1 / 39

K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission

K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission. July 18, 2014 School Year 2012-13 Data. Kansas Student Population Trends (Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools). Subjects Assessed. 261,164 Reading (Grades 3-8, HS) 260,653 Math (Grades 3-8, HS)

Download Presentation

K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year 2012-13 Data

  2. Kansas Student Population Trends(Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools)

  3. Subjects Assessed • 261,164 Reading (Grades 3-8, HS) • 260,653 Math (Grades 3-8, HS) • 110,482 Science (Grades 4, 7, HS) • 48,717 KELPA (Grades K-12 )

  4. Early Comments on Results Graduation rates continue to increase, up from 83% to 84.9%, with the largest gains in our subgroups. Attendance rates are high at 94.9% Participation rates on assessments remain very close to 100%. For a second year in a row, student performance on state Math and Reading assessments declined.

  5. Reading

  6. Five Performance Levels Exemplary Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Approaches Standard Academic Warning

  7. Reporting “Standard & Above” • Reported percentages are totals of all students in the top three performance levels. Example from Reading, All Students: • Exemplary . . . . . . . 29.9 • Exceeds Standard . . 29.5 • Meets Standard . . . 25.3 % at Standard or Above = 84.7

  8. Reading Trends by Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

  9. Reading – Performance Levels

  10. Disaggregated Groups All students Males & females Ethnic groups Free & reduced lunch Students with disabilities English Language Learners

  11. Reading Gap by Percent Proficient, SES levels, 2000 – 2013, (report card population)

  12. Poverty Trends within Ethnic GroupsKansas public schools only, all grades and preschool, 2006-2013

  13. Reading Gaps by Percent Proficient & Ethnicity: 2000 – 2013(percent proficient, all grades, report card population)

  14. 18

  15. Math

  16. Math Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

  17. Math – Performance Levels

  18. Math Gap by Percent Proficient, SES levels,2000 – 2013, (report card population)

  19. Math Gap by Percent Proficient & Ethnicity, 2000 – 2012(report card population)

  20. Science – Grades Tested Grade 4 Grade 7 High School

  21. Science

  22. Science Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

  23. Science – Performance Levels

  24. Who are the students scoring below proficient? Let’s focus on the 4,743 third graders below proficient in 2011.

  25. Old vs. New Performance

  26. Highly Qualified Teachers • To be highly qualified, a teacher must be “fully” licensed & must demonstrate subject matter competence. • Competence is demonstrated by: • Content major, or • PRAXIS II content test, or • Rubric (content hours, content workshops, experience & other PD related to content area).

  27. Highly Qualified Teachers

  28. Percent of Classes Taught byHighly Qualified Teachers

  29. Personnel Changes Since 2008-09 637 fewer Licensed Personnel 163 more Special Education Teachers 51 more Kindergarten Teachers 974 fewer Other Teachers 154 fewer Library/Media Specialists 58 fewer School Counselors 11 fewer Superintendents 55 fewer Principals 233 fewer Non-Certified employees

  30. Other Measures • Graduation Rate (H.S. & districts) • Use the Adjusted four- and five-year cohort formulas • GED is not included • At least 80% or • If ≥ 50% but < 80%, 3% more than previous year • If < 50%, 5% more than previous year • Attendance Rate • Elementary school requirement • 90% or improvement over last year

  31. Graduation Rate 4-yr. adjusted cohort graduation formula

  32. Attendance Rate

  33. Questions?

More Related