1 / 22

Healthy coping with operational stress: Insights for leaders Paul T. Bartone Center for Technology and National Securi

1. National Security involves broad range of missions, complex operations, stability

azana
Download Presentation

Healthy coping with operational stress: Insights for leaders Paul T. Bartone Center for Technology and National Securi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    3. This work led to a series of studies, and a somewhat crystallized definition of hardiness as the“three C’s: “Hardy persons possess 3 general characteristics” Commitment (vs. alienation) - the ability to feel deeply involved in activities of life Control (vs. powerlessness) - belief you can control or influence events of your experience Challenge (vs. threat) - anticipation of change as an exciting challenge to further development This work led to a series of studies, and a somewhat crystallized definition of hardiness as the“three C’s: “Hardy persons possess 3 general characteristics” Commitment (vs. alienation) - the ability to feel deeply involved in activities of life Control (vs. powerlessness) - belief you can control or influence events of your experience Challenge (vs. threat) - anticipation of change as an exciting challenge to further development

    6. A model of psychosocial stressors in recent military operations: 1. Isolation - remote location; family separation; poor communication; culturally isolated; socially isolated in one’s own unit (no cohesion) 2. Ambiguity - unclear mission & chain of command; role ambiguity, uncertainty; indeterminate tour length 3. Powerlessness - can’t get things fixed, no repair parts; prevented from positive action by politics, security concerns, red-tape 4. Boredom - Lack of meaningful work and activities 5. Danger – threat of injury or death from mines, snipers, terrorists, accidents, disease, environmental hazards & toxins 6. High OPTEMPO – smaller force, more and longer deployments A model of psychosocial stressors in recent military operations: 1. Isolation - remote location; family separation; poor communication; culturally isolated; socially isolated in one’s own unit (no cohesion) 2. Ambiguity - unclear mission & chain of command; role ambiguity, uncertainty; indeterminate tour length 3. Powerlessness - can’t get things fixed, no repair parts; prevented from positive action by politics, security concerns, red-tape 4. Boredom - Lack of meaningful work and activities 5. Danger – threat of injury or death from mines, snipers, terrorists, accidents, disease, environmental hazards & toxins 6. High OPTEMPO – smaller force, more and longer deployments

    7. This work led to a series of studies, and a somewhat crystallized definition of hardiness as the“three C’s: “Hardy persons possess 3 general characteristics” Commitment (vs. alienation) - the ability to feel deeply involved in activities of life Control (vs. powerlessness) - belief you can control or influence events of your experience Challenge (vs. threat) - anticipation of change as an exciting challenge to further development This work led to a series of studies, and a somewhat crystallized definition of hardiness as the“three C’s: “Hardy persons possess 3 general characteristics” Commitment (vs. alienation) - the ability to feel deeply involved in activities of life Control (vs. powerlessness) - belief you can control or influence events of your experience Challenge (vs. threat) - anticipation of change as an exciting challenge to further development

    8. Here’s some data from the Gulf War, showing the typical interaction effect between stress and hardiness N=824 soldiers, stress=combat exposure, outcome indicator is PTSD symptoms This is after controlling for pre-combat anxiety levels or neuroticism, and also separate from cohesion effects This interaction effect is a very robust one, I’ve found it in many more samples, including West Point cadets,US soldiers deployed to Croatia, Kuwait, Saudi and Bosnia.Here’s some data from the Gulf War, showing the typical interaction effect between stress and hardiness N=824 soldiers, stress=combat exposure, outcome indicator is PTSD symptoms This is after controlling for pre-combat anxiety levels or neuroticism, and also separate from cohesion effects This interaction effect is a very robust one, I’ve found it in many more samples, including West Point cadets,US soldiers deployed to Croatia, Kuwait, Saudi and Bosnia.

    9. In organizations, leaders may be in a unique position to shape how stressful experiences are understood by members of the group. The leader who, through example and discussion, communicates a positive construction or re-construction of shared stressful experiences, may exert an influence on the entire group in the direction of his/her interpretation of experience – toward hardy interpretations.. This effect may be intensified under high-stress conditions such as deployments, where in part due to isolation, boredom and other deployment situational factors, the influence of leaders may be intensified. In organizations, leaders may be in a unique position to shape how stressful experiences are understood by members of the group. The leader who, through example and discussion, communicates a positive construction or re-construction of shared stressful experiences, may exert an influence on the entire group in the direction of his/her interpretation of experience – toward hardy interpretations.. This effect may be intensified under high-stress conditions such as deployments, where in part due to isolation, boredom and other deployment situational factors, the influence of leaders may be intensified.

More Related