1 / 29

Toxicogenomics

Toxicogenomics. Heather Handley JP Student. Toxicogenomics. “… field of study that combines clinical, genomic, and proteomic data into a unified framework for understanding the biochemical and genetic basis for various diseases.” (Ballatori et al. , 2003)

augusta
Download Presentation

Toxicogenomics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Toxicogenomics Heather Handley JP Student

  2. Toxicogenomics “… field of study that combines clinical, genomic, and proteomic data into a unified framework for understanding the biochemical and genetic basis for various diseases.” (Ballatori et al., 2003) “… a new scientific field that elucidates how the entire genome is involved in biological responses of organisms exposed to environmental toxicants/stressors. It combines information from studies of genomic-scale mRNA profiling, cell-wide or tissue-wide protein profiling (proteomics), genetic susceptibility, and computational models to understand the roles of gene-environment interactions in disease.” (Selkirk and Tennant, 2002)

  3. Functional Genomics Comparative Genomics TOXICOGENOMICS & PHARMACOGENOMICS Transcriptomics (Gene Expression) Population Genomics Toxicogenomics

  4. Agenda MICROARRAY OVERVIEW TOXICOGENOMICS EXAMPLES Sequence Analysis 1. Pharmacogenomics and individualized medicine 2. Comparative and functional toxicogenomics Gene Expression Profiling 3. Biomarkers of exposure and effect 4. Genomic approaches to study of toxic mechanisms 5. Toxicant “signature” profiling and predictive toxicology

  5. Cytochromes P450 Cytochromes P450 • Monooxygenase enzymes responsible for metabolism of >80% of all clinical drugs and many organic pollutants • Known roles in pollutant toxicity/carcinogenicity, drug-drug interactions, adverse drug effects, drug reactivity • Large, complex gene superfamily … ~2,500 individual genes in bacteria, fungi, plants and animals • Most animals have ~100 genes thought to be derived from a single common ancestor via extensive gene/genome duplication events • Many inducible CYPs regulated by transcription factors in nuclear receptor or bHLH-PAS gene (super)families

  6. Microarrays 101 Definitions: • Platforms for massively parallel hybridization assays • High-density arrays of 100s to 1000s of probe-containing features immobilized on a solid substrate Terminology: Traditional hybridizations (e.g. Northern, Southern, Western): target = immobilized sample (e.g.all RNAs/DNAs) probe = specific molecule of intrest in liquid phase Microarrays: target = sample in liquid phase probes = molecules of interest immobilized on substrate

  7. Microarrays 101 • Probe type • cDNA: gene expression profiling • GenomicDNA: CGH, ChIP-on-CHIP • Oligonucleotides 25-80mers spotted or synthesized in situ (photolithography or inkjet) • Proteins: enzyme activity, protein-protein interactions • Antibodies: protein expression • Cells: biochemical functions, gene expression • Tissuesections (TMA): high-throughput ISH or IHC

  8. Microarrays 101 • Substrate • Membranes (nylon, cellulose, etc.) • Coated glass slides • Poly L-lysine • g-amino poly-silane (GAPS) • sugars • Membrane-on-slide • Probe density • Low-density macroarrays (10-100s of features) • Moderate-density microarrays (1,000s) • High-density microarrays (10,000s)

  9. Radioactive detection Single sample per array Good sensitivity Fluorescent detection CAN apply multiple samples per array Less sensitive but more quantitative for changes A B A + B Microarrays 101

  10. Pharmacogenomics • Effect of polymorphisms on drug metabolism and toxic side effects of pharmaceutical agents • Oligonucleotide arrays can be used to identify presence of specific alleles in individuals, or to quantify allele ratios in populations e.g. Affymetrix CYP chip (18 known mutations defining 10 alleles of CYP2D6 and 2 alleles of CYP2C19) CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotypes protect against hepatitis C & cyrrhosis progression • Microelectronic arrays can improve sensitivity/accuracy in detecting single nucleotide differences

  11. The Thousand Dollar Genome Genome Resequencing Technologies • Sequencing by hybridization • Solid-phase multiplex PCR • Solexa TotalGenotyping with Single Molecule Arrays • Single molecule sequencing • Protein nanopore • U.S. Genomics

  12. Comparative Toxicogenomics • Species differences may exist at the level of gene complement, enzyme function (coding sequence), or transcriptional regulation (flanking genomic or intronic sequences) • Improved homology searching tools (combined with gene prediction) can be used to detect all members of a gene (super)family in a given genome • Evolutionary analyses full gene complements facilitate distinction of orthologous and paralogous relationships in large gene superfamily

  13. FunctionalToxicogenomics • Species comparisons can be used to identify regions of functional constraint or positive selection • Algorithms for motif detection can be used to predict regulatory elements (and possibly transcription factors) • cDNA microarrays can be used to assess gene expression • Antibody arrays can be used to assess protein levels • Protein arrays can be used to assess enzyme function

  14. Biomarker Arrays • Biomarker = biological response (ideally quantifiable) to an environmental chemical, which provides a metric of exposure and sometimes toxic effect(s); may be at the molecular, cellular or whole organism level. • Multiple-gene biomarkers are likely to be more sensitive and discriminating than single genes e.g. Larkin et al. (2003)  macroarrays for assessing exposure of fish to estrogenic compounds • Cost-effective • Well implemented • Non-model organism

  15. Genomic Approachesto Toxic Mechanisms • Toxicity of many compounds due to altered transcriptional regulation of gene expression • Gene expression profiling provides opportunities to identify affected molecular pathways and cellular functions • Platform(s)  cDNAs for oligonucleotides on glass slides • Competitive hybridization with two-channel fluorescent detection used to compare gene-specific relative expression levels between two conditions (except Affymetrix)

  16. * AHR-ARNT Estrogen-responsive genes • AHR Gene Battery • Cytochrome P450 1A (CYP1A) • Glutathione S Transferase • Oncogenes • Cytokines ? TOXICITY AHR signaling and Dioxin Toxicity

  17. “Adult Heart” Library Sinus venosus • TISSUE • 4+ cell-types • 10,000 genes? Atrium • cDNA LIBRARY • 76,800 clones • Unsequenced • Redundant Bulbus arteriosus Ventricle Connective tissue Smooth Muscle Endothelium Blood (>2 cell types)

  18. Adult Heart Microarrays • 4,896 AH clones • + ~100 controls/genes • of interest • 5,186 features • (~2,500 genes?)

  19. Control Sample Experimental Sample Prepare total RNA Prepare total RNA Generate amino-allyl modified cDNA Generate amino-allyl modified cDNA Label with fluorescent green dye (Cy3) Label with fluorescent red dye (Cy5) Microarray Analysis Gene (mRNA)Expression Profiling

  20. Equal Expression More Expression In Experimental More Expression In Control Control Experimental

  21. Data Analysis 2-fold

  22. CYP1A

  23. Dioxin-responsive genes INDUCTION 159 94 GENERALTRENDS • 361 clones differentially expressed (p-value  1*10-4) • 6 previously identified clones • 99 assembled into 17 contigs (15 known genes, 2 ESTs) • ~75 low quality sequence • Predominantly induction • Low-dose responses prevalent 41 0.5nM TCDD 5nM TCDD 1 58 54 SUPPRESSION

  24. Chemical Profiling and Predictive Toxicology • Diagnostic features determined from training set of compounds with known mechanisms of action • Methods for determining diagnostic subset include: • Self Organizing Maps (SOMs) and Neural networks • Bayesian statistics • Caveats • Must be certain about mechanisms of training compounds • Can only distinguish states represented in training set

  25. Thomas et al., 2001

  26. Thomas et al., 2001

More Related