Capital Improvement Program and Condition Assessment Program A Briefing for MARTA Management

1. Monday, February 5, 2001 Capital Improvement Program andCondition Assessment Program A Briefing for MARTA Management Presented by: Richard Boullain, MARTA Troy Cowan, PB Facilities

2. Capital Improvement Program Overview Capital Improvement Program is a tool for: Planning Long Term (20 years) Capital Programs Existing Assets Added, New Assets Prioritizing Resources Mission Critical, Mission Support, Mission Enhancement Determining Impacts From Changes MARTA Priorities & Policies, Gov./GRTA/GASB policies, Funding and Grant Programs, Significant External Events, Disasters/Emergencies

3. Capital Improvement Program Model

4. *PB Inspectors assess the visual condition of the asset and do not include testing or measuring of equipment and systems Condition Assessment Study

5. Condition Assessment Study

6. Condition Assessment Study

7. Condition Assessment Study

8. Condition Assessment Study Methods for Assessing Condition Inspections for Selected Assets Stations, Bldgs, Maintenance Facilities, Garages, Shops, HVAC, Electrical Sampled: TPSS, GBSS Verified MARTA Inventory List: Electrical, HVAC Data From Existing Studies Facilities Assessment Study (FAS), Sizemore Floyd Architects, (1996) FAS Update (September 2000) Financial Capacity Study, KPMG Consulting, LLC (1998)

9. Field Assessment Photos

10. Field Assessment Photos

11. Field Assessment Photos

12. Condition Assessment Study Buildings Mechanical Traction Power Vehicle Servicing Equipment Track Structures Fare Collection ATC Other Structures Signage Why we didn’t assess everything Duplication Efficiency or Assessment doesn’t add much to rehab/replace decisionWhy we didn’t assess everything Duplication Efficiency or Assessment doesn’t add much to rehab/replace decision

13. Condition Assessment Study Condition Assessment Study (CAS) Report includes: CAS Database With current condition snapshot Proposed Rehab/Replacement Cycle and Cost Suggested Maintenance Actions Requiring Immediate Attention Recommendations

14. Condition Assessment Study Completed Actions to Date Completed Stakeholder Meetings Acquired Asset Inventory Files Pilot Inspection Checklists Pilot Inspections Final Inspection Checklists

15. Condition Assessment Study Completed Actions to Date (cont.) Review of Pilot Inspection Results Inspections Checklist Update Data Collection Proposed Replacement Model Review Performed Inspections Report of Preliminary Results Final Report Delivery

16. Condition Assessment Study Analysis Based on Review of 3,522 MARTA ‘s Assets & Sub-levels (system, component, type) 1,105 Assessed by Condition (535 by PB, 570 by MARTA) 2,417 Assessed by Age Summary of Infrastructure Included

17. Condition Assessment Study Analysis Resulted in 40 Year Projections of 13,117 Rehab and Replacements Actions Each individually priced & scheduled $5.5 Billion 40-Year Total Cost Shown in Current Year Dollars $138.6 Million Average Annual Cost Shown in Current Year Dollars $370.9 Million in Current Backlog Annual Average Does Not Include Backlog Work-Off Plan

18. Condition Assessment Study Findings To Date Excellent Support from MARTA Personnel Issues in Obtaining Asset Inventory Data Existing Inventory Multiple data sources, with no common cross-reference Cumbersome data reporting, complicating access to data Significant amounts of incomplete, outdated data found in key parameters Asset Breakdown Structure Developed categories for assets in inventory

19. Condition Assessment Study *Projections use the mid-range of unit costs.*Projections use the mid-range of unit costs.

20. Condition Assessment Study *Look-ahead, 10-year average: for each $ value, add the cost projection for the next 10 years and divide by 10. High End: Calculated using the higher end unit costs. Mid Range: Calculated using the mid-range unit costs (these were used in the CA Projections Chart) Low End: Calculated using the lower end unit cost. 20 year average - Mid-Range: Total of cost projections from 2001 - 2020 divided by 20. 40 year average - Mid-Range: Total of cost projections from 2001 - 2040 divided by 40.*Look-ahead, 10-year average: for each $ value, add the cost projection for the next 10 years and divide by 10. High End: Calculated using the higher end unit costs. Mid Range: Calculated using the mid-range unit costs (these were used in the CA Projections Chart) Low End: Calculated using the lower end unit cost. 20 year average - Mid-Range: Total of cost projections from 2001 - 2020 divided by 20. 40 year average - Mid-Range: Total of cost projections from 2001 - 2040 divided by 40.

21. Condition Assessment Study Follow-on Needs Define Priorities for Ranking Rehabilitation and Replacement Requirements Improved Asset Information Systems Methods to Acquire and Maintain Asset Data Inventory, Condition, Capability and Capacity Updated Asset and Business Management Practices