SOLARGE - National market analysis for CSTS in 2005

1. SOLARGE - National market analysis for CSTS in 2005 Research design, research results and conclusions for SOLARGE 2006 Presentation by Christoph Urbschat, eclareon GmbH Anja Schlieder, eclareon GmbH Susanne Berger, Berliner Energieagentur GmbH The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not represent the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

2. 1. Research Design

3. Aims and objectives • WP 1 carries out a systematicoverview of national structures, policies and market situations in the relevant building sectors and collective solar heating potentials of the partner countries. • The analysis focuses on the main market obstacles and barriers for the implementation of CSTS. • The market studies create the basis to define strategies and concrete actions to be worked out in the following work packages to achieve the intended market stimulation for CSTS technologies. • They will also generate recommendations to policy makers on how to overcome market barriers.

4. National housing and hotel sector • National building stock • Used heating systems • Refurbishment and new construction activities • Actors involvement in solar obstacles obstacles National legislative and economic framework National energy policy framework CSTSimplementation • Energy prices • Capital market terms for this kind of investments • Legal conditions for refurbishment activities • Building sector regulations • National energy policy • National administration • National incentives for CSTS barriers barriers National solar industry • Market history – has market and industry for CSTS developed? • Micro: commercial products available? Market model for analysis

5. Work programme 2005

6. Data Collection / Structuring SOLARGE Macro profiles Assessment Comparative Analysis Deliverables December 2005 Available PDFs for public dissemination Brochure Presentation Country profiles

7. 2. Country research results - status 2005

8. 1. Spain (1)

9. 1. Spain (2) Penetration of individual (per dwelling) and centralized (per apartment building) heating equipment in different regions Source: INE, 2001 Penetration of energy sources for space heating in different regions Source: INE, 2001

10. 1. Spain (3)

11. 2. Denmark (1)

12. 2. Denmark (2) Sources of heating in multi family houses Source: www.danmarksstatistik.dk, 2004 Ownership of all dwellings Source: www.danmarksstatistik, 2004

13. 2. Denmark (3)

14. 3. Italy (1)

15. 3. Italy (2) Share of different types of fuels in space heating plants of Italian apartments Source: ENEA, 2004 Share of different types of fuels in DHW-preparation of Italian apartments Source: ISTAT, 2001

16. 3. Italy (3)

17. 4. Slovenia (1)

18. 4. Slovenia (2) Share of energy sources in final energy consumption for heating and hot water heating in households Source: Statistical Yearbook Republic of Slovenia; 2002 Type of heating systems for heating and hot water heating in households Source: Statistical Yearbook Republic of Slovenia; 2002

19. 4. Slovenia (3)

20. 5. Germany (1)

21. 5. Germany (2) Heating systems of German residential buildings Source: destatis 2005

22. 5. Germany (3)

23. 6. Netherlands (1)

24. 6. Netherlands (2) Energy sources for water heating Source: De Kwaliteit van de Nederlandse woning en woonomgeving rond de millenniumwisseling – Basisrapportage Kwalitatieve Woonregistratie 2000 (VROM) Hot water demand for hotel facilities Ssource: ISSO Publicatie 59 Grote zonneboilers – ontwerp, uitvoering en beheer, 2000

25. 6. Netherlands (3)

26. 7. Cyprus (1)

27. 7. Cyprus (2) Energy sources used in households in 2003 Source: Cyprus Solar Thermal Market 2003, Cyprus Institute of Energy Energy sources used in hotels in 2003 Source: Cyprus Institute of Energy, 2003

28. 7. Cyprus (3)

29. 7. France (1)

30. Heating systems in MFH > 19 Apartments Heating types in MFH referring to year of construction District heating No 90% 20,0% Central heating 80% 34,9% 70% 60% 50% Coal Gas central heating 40% /Wood heating 21,0% 30% 0,1% 20% Fuel central heating Electric Centraleheating 10% 22,7% 1,3% 0% Vor 1915 1915 - 1949 - 1968 - 1975 - 1982 - ab 1990 1948 1967 1974 1981 1989 Gas Fuel Electric and cabbage and wood No Central heating District heating 8. France (2) Fraction of heating systems in MFH Source: - Fraction of heating types in MFH, referring to year of construction Source: -

31. 8. France (3)

32. 3. Summary and overview – Comparison between countries

33. Summary – Assessment criteria Assessment criteria = assess the effects of the present market conditions and framework on the implementation of CSTS in each national housing and hotel sector +++ = optimal conditions for CSTS implementation ++ = advantageous conditions + = rather advantageous 0 = without influence - = rather disadvantageous -- = disadvantageous --- = implementation almost impossible

34. Summary – Comparison between SOLARGE countries (1) Legend: +++ = optimal conditions, ++ = advantageous, + = rather advantageous, 0 = without influence, - = rather disadvantageous, -- = very disadvantageous, --- = almost impossible

35. Summary – Comparison between SOLARGE countries (2) Legend: +++ = optimal framework, ++ = advantageous, + = rather advantageous, 0 = without influence, - = rather disadvantageous, -- = very disadvantageous, --- = almost impossible

36. 4. Conclusions for SOLARGE activities in 2006

37. 1. SOLARGE Spain

38. 2. SOLARGE Denmark

39. 3. SOLARGE Italy

40. 4. SOLARGEGermany

41. 5. SOLARGENetherlands

42. 6. SOLARGESlovenia

43. 7. SOLARGECyprus

44. 8. SOLARGE France