1 / 14

RoBOP-a-Mole

RoBOP-a-Mole. ME 4451: Robotics Patrick Chang Ryan Stewart Julia Barry Alex Choi. Objectives/Goals. Make a robot that could simulate the game, “Whack-a-Mole.” The robot must be autonomous. Must be able to hit more than one mole. Must not hit empty holes. Equipment and Materials Used.

baby
Download Presentation

RoBOP-a-Mole

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RoBOP-a-Mole ME 4451: Robotics Patrick Chang Ryan Stewart Julia Barry Alex Choi

  2. Objectives/Goals • Make a robot that could simulate the game, “Whack-a-Mole.” • The robot must be autonomous. • Must be able to hit more than one mole. • Must not hit empty holes.

  3. Equipment and Materials Used • ROBIX, RRR serial robot arm • DVT camera system • Computer with MATLAB and DVT program • Platform box • Moles (UGA Bulldogs) • Hammer • Black gloves

  4. Challenges • We need constant visual communication. • Avoid singular configurations. • Arm cannot interfere with camera. • No false positives. • Relate reference frames of camera and robot. • Four, instead of three D.O.F.

  5. Approach/Solution • Arm begins in an initial position away from camera. • Instead of locating centroid, used a binary system of checking moles. • Predefined joint angles and orientations to avoid singular configurations and meticulous reverse kinematics equations. • Decreased white detection threshold to avoid false positives.

  6. Kinematics • Forward Displacement Analysis for calibration. • Reverse Displacement Analysis for joint angles. • Precise Results required Trial and Error. • Simpler or robust methods were preferred.

  7. Results • Achieved all initial goals. • Robot can hit multiple moles. • See for yourself!

  8. DEMO TIME DEMO TIME

  9. What We Learned • Simple solutions are better. • Image processing. • Some of the equipment is…inconsistent.

  10. Things We Did Right • Meeting minutes • Defined our goals clearly • Met frequently

  11. Things We Could’ve Done • Timer • Time and Distance Optimized whacking • Score System

  12. Conclusion • It is possible to play “Whack-a-mole” with a robot arm. • UGA sucks.

  13. Thank You for Listening! Any Questions?

More Related