1 / 25

Harald Rittger, MD University of Erlangen; Klinikum Coburg Germany

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis PEPCAD-DES Study. Harald Rittger, MD University of Erlangen; Klinikum Coburg Germany TCT 2011 – First Report Investigation. KLINIKUM CO B U R G.

auryon
Download Presentation

Harald Rittger, MD University of Erlangen; Klinikum Coburg Germany

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stent RestenosisPEPCAD-DES Study Harald Rittger, MD University of Erlangen; Klinikum Coburg Germany TCT 2011 – First Report Investigation KLINIKUM CO B U R G

  2. Disclosures Supported in part by an unrestricted grant by B.Braun, Melsungen, Germany Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company • Grant/Research Support • Consulting Fees/Honoraria • Major Stock Shareholder/Equity • Royalty Income • Ownership/Founder • Intellectual Property Rights • Other Financial Benefit • B.Braun, Siemens • B.Braun, Siemens • none • none • None • None • none

  3. Centers Harald Rittger, MD Klinikum Coburg Marc-A. Ohlow, MD Zentralklinik Bad Berka Andreas Brugger, MD Klinikum Kulmbach Holger Thiele, MD Herzzentrum Leipzig Ralf Birkemeyer, MD Klinikum Villingen-S. Volker Kurowski, MD Universität Lübeck

  4. Background Drug-eluting stents (DES) significantly reduced the occurrence of restenosis and the subsequent need for repeat revascularization. Nevertheless, the incidence of DES-restenosis (DES-ISR) remains frequent due to the continuous increase in DES implantations.

  5. Background Complex lesions with a high restenotic potential are sufficiently treated with present DES, limiting the use of bare-metal stents (BMS) to patients not eligible for dual antiplatelet therapy. Paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty (SeQuent Please, B.Braun) has been shown to be superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and non-inferior to paclitaxel eluting stent (PES) implantation for treatment of BMS restenosis.

  6. Background Whether the use of paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty is also effective in DES restenosis has not been sufficiently studied so far. We evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, single blinded trial the efficacy of paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty (SeQuent Please, B.Braun, Germany) compared with plain old balloon angioplasty for DES restenosis in native coronary arteries.

  7. Inclusion Criteria Age > 18 years Lesion in native coronary artery DES restenosis of Sirolimus eluting stents: Cypher, Yukon Everolimus eluting stents: Xience, Promus Paclitaxel eluting stents: Taxus Indication for PCI (symptoms, ischemia) Reference diameter 2.5 – 3.5 mm Lesion length ≤ 22 mm

  8. Exclusion Criteria thrombus within the target vessel side branch ≥ 2 mm in diameter originating within the restenosis or bifurcation lesion multiple lesions in the target vessel lesions in bypass grafts total coronary artery occlusion lesions within 1 mm of vessel origin or left main planned surgery within 6 months after the index procedure women with childbearing potential contraindication or known hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, paclitaxel or heparin.

  9. Primary Endpoint Primary endpoint: six-months late lumen loss at the target lesion. Superiority testing of the primary end point on an intention-to-treat basis.

  10. Primary Endpoint With an assumed late lumen loss of 0.20±0.30mm in the drug coated balloon group and 0.80±0.80mm in the POBA group the necessary number of patients were 64 in the drug coated balloon and 34 in the POBA group to achieve 90% power With an assumed dropout rate of 10% the patient numbers to be recruited were 71 in the drug coated balloon and 38 in the POBA group.

  11. Secondary Endpoints Secondary angiographic endpoints Binary restenosis, minimal lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis (target lesion and total segment) Secondary clinical endpoints (definition according to ARC criteria) Target lesion revascularization Myocardial infarction Death MACE as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributable to target vessel, target lesion revascularization

  12. 110 patients enrolled and randomized (2:1) predilation Ballon angioplasty alone N=38 Paclitaxel coated balloon N=72 6 months ASS+Clopidogrel 6 months angiographic follow-up 88.9% (N=64/72) 6 months angiographic follow-up 81.6 % (N=31/38) 6-month clinical follow-up 100 % (N=72/72) 6-month clinical follow-up 100 % (N=38/38)

  13. Baseline Characteristics * p=0.02

  14. Baseline Angiography + p=0.005

  15. Procedural Data

  16. Procedural Data * p=0.041

  17. Post Procedure QCA

  18. Primary Endpoint - Late Loss POBA 1.03 ± 0.77

  19. Primary Endpoint - Late Loss P < 0.001 0.43 ± 0.61 POBA 1.03 ± 0.77 DCB

  20. Late Loss at 6 Months P = <0.001 P = 0.18 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 POBA DCB

  21. Follow-up QCA

  22. Binary Angiographic Restenosis at 6 Months Binary Restenosis (%) POBA P < 0.001 P < 0.001 DCB

  23. Clinical Outcomes at 6 Months *TLR, myocardial infarction attributable to target vessel, cardiac death

  24. Conclusion • In this prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter study the treatment strategy with paclitaxel coated balloon (SeQuent Please, B.Braun) compared with balloon angioplasty alone for treatment of DES restenosis showed: • a significantly lower late loss (primary endpoint) • a significantly lower binary restenosis rate, percent diameter stenosis and a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter at follow-up • significantly less MACE • no definite vessel thrombosis

  25. A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Restenosis of Drug-Eluting StentsPEPCAD-DES Study Harald Rittger, MD University of Erlangen; Klinikum Coburg Germany TCT 2011 – First Report Investigation KLINIKUM CO B U R G Thank you very much for your attention!

More Related