewide performance target of 800 or above.

  12. State Accountability:Academic Performance Index (API) • What is the API? • Growth (CST, CMA, CAPA) model • Far Below Basic 200 • Below Basic 500 (+300) • Basic 700 (+200) • Proficient 875 (+175) • Advanced 1000 (+125) • CAHSEE • No Pass 200 • Pass 1000 (+800) • What does the API Indicate?

  13. Academic Performance Index2010-11

  14. Academic Performance Index5 Year Growth

  15. Academic Performance Index 5 Year Growth – Significant Sub-Groups

  16. Academic Performance IndexSchools

  17. Federal Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) GOAL: 100% of all students tested will be proficient in English-Language Arts and Mathematics by 2014.

  18. Adequate Yearly Progress • There is ONE way to make AYP. • District/school and all sub-groups meet all targets • There are up to 46 different ways for a school or district to miss AYP. • Participation Rate • Up to 11 sub-groups in ELA and up to 11 sub-groups in Math for a total of 22 ways • Percent Proficient • Up to 11 sub-groups in ELA and up to 11 sub-groups in Math for a total of 22 ways • API - Additional indicator for AYP • Graduation Rate at the high school level

  19. AYP Targets English Language Arts

  20. AYP Targets Mathematics

  21. Federal Accountability: AYP • What is AYP? • Status Model • Students must reach proficiency • How is AYP determined? • Elementary & Middle School: STAR in ELA and Math • High School: CAHSEE • 380 Scaled Score instead of 350 • API: Minimum of 680 • Graduation Rate: One year delayed

  22. English Language Arts 56.8% 67.6%

  23. Mathematics

  24. Adequate Yearly Progress • District met participation rates • Percent proficient – did not meet AYP targets in the following subgroups: • API – Met • Graduation Rate – Met (target: 86.4%) • 2009-10 89.66% • ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS • African American • Socio Economically Disadvantaged • MATHEMATICS • African American • Hispanic

  25. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary • Albany Unified School District met 30 of 34 AYP criteria • Did not make AYP for 2 years in a row (but different subgroups) • Two schools (out of five) made AYP • Cornell Elementary • Marin Elementary

  26. SummaryCST • AUSD continues to be a high-performing district with high-performing schools and students • However, over 20% of our students score at Basic or below in ELA and Math • That percentage rises in Science and History/Social Science

  27. Summary, continuedCAHSEE • AUSD exceeds the State in CAHSEE passage rates in both ELA and Math • Performance fell slightly for all subgroups in ELA in2011 • Performance held or increased slightly for all subgroups in Math (except English Learners)

  28. Summary, continuedAPI • AUSD has shown steady growth for the past three consecutive years, which tapered off slightly for 2011 • Many subgroups lost ground in 2011 • A few subgroups grew (ELs and Spec Ed) • API went up for 4 out of 6 schools

  29. Summary, continuedAYP • AUSD has made small, steady progress in % proficient or above overall • Subgroups are showing some gains, some losses (no apparent pattern) • Two subgroups met AYP through Safe Harbor • Spec Ed in ELA and Mathematics • SED in Mathematics • One school (AMS) has entered Program Improvement, Year 1

More Related