1 / 1

COMPRESSIVE SENSING IN DT-MRI

Results for DT MRI. COMPRESSIVE SENSING IN DT-MRI. Daniele Perrone 1 , Jan Aelterman 1 , Aleksandra Pižurica 1 , Alexander Leemans 2 and Wilfried Philips 1. 1 Ghent University - TELIN - IPI – IBBT - St.-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.

aspen
Download Presentation

COMPRESSIVE SENSING IN DT-MRI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Results for DT MRI COMPRESSIVE SENSING IN DT-MRI Daniele Perrone1, Jan Aelterman1, Aleksandra Pižurica1, Alexander Leemans2 and Wilfried Philips1 1 Ghent University - TELIN - IPI – IBBT - St.-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium 2 Image Sciences Institute - University Medical Center - Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 Utrecht, the Netherlands. daniele.perrone@telin.ugent.be What is Diffusion Tensor MRI? Why shearlet transform? Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DT- MRI) can infer the orientation of fibre bundles within brain white matter tissue using so-called Fiber Tractography (FT) algorithms. The data capture step force to choose a trade off between data quality and acquisition time. Shearlets can represent natural image optimally with only a few significant (non-zero) coefficients, while noise and corruptions would need more coefficients. We can force a noise and artifact free reconstruction. f is C² (edges:piecewise C²) Approximation error: Fourier basis : εM ≤ C * M -1/2 Wavelet basis : ε M ≤ C * M -1 Shearlet tight frame : ε M ≤ C * (log(M))3 * M-2 MRI scanner Full brain acquisition ( axial view ) Brain tractography ( coronal view ) Fiber Tract. Split Bregman technique Formalization of the problem : x* = argmin |Sx| so that ||y – Fx||2 x IFFT * N ( N different directions ) xi+1 = argmin λ/2||Fx - yi||2 + μ/2||di - Sx -μi||2 di+1 = argmin |d| + μ/2||d - Sxi+1 - μi||2 μ=μi + Sxi+1 - di+1 goto 1 until convergence of μi+1 yi+1 = yi + y - Fxi+1 goto 1 until convergence of yi+1 1 x 2 d Split Bregman algorithm : 3 4 5 Focusing on the problem It is not possible to acquire fewer data without losing information and eventually generating corruption in images... …is it possible to discard only “superfluous” information? 6 CS No artifacts Image domain: experiment 50% of the coefficients used PSNR of the reconst. image: 40 dB Gibbs artifact : ABSENT Theoretical acquisition speedup: 2 The color image IFFT Gibbs ringing artifact in IMAGE DOMAIN IFFT Fiber Tractography SEED (corpus callosum - sagittal view) Wrong - even negative ! - eigenvalues in DIFFUSION TENSOR DOMAIN Brain tracts ( coronal view ) Fiber Tract. FFT Speeding up with Compressive Sensing • Considering just the Fourier samples that are not attenuated: • the number of samples is less than the number of • image pixels an infinite number of possible • image reconstructions; • naively filling in the missing data in Fourier space leads • to artifacts in MRI and therefore in FT reconstruction; • proposed: Compressive Sensing (CS) reconstruction • we have an infinite number of possible image reconstructions • we do want to maintain fidelity to the acquired data • we can choose the image that is representable with the LOWEST number of coefficients possible in the shearlet domain ( that corresponds to the minimum number of • image structures ) Fiber Tract. 50% FFT Compr. Sensing K-space reconstruction Fiber Tract. Promising quantitative improvements considering : - number of fiber tracts - mean length of the fiber tracts - fractional anisotropy - apparent diffusion coefficient - mean value and variance of the three eigenvalues

More Related