Scientific Ethics and Ethical Decision Making

1. Scientific Ethics and Ethical Decision Making Leonard Ortmann Renee Ross Natalie Brown Betty Wong Office of the Director Office of the Associate Director for Science

2. Who You Gonna Call? • An investigator has worked with his Center ADS and Human Subject Contact to determine that the activity he proposes is classified as non-exempt research involving human subjects. Which office facilitates the work of the IRB? • You are attending a conference hosted by a pharmaceutical company and are asked to go to lunch with the organizer. They have agreed to pay. Which office can give you advice on whether you can accept the lunch? • Your program is developing recommendations relating to a public health policy and you want to ensure that you have considered all of the ethical ramifications. Which office would you turn to for assistance? 2

3. Ethics Is About … • Avoiding wrong doing, doing the right thing, doing what is best, doing what we should do • Establishing ethical principles of action • Reflectively analyzing and evaluating the rightness or wrongness of actions • Practically making decisions often in the context of conflicting values or competing stakeholders • Prioritizing and integrating diverse values in crafting decisions, policies or recommendations 3

4. Stop Sign Versus Green Light Ethics

5. 5

6. Public Health Ethics:Addressing ethical issues in the practice of public health Leonard Ortmann, Ph.D. Public Health Ethicist Public Health Ethics Unit Office of Science Integrity Office of the Associate Director for Science

7. Common Ethical Challengesin Public Health Practice • Allocating scarce resources fairly: in regard to undocumented aliens, in emergencies, etc. • Respecting individual rights and freedom while protecting the public good • Protecting underserved and marginalized populations and building trust with them • Engaging and sharing information with communities in a transparent manner • Protecting data confidentiality and individual privacy while conducting surveillance activities

8. Sets a standard of accountability to ethically orient public health institutions and practitioners Lays out 12 key principles for analyzing ethical challenges and practicing public health Key concept: interdependence of community membershttp://www.apha.org/NR/rdonlyres/1CED3CEA-287E-4185-9CBD-BD405FC60856/0/ethicsbrochure.pdf Code of Ethics for Public Health

9. Clinical vs. Public Health Ethics Clinical Emphasis Public Health Emphasis • Focus on patient-provider interactions • Biomedical determinants • Respect for autonomy, privacy, liberty • Informed consent • Beneficence and non-maleficence • Justice • Focus on institutions and populations • Social determinants • Interdependence and interrelatedness • Public engagement • Social good and avoiding social harm • Social justice

10. Development of ethics guidance on specific program areas Development of capacity of CDC staff to address ethical issues Training Center level public health ethics teams Consultation procedures Support of state and local health departments Focus of Activities

11. CDC Ethics Consult Procedure • The process of a public health ethics consult can be categorized into three actions - to identify, analyze, and resolve. • 9-step framework provides a systematic step-wise approach to ethical decision making http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/phethics/startConsultation.htm

12. Example of Public Health Ethics Question • Your program is developing recommendations relating to a public health policy and you want to ensure that you have considered all of the ethical ramifications. Which office would you turn to for assistance?

13. Employee Ethics Renee Ross Ethics Program Specialist Ethics Program Activity Office Office of the Chief Operating Officer

14. Responsibilities • Public Financial Disclosure • Outside Activity Requests • Official Duty Requests • Award Approvals • Advice and Counseling • Seeking Employment and Post Employment Restrictions • Letters of Support • Hatch Act

15. 14 General Principles of Ethical Conduct • Public Service is a Public Trust • Requires employees to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principals above private gain • Employees have a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens, and shall respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct

16. You should never use your public office for your private gain. Employees are not to use their position, title or any authority associated with their office to coerce or induce a benefit for themselves or others. Employees also are not to use or allow the improper use of nonpublic information to further a private interest, either their own or another's. Misuse of Position

17. Annual Requirement used to determine if an employee has a potential conflict of interest with their investments and activities as those issues relate to their official duties Criminal Conflict of Interest Statute 18 U.S.C. § 208 This means that employees must not participate in any official matter that would have a direct and predictable effect on their own or imputed financial interests. Annual Ethics Training – due December 30, 2011 Confidential Financial Disclosure ReportsOGE 450

18. Employees must obtain approval before engaging in an outside activity which requires the use of professional qualifications readily identified with CDC employment. Employees shall not engage in any outside activity that conflicts with his/her official duties. Employees are prohibited from participating in activities that create an appearance of using public office for private gain, or create the appearance that the employee’s official position was used to obtain an outside business opportunity. Employees may receive compensation Outside Activity Requests

19. What are official duty activities? Federal Liaison; Advisory Board/Committee or Editorial Board; Voluntary Consensus Standard Organization (standards setting body); and Officer, Director, or Trustee Approval is granted: If the activity is related to employee’s official duties If the activity is consistent with the authority and mission of the agency The employee may not receive compensation Official Duty Requests

20. Awards from Outside Sources Awards may be accepted for meritorious public service or achievement, including work performed at CDC/ATSDR. Awards that have a market value of more than $200 requires prior written determination by the Deputy Ethics Counselor. Awards may not be accepted from entities that have interests that may be substantially affected by the performance or non-performance of the employees official duties. 20

21. Letter of SupportPermanent Residency • Can I use CDC Letterhead using my official title? • Must have personal knowledge of the ability or character of the individual, and • Must be a person you have dealt with in the course of your Federal employment, OR • This person is seeking a Federal job. • 18 USC 205 (Appearing on behalf of another before a Federal Agency) • Employee must write the letter based on his own knowledge • Letter must not be written by applicant or by the applicant’s direction

22. Letter of SupportGrant Application • Letter should be: • General in nature • Outline importance of the work or subject matter, not the application • Straightforward and factual • 5 CFR 2635.101(b)(8) – Impartiality • 5 CFR 2635.702(c) - Endorsement

23. Conflict of InterestStatutes • 5 CFR 2635.702(c) – Endorsement • Provides that an “employee shall not use or permit the use of his Government position or title or any authority associated with his public office to endorse any product, service, or enterprise.” • 5 CFR 2635.101 (b)(8) – Impartiality • Provides that an employee “shall act impartially and not give preferential treatment to any private organization or individual.”

24. Gifts • Question: • I am attending a conference hosted by a pharmaceutical company and I’m asked to go to lunch with the organizer. They have agreed to pay – can I accept the lunch? • Answer - Yes: • As long as the gift was not given because of your official position • As long as the value of the lunch does not exceed $20 • 2635.204(a) – An exception to gift rule: • allows that federal employees may accept unsolicited gifts with an aggregate value of $20 or less per source per occasion, not to exceed $50 from that same source in a calendar year.

25. Hatch ActPermitted Activities • Employees may: • Register and vote • Contribute money to political candidates or organizations • Assist in nonpartisan voter registration drives • Participate in nonpartisan campaigns (such as most school board elections) • Campaign for or against referendum questions, constitutional amendments, etc. • Employees may not: • Run for public office in a partisan election • Use official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election • Use official title in connection with any partisan political activity • Solicit or discourage the political activity of anyone having business before the Department • Engage in political fundraising

26. Hatch ActPresidential Photographs • Can I display a picture of a candidate for partisan political office in my workspace? • No, as a general rule, employees may not display pictures of candidates for partisan public office in the federal workplace. • Exception to the rule - All of the following must apply: • Photo was on display in advance of election season • The employee is in the photograph with the candidate • The photograph is a personal one (i.e., the employee has personal relationship with the candidate and photo is taken at personal event)

27. Advice and Guidance • The Ethics Program Activity Office offers individual counseling on: • Conflicts of Interest • Political Activities • Post Employment Restrictions • Recusals

28. Human Research Ethics Natalie Brown, MPH, Senior IRB Administrator and Betty Wong, MPH, CHES, IRB Administrator Human Research Protection Office Office of Science Integrity Office of the Associate Director for Science

29. Overview • Regulatory overview • Public health research or public health practice • Research involving human subjects • CDC’s institutional review board (IRB) process 29

30. CDC Policy Considerations • CDC has ethical and legal obligation to ensure individuals are protected in all public health activities • All CDC activities must be reviewed to determine if they are research involving human subjects • CDC and collaborators must comply with 45 CFR part 46 and 21 CFR parts 50 and 56 to assure the protection of human subjects • Prevention and control of disease or injury to improve public health programs, clearly without a research component, is deemed nonresearch • Incorporating a research component is a possibility during emergency situations, but the appropriate approvals must be obtained prior to the commencement of the research http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf 30

31. Distinguishing Public Health Research and Public Health Practice: A CDC Perspective http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf 31

32. References, Policies, and Guidance • Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR 46 • 45 CFR 46.102(d) • http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html • CDC’s policy on Distinguishing Public Health Research and Public Health Nonresearch, July 2010 • http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf • CSTE’s Public Health Practice vs. Research: A Report for Public Health Practitioners, May 2004 • http://www.cste.org/pdffiles/newpdffiles/CSTEPHResRptHodgeFinal.5.24.04.pdf 32

33. The Belmont Report • 1979 report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/hrpo/codes/belm-eng.pdf) • Guide the resolution of the ethical problems based on 3 principles • Respect for persons • Beneficence • Justice 33

34. Additional Determinations for Research • Once an activity is classified as research, three additional determinations must be made: • Is the activity research involving human subjects? • If the activity is nonexempt research involving human subjects, which institutions are engaged in research and are required to certify IRB approval? • If the activity is research involving human subjects, does the research meet the criteria for exemption from 45 CFR 46? 34

35. What is Research Involving Human Subjects? • Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR 46 • 45 CFR 46.102(f) – Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains • Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or • Identifiable private information • Excludes research that uses existing anonymous data and data about deceased individuals • Once the project is determined to be research involving human subjects, 45 CFR 46 applies • Except that there are a few exemptions for certain activities that generally carry negligible risk • There are special considerations for vulnerable persons 35

36. Engagement of Institutions inHuman Subjects Research • Institutions are considered engaged in human subjects research when its employees or agents for the purposes of the research project obtain • Data about the subjects of the research through intervention or interaction with them • Identifiable private information about the subjects of the research • The informed consent for research 36

37. Determination for Review • All projects undergo a formal review by the Associate Director for Science in each CIO • Projects that are determined to be research involving human subjects where CDC is engaged are routed to HRPO • Nonexempt human subjects research is reviewed by an IRB • Exempt human subjects research is reviewed by the Chief of HRPO or designee 37

38. CDC Options for IRB Review • CDC IRB: Convened Board (Quorum) • Expedited review not permitted • May meet the criteria for expedited review, but the research project is controversial or includes sensitive topics or issues • CDC IRB: Expedited Review (45 CFR 46.110) • Permissible categories • Experienced reviewer outside convened meeting • Non-CDC IRB: Reliance Request • Reliance on an outside IRB • Limited criteria primarily based on CDC’s role 38

39. CDC IRB Review • HRPO provides worksheets and guidance to all IRB members to ensure that all regulatory requirements are met; standard operating procedures are also available • HRPO utilizes the primary IRB reviewer system • An expert reviewer reviews protocol, consent form, and all supporting documentation • A less experienced reviewer will review with concurrence from an expert reviewer • IRB reports are issued to the principal investigator upon completion of the review • Once all regulatory requirements are met, the study is approved for no more than one year 39

40. Example of Human Research Protection Question • An investigator has worked with his Center ADS and Human Subject Contact to determine that the activity he proposes is classified as non-exempt research involving human subjects. Which office facilitates the work of the IRB? 40

42. Drue Barrett, Lead Email: DBarrett@cdc.gov or phethics@cdc.gov Telephone: 404-639-4690 FAX: 404-639-7341 Website: http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/phethics/ Public Health Ethics Unit

43. Teresa Walker-Mason, Ethics Program Officer Email: Ethics@cdc.gov Telephone: 770-488-8970 Fax: 770-488-0265 Website: http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/ethics/ Ethics Program Activity Office

44. Barbara R. DeCausey, Chief Email: huma@cdc.gov Telephone: 404-639-7570 Fax: 404-639-3249 Website: http://intranet.cdc.gov/od/oads/osi/hrpo/ Human Research Protection Office