1 / 11

West Africa High Level Peer Exchange Accra Nov 28- Dec 1, 2006

West Africa High Level Peer Exchange Accra Nov 28- Dec 1, 2006. Development Paths for Affordable Housing Finance Systems Olivier Hassler The World Bank ohassler@worldbank.org Financial and Private Sector Development.

avel
Download Presentation

West Africa High Level Peer Exchange Accra Nov 28- Dec 1, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. West Africa High Level Peer ExchangeAccra Nov 28- Dec 1, 2006 Development Paths for Affordable Housing Finance Systems Olivier Hassler The World Bank ohassler@worldbank.org Financial and Private Sector Development

  2. Outline of the Presentation • Strengthening the market infrastructure is often blocked by conflicting objectives • What should lead what: primary or secondary market? • The liquidity trap • Expanding Housing Finance Outreach: Top-down or bottom-up? • Development engines/ Role of the government • 2 cases of market/government interaction based growth

  3. Mortgage Lending Foundations: Conflicts of objectives often hinder its strengthening • Clear titles, reliable records, efficient collaterals: a condition for widening access to finance • ..often preempted by other objectives : • Anti-speculative goals can make property rights precarious ( deterrent for secured finance and large scale developments) Better practices: Senegal, Niger, South African countries (land proclamation) • High registration costs affect the formalization of rights and market dynamics ( counterproductive) Ex.: Pakistan: growth of revenues after lowering transaction costs (Sindh: 10% to 5%, Punjab 3.5% to .5%) • Ill focused defaulters protection encourages willful behaviors • Need of limiting motivations and timeframe of foreclosure contestations (Chile) • Earnest deposit requirements from contesters (Pakistan)

  4. What leads what: primary or capital market? • Capital market funding is not a pre- condition of development … • …Except for: • Specialized, non- deposit taking institutions • Fixed rate lending • seeking to anchor lending on C.M. too early can be counterproductive (if small institutional savings, no liquidity…) • Banks deposits are an acceptable source of funds provided that • The bancarisation rate is growing • There are stable core deposit bases (factors: confidence- currency, banks-, dispersion of depositors, private sector deposits) • Loans carry adjustable rates See European markets: +/- 3/4 of mortgage loans stock [even USA: deposits fund nearly half of mortgages directly or indirectly]

  5. What leads what: primary or capital market? Cnt • A well sequenced interaction between bank funding and C.M. can promote market development • Emergence of deposit based lending • Critical mass, portfolios valuation bases  secured funding through the C.M. can start • Quality lending and servicing standards required by C.M  primary market more efficient • Market liquidity allows banks to invest in mortgage securities , redistribution of resources from cash rich to constrained lenders • However, deadlocked situations are possible: vulnerable deposit bases + weak mortgage infrastructure -Ex: CEMAC • Choosing appropriate funding instruments is critical to spur integration • Transitional tools • Simplicity vs complexity

  6. The liquidity trap • If a weak mortgage infrastructure restricts lending to a small high-end segment • If the bridge with the capital market is not functional • No long term yield curve • No proper investment vehicles • Insufficient market liquidity  • The financial system does not fulfill its intermediation function – independently of lacking investment opportunities : • Liquidity trap • Misallocation of long term resources(reverse term transformation)

  7. Expanding the outreach: top down or bottom up? • The dualistic nature of African Economies cannot be ignored • Mainstream banks are often limited by strategic considerations • Alternative lenders exist Mali (Nyesigiso), Congo (Mucodec), Burkina Faso (Caisses Populaires), SACCOs • But they are often weak • Connecting alt. lenders to the formal financial sector is needed: • Removal of the funding constraints • Access to money market and last resort lender required for liquidity management • Credit information exchange • There are conditions for such a connection: • Soundness (apex, supervision, rating) • Governance • Technical arrangements ( whole sale lending, guarantees, brockerage agreements) • The 2 approaches are complementary Inducing banks to go “down market” needs to be encouraged (Ex.:South Africa Financial Charter), & alternative lenders to be strengthened

  8. Development Engines and Government Role • “Organic” growth is rare (Indian commercial banks since 1999?) • Hence governments tendency to directly remedy “market failures” • Direct provision of housing A now widely recognized misallocation of resources. • State housing Banks more than often, disappointing social and economic outcomes • Housing Provident Funds often little impact, and negative side effects(regressive subsidization, distortions hampering the development of the global supply)

  9. Development Engines and Government role • Government “Engineered growth” of the private sector: a development path with proven successes • Promotion of a conducive environment • Pakistan since 2001 (macro economics, liberalization, recovery law) • Support to specialized institutions • India: HDFC, and following HFCs (initial support, bank credit direction, NHB backing) • Mexico: SOFOLES driven market driven resumption after the Tequila crisis(multifacetted SHF support) • Ghana: HFC (Bank of G. initial stake, GoG & SNITT bond holders) • Liquidity Facility with catalytic impact • Malaysia: Cagamas (Central Bank 20% stake) • Jordan: JMRC • Transfer of risks exceeding a commercial threshold • USA, Europe: mortgage insurance on loans to moderate income groups • Mexico SHF: indexation gap risk

  10. Case study: India (mortgage loans: from 2% to 4% GDP 2002-2005) • 1978: HDFC- a private sector lender & market developer • 1983: new HFCs, some with HDFC support • Beneficiaries of bank credit direction • Various regulatory and tax advantages • 1988: National Housing Bank • Public sector market developer • HFC regulator • Refinancier • 1991: securitization framework and first ABS issue • 1999: Commercial Banks entry • Liquidity & interest rates • Prudential norms • End 90s/early 00s: market environment measures: • Borrowers’ tax incentives • Repeal of Urban Land Ceiling Act in some states • Reduction of transfer costs • Out of court foreclosure (2002) • New securitization framework (2002)

  11. Case study: Chile(mortgage loans: 18% GDP) • Mid 70s: Savings & Loans collapse • 1978: To induce bank lending, remedy instability and confidence crisis: • revitalization of mortgage bonds(on balance sheet debt, collateralized, pass-through structure) • Indexation(well accepted index since 1967) • 1978-80: Central Bank support to the new instrument • 1980: creation of fully funded pension funds Mortgage Bonds become their major assets. Loans up to 20 years • In parallel: • direct demand subsidy program, with prior savings requirement, open to all banks • Government guarantee on low income mortgages • 1988-90: Transitional, pre- securitization tools (Endorsable loans, non-bank originators) • 1995: Securitization framework • 2002: new subsidy policy, including a subsidy ($100 to 400) to the originators of small loans

More Related