economic subject matter meetings n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Economic Subject Matter Meetings PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Economic Subject Matter Meetings

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

Economic Subject Matter Meetings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 92 Views
  • Uploaded on

Economic Subject Matter Meetings. October 2002. Five-State Beef Initiative in Kentucky. Five State Beef Initiative - Update. Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Kentucky Through September, ’04 E. Cornbelt beef supply chain initiative Req. include: source verification, certification.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Economic Subject Matter Meetings' - axel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
economic subject matter meetings
Economic Subject Matter Meetings

October 2002

Five-State Beef Initiative in Kentucky

five state beef initiative update
Five State Beef Initiative - Update
  • Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Kentucky
  • Through September, ’04
  • E. Cornbelt beef supply chain initiative
  • Req. include: source verification, certification
produce benefits of the fsbi
Produce Benefits of the FSBI
  • Receive 50% Cost Sharing on EID’s and carcass data collection through 2003
  • Receive detailed performance and carcass data that can be benchmarked with other producers
  • Learn where your cattle fit in the marketplace
  • Be part of a progressive, multi-state, source verified beef cattle alliance
requirements of the fsbi
Requirements of the FSBI
  • Source verify - Use electronic ID tags (EID’S)
  • Health - manage calves by CPH-45 guidelines
  • Market calves trackable lots

(ie: load lots, CHP sales, etc.)

  • Basic cow/calf production records (SPA/CHAPS)
  • FSBI producer certification training
  • Genetics, environmental and humane standards
update on participation
Update on Participation

2001

-2300 calves from 142 different producers

-Carcass data returned on over 1700

2002

-5400 calves from 195 different producers

-Carcass data is still being returned

what have we learned thus far
What have we learned thus far?
  • Kentucky feeders calves perform better than expected in the feedlot and on the rail
  • Uniformity still needs to be improved
  • Carcass data is not only useful to individual producers, it can be a marketing tool for county / multi-county groups
  • Cooperation can exist within the current beef marketing system
slide7

This presentation was presented with the Agricultural Situation and Outlook, Fall 2002, publication

number ESM-28, published by the Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Kentucky

with an additional contribution from Kentucky State University in October 2002. The entire publication

can be accessed on the WWW at http://www.uky.edu/Ag/AgEcon/publications/esm_28.pdf.

This article presents information on the economic situation and outlook for Kentucky agriculture and

is intended to assist farmers, agribusiness professionals, Extension filed staff, and others with interest

in agriculture and agribusiness. Information presented here is based on the most recent information and

research available. However, the rapidly changing economic and policy conditions for agriculture limit

the usefulness and life span of conclusions and recommendations cited here. Decision makers should

keep these facts in mind. Feel free to use the information included in this publication for other uses,

but please provide professional citation about the source. This paper is published without formal review

and the views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University

of Kentucky, the Agricultural Experiment Station, or the Cooperative Extension Service.

If you need additional information or if you would like to provide comments or suggestions about this

slideshow, please contact Kenny Burdine at kburdine@uky.edu.

University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics

400 Charles E. Barnhart Bldg., Lexington, KY 40546-0276

 Phone: 859-257-5762, Fax: 859-323-1913

URL: http://www.uky.edu/Ag/AgEcon/