1 / 11

Evaluation Plan for Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System

Evaluation Plan for Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System. Prepared for the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction By: ● Josef Dvorak ● Daniel Marlin ● Christa Pugh ● Nels Rude ● Mai Choua Thao. Source: http://mashable.com/2012/07/23/technology-in-the-classroom/.

barid
Download Presentation

Evaluation Plan for Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation Plan for Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System Prepared for the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction By: ● Josef Dvorak ● Daniel Marlin ● Christa Pugh ●Nels Rude ●Mai ChouaThao Source: http://mashable.com/2012/07/23/technology-in-the-classroom/

  2. Background on Educator Evaluation Systems • ● Emerging evaluation systems • ● Multidimensional evaluation • measures • ● Value-added modeling (VAM) • and other evidence-based • metrics • ● Professional development • ● Summative & formative feedback Source: http://twiniversity.com/2013/12/what-teachers-really-want-for-christmas/

  3. Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System ●Statewide implementation in 2014 ● System goal: “Provide a performance based evaluation that leads to improved student learning by supporting continuous improvement of educator practice.” ●Project goals: ● Identify recommendations for evaluating the Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness (EE) System ● Inform creation of Request for Proposal (RFP)

  4. Logic Model

  5. Methodology • ● State selection criteria • ● Contacted all states with a statewide evaluation system • ● Found documentation from 15 states • ● Highlighted common • and novel practices • ● Four broad topics • of research

  6. Recommendations: Research Questions ● Implementation: How was the evaluation system enacted in each site? ● Educator perceptions: What were teachers’ and administrators’ perceptions of teacher evaluation and the classroom observation rubrics being implemented? ● Burdens of reform: What is being done in your school and/or school district to ensure the optimal implementation of the new teacher evaluation system? Source: http://www.c2mclean.com/smarter-students/elementary-school-students/

  7. Recommendations: Research Questions ● Changes to educator behavior: To what extent did participants perceive that initial implementation of the new teacher effectiveness measures resulted in teachers increasingly reflecting about their practice? ● Metric and process fidelity: Do the evaluations produce ratings that are appropriate, valid, and reliable? ● Student outcomes: What is the impact on student outcomes?

  8. Recommendations: Metrics • ● Implementation • ● Perceptions • The number of formal classroom observations was adequate to assess my performance. • ● Resources • I am confident that my district will provide me with the opportunities and resources to achieve system goals. • ● Quantitative measures • Number of teachers evaluated, median number of • observations per teacher • ● Educator outcomes • Whether teachers changed their educational • practices or increased collaboration • ● Student outcomes • Value-added modeling Source: http://3forward.com/sales-leaders-blog/tips-for-sales-managers-raising-sales-effectiveness/

  9. Recommendations: Data Collection • ● Qualitative • ● Surveys • ● Focus groups • ● Interviews • ● Quantitative • ● Stratified sampling Source: http://www.employeesurveys.com/

  10. Recommendations: Data Analysis ● Aggregate and publish survey, focus group, and interview data ● Statistical methods ● VAM ● Interrupted time-series model Source: http:/Moksony_Ferenc_Statistical_Methods_for_Program_Evaluation/ch07.html /www.tankonyvtar.hu/en/tartalom/tamop425/0010_2A_04_

  11. For further information: Contact the La Follette School’s publications office at 608-263-7657 or publications@lafollette.wisc.edu Or see www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workshops.html Thank you!

More Related