1 / 18

Vacuum Stability Issues in the New Inner Triplet

Vacuum Stability Issues in the New Inner Triplet. V. Baglin. CERN AT-VAC, Geneva. 1. Vacuum physics in LHC 2. Vacuum requirements for IT phase 1 3. Beam screens 4. Conclusions. 1. Vacuum physics in LHC Photon stimulated desorption photon stimulated desorption

arturob
Download Presentation

Vacuum Stability Issues in the New Inner Triplet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vacuum Stability Issues in the New Inner Triplet V. Baglin CERN AT-VAC, Geneva 1. Vacuum physics in LHC 2. Vacuum requirements for IT phase 1 3. Beam screens 4. Conclusions V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  2. 1. Vacuum physics in LHC • Photon stimulated desorption • photon stimulated desorption • Electron multipacting (electron cloud) • electron stimulated desorption • heat load onto the beam screen • emittance growth • Ion induced pressure instability • Ion stimulated desorption • pressure runaway • beam loss V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  3. Ion induced pressure instability : ISR • Beam current stacking to 1 A • Pressure increases to 10-6 Torr • (x 50 in a minute) • Beam losses current pressure First documented pressure bump in the ISR E. Fischer/O. Gröbner/E. Jones 18/11/1970 V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  4. Ion induced pressure instability : model O. Gröbner, CERN 99-05 A.G. Mathewson, CERN ISR-VA/76-5 Reduction of the net pumping speed • Increase pumping speed (large conductance) • Decrease desorption yield (cleanliness) V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  5. 2. Vacuum requirement for IT phase 1 • Ensure vacuum stability • Provide an equivalent gas density less than 1013 H2/m3 i.e. 2.5 10-11 Torr at RT (A. Rossi, LHC PR 674). • IT characteristics • An operating temperature of 1.9 K • A gradient 120 T/m gradient • A length of ~ 10 m long for each quadrupole and a total of ~40 m for the IT • A cold bore diameter of ~ 15 cm • Due to the crossing angle, the beam are ~ 5 mm off-axis in the IT. This generates a synchrotron radiation of ~ 3 eV critical energy and 1/10 of the nominal LHC arc photon flux. • D1 generates also synchrotron radiation in the IT of ~ 6 eV critical energy and 1/4 of the nominal LHC arc photon flux (I.R. Collins, O.B. Malyshev, LHC PN 274). • Even in the case of the absence of multipacting, a gas load will be due to photon stimulated desorption • This gas will condense on the cold bore V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  6. Parameters at cryogenic temperature • ’H2 ~ 1 000 at 1 keV and 1 monolayer • (N. Hilleret, R. Calder, IVC, 1977). • The critical current is given by : • It is driven by the geometry, the gas species, the sticking probability, the primary and the recycling desorption yields V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  7. Option without beam screen • Critical current • Given the IT diameter (15 cm), a vacuum chamber longer than 5 m is considered to be infinite so that the pumping speed at the ends remain negligible. • We assume a sticking coefficient of unity (optimistic case) • Critical current : ’H2 ~ 2 000 at 1 monolayer ’co ~ 200 at 1 monolayer When the surface coverage approaches a few monolayers, the vacuum may become unstable V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  8. Option without beam screen When is the pressure runaway reached ? H2 CO The pressure runaway could be reached within 100 days and … V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  9. Option beam screen When is the gas density limit reached ?  = 1, photon flux = 1/10 of arc The gas density limit is reached in a few days !! V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  10. So, we need to control the gas density… V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  11. Option with beam screen No holes BS ~ 5 K Short vacuum chamber BS ~ 19 K CB ~ 4 K ~ 2% holes V. Baglin et al., LHC PR 435 A perforated beam screen allows to control the gas density V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  12. 3. Beam screens • Functionalities • Provide an equilibrium density and an equilibrium surface coverage defined by the hole’s pumping speed, C • Beam screens have a critical current of • In the arcs : (ion I)crit ~ 30 A for CO2 to 103 A for H2 • Actively cooled beam screens avoid thermal transients and therefore vacuum transients • Beam screens heaters allow a warm up to remove the condensed gas • The transparency of the beam screen defines the level of the pressure and of the surface coverage V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  13. Operation of beam screens • Beam screens operate in the range of 5 to 20 K (operation above 20 K must be avoided) • The cold bore at 1.9 K provides large pumping capacity for all gases except helium. • To avoid vacuum transients during operation, the beam screen temperature must be held above the cold bore temperature during cool down • After a quench, or in the case of oscillation in temperature, the beam screen must be warm up to flush the gas towards the cold bore • In the case of large heat load and / or pressure increase due to thick coverage of gases, the beam screen must be warm up to flush the gas towards the cold bore V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  14. Beam screen short term developments for IT phase 1 • Define the required transparency i.e. estimate of the gas load • Define the geometry, the material • Built prototypes • Validate • Production V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  15. Beam screen long term developments for LHC upgrade • Learn from LHC operation • Investigate and validate electron cloud mitigations (clearing electrodes, grooved chambers …) • Define beam screen parameters • Built prototypes • Scientific and engineering validation • Production V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  16. 4. Conclusion • The vacuum group recommends the installation of beam screens in the IT • A “scaling” of the present design is proposed in a first phase • After acquisition of know-how, upgrading of the beam screen technology could be foreseen for the LHC upgrade V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  17. Some references • Ion induced desorption coefficients for titanium alloy, pure aluminium and stainless steel. A.G. Mathewson. ISR-VA/76-5, March 1976. • Ion desorption of condensed gases. N. Hilleret, R. Calder. IVC 7, 1977. • Overview of the LHC vacuum system. O. Gröbner. Vacuum 60 (2001) 25-34. • Ion desorption stability ion the LHC. O.B. Malyshev, A. Rossi. VTN 99-20, December 1999. • First results from COLDEX applicable to the LHC cryogenic system. V. Baglin et al. LHC PR 435, September 2000. • Dynamic gas density in the LHC interaction regions 1&5 and 2&8 for optic version 6.3. I.R. Collins, O.B. Malyshev. LHC PN 274, December 2001. • Synchrotron radiation studies of the LHC dipole beam screen with COLDEX. V. Baglin et al. LHC PR 584, July 2002. • Running-in commissioning with beam. V. Baglin. LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix XII, January 2003 • Residual gas density estimations in the LHC experimental interaction regions. A. Rossi, N. Hilleret. LHC PR 674, September 2003. • Vacuum transients during LHC operation. V. Baglin. LHC Project Workshop – Chamonix XIII, January 2004. • Performance of a cryogenic vacuum system (COLDEX) with an LHC type beam. V. Baglin et al. Vacuum 73 (2004) 201-206. • Gas condensates onto a LHC type cryogenic vacuum system subjected to electron cloud. V. Baglin, B. Jenninger. LHC PR 742, August 2004. • Results from the scrubbing run 2004. N. Hilleret. LHC MAC December 2004. V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

  18. SEY of gas condensate N. Hilleret. LHC MAC December 2004 V. Baglin LIUWG, 27/09/07

More Related