1 / 10

Why we don’t need ANTS (and active networks)…

Why we don’t need ANTS (and active networks)…. Johnny Ngan. By employing ANTS…. Increase overhead and latency Reduce at least 74% throughput Consume many more CPU cycles. Won’t use it anyway. Overview. Why active network is a dumb idea Why ANTS sucks. Santa’s view.

arturog
Download Presentation

Why we don’t need ANTS (and active networks)…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why we don’t need ANTS (and active networks)… Johnny Ngan

  2. By employing ANTS… • Increase overhead and latency • Reduce at least 74% throughput • Consume many more CPU cycles Won’t use it anyway

  3. Overview • Why active network is a dumb idea • Why ANTS sucks

  4. Santa’s view • If active network is so great, why not to have the whole network stack written in Java and running in user mode?

  5. Security issues • Running mobile code is dangerous • Java: the way to go? • New security attacks • Timing issues (e.g. SSH vulnerability)

  6. Won’t be useful • Routers won’t be “active” • Complicated, large overhead • Only implemented by end systems • And you used multicast as an example? • Why not just use IP/UDP?

  7. Overview • Why active network is a dumb idea • Why ANTS sucks

  8. Poor choices of language • Java is slow • Reduce at least 76% throughput • “the system is usable for experimenting with distributed application” • CPU overhead not discussed

  9. Freedom: Always the more the better? • Encourage nonstandard protocol • Emerging of TCP-unfriendly protocols • More congestion problems • DDoS is easier than ever! • Also easy to steal CPU cycles…

  10. Resource limiting is nontrivial • Adds to overhead • Can be done but hard to avoid overuse

More Related