1 / 9

實施實證醫學五大步驟

實施實證醫學五大步驟. step 1. 整理出一個可以回答的問題 step 2. 尋找文獻證據 step 3. 嚴格評讀文獻 ( Critical appraisal ) step 4. 應用於病人身上 step 5. 對過程進行稽核. What is CAT?. Systematic evaluation of study/studies To critically appraise -- not only “ read ” , but also “ assess ”

babu
Download Presentation

實施實證醫學五大步驟

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 實施實證醫學五大步驟 step 1.整理出一個可以回答的問題 step 2. 尋找文獻證據 step 3. 嚴格評讀文獻 (Critical appraisal ) step 4. 應用於病人身上 step 5. 對過程進行稽核

  2. What is CAT? • Systematic evaluation of study/studies • To critically appraise -- not only “read”, but also “assess” • Simplify appraisal with VIP (or PICO/RAMbo)

  3. CRITICAL APPRAISAL SKILLSWhat is VIP? Validity (Reliability) 效度/信度 Can we believe it ? (研究方法的探討) Importance (Impact) 重要性 We believe it ! But does it matter? (研究結果的分析) Practice (Applicability) 臨床適用性 If we believe it - does it apply to our patients? (如何在臨床運用)

  4. Validity (Reliability)What is RAMbo? “Do we believe it? ” • Randomized:Was it randomised? Were the groups similar? • Accounted for all patients • Measurement: blinded or objective

  5. “該治療性研究結果是可信的嗎?” EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE How to Practice and Teach EBM • 病人的治療分派是否為隨機?隨機方式是否恰當?實驗開始前,實驗組及對照組是否相似、可比較?(R) • 病人追蹤是否夠久、夠完整?所有病人是否依其原先分派組別作分析?(A) • 病人及醫師是否對治療不知情(blind)?實驗組及對照組是否被同等對待?(M)

  6. Importance (Impact) “ We believe it !But-does it matter? ” • What were the results? -How large was the treatment effect? -How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?

  7. In therapy study • Number needed to treat (NNT) • Relative risk (RR) • Relative risk reduction (RRR) • Absolute risk reduction (ARR)

  8. 1. 實驗組的發病率(experimental event rate,EER):即在施與實驗組療法的病患,發生研究所關心之結果的比率。 • 2. 對照組的發病率(control event rate,CER):即在研究中未施與實驗組的療法,產生研究所關心之結果的比率。 • 3. 絕對危險降低度(absolute risk reduction,ARR)=CER-EER。 • 4. 使一位病人達到治療組治療之有益結果所需治療的病患數(number needed to treat,NNT)=1/ARR。 • 5. 絕對危險增加度(absolute risk increase,ARI)= EER-CER。 • 6. 增加一位受試者罹患某種醫源性傷害的治療病人數(number needed to harm,NNH)=1/ARI。 • 7. 信賴區間(confidence interval,CI):指在某一信賴程度內,由樣本統計量所求出預期可以包括母群體的範圍。

  9. 將12,562位有不穩定型心絞痛的患者分兩組進行隨機對照試驗,分別接受aspirin或合併使用clopidogrel ,九個月後研究結果:單獨使用aspirin(對照組)其心肌梗塞、中風或心臟血管疾病死亡率為11.47%;合併使用aspirin及clopidogrel (實驗組)其心肌梗塞、中風或心臟血管疾病死亡率為9.28%。對照組發生非致死性出血副作用為2.7% ;實驗組為3.6% 。 CER=11.47%; EER=9.28% RR=9.28%/11.47%=0.81 RRR=(11.47%-9.28%)/11.47%=19% ARR=11.47%-9.28%=2.19% NNT=1/2.19%=46 ARI(絕對危險性增加率)=3.6%-2.7%=0.9% NNH=1/0.9%=111

More Related