slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
INTRODUCTION PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
INTRODUCTION

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 1

INTRODUCTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 74 Views
  • Uploaded on

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'INTRODUCTION' - artie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
There has been much research into reaction times based upon the stimulus applied. It has been mainly broken down into a visual stimulus vs. an auditory stimulus. Research has shown that an auditory stimulus yields lower reaction times when compared to a visual stimulus for the same subject. These two stimuli are being applied separately during these studies.

Also, one of the most investigated factors affecting reaction time is 'arousal' or state of attention, including muscular tension. Reaction time is fastest with an intermediate level of arousal, and deteriorates when the subject is either too relaxed or too tense (Welford, 1980; Broadbent, 1971; Freeman, 1933). That is, reaction time responds to arousal as follows:

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE

Subjects will be randomly selected from among the PLTW training staff, teachers and assistants. We will use 5 subjects. Each subject will perform each cue test 5 times.

The cues will be tested in order of auditory, visual, and then auditory and visual applied simultaneously.

The ruler will be held by experimenter 1, between the outstretched index finger and thumb of the subject’s hand, so that the top of the subject’s thumb is level with the zero centimeter line on the ruler (ruler drop).

Experimenter 1 will instruct the subject to catch the ruler as quickly as possible after receiving the cue (either auditory, visual or both simultaneously).

Experimenter 1 will release the ruler in a random cadence, and the subject will catch the ruler between their index finger and thumb.

Experimenter 2 will record the centimeters that dropped through the subject’s hand by measuring the centimeter mark at the top of the subject’s index finger.

This test will be repeated 4 more times, giving a total of 5 trials for each type of cue provided. The average of the 5 trials will be used for each subject, and the average of the 5 subjects will be used for each type of cue provided.

The constants in this experiment are the meter stick, experimenter 1 dropping the stick and providing cues, the background noise, subjects standing and gravity.

Reaction time will be measured in the number of cm that fall past the top of the subject’s index finger, and then converted to seconds via the formula -- t = Sqrt(2d/a)

METHODOLOGY

Students T-test was performed, t-values were obtained and degrees of freedom used to determine p-Values.

Auditory stimulus vs. Auditory/Visual Combination:

  • pValue > .0005

Visual stimulus vs. Auditory/Visual Combination:

  • pValue > .005

Both p-Values indicate very significant results with less than a 5% possibility of results occurring by chance.

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this experiment demonstrate the combination of the visual and auditory cue applied simultaneously was, in fact, markedly faster than auditory cues applied separately, and mildly faster than visual cues applied separately.

There were many errors with this research, which is too be expected considering the amount of time allowed to research, design and conduct the experiment. One error is tester error. When comparing such small amounts of time, the time between the auditory cue and the release of the stick may have varied by tenths of seconds. Another tester error will have been the measure of the stick to the top of the thumb. Once that has been set, the subject may have moved their hand. Another error may have occurred by not setting the distance of the thumb and the finger of the subject. The distance may have varied from test to test. Another tester error may have occurred from placement of the stick. If the stick was placed closer to the tip of the thumb or closer to the web of the thumb may have affected the subject’s ability to catch the stick. Another tester error was cadence. If the tester gets into a rhythm of catch and release that is similar, it allows the subject to anticipate the drop and score better results. Also the straightness of the stick used could have been an issue.

Another variable that likely skewed our results in comparison is the age of the subjects. This test was conducted by using random subjects who were available to devote time to this research. Subject ages were not uniform, and there can be a marked variance in reaction times based on age alone.

Throughout this experiment, there was an attempt to prove that a combination of senses is more effective than a single-sense stimuli alone. When comparing auditory to combination and visual to combination, our data proved our alternative hypothesis to be true, and thereby rejecting the null hypothesis.

REFERENCES

Mackenzie, B. (2004) Ruler Drop Test [WWW] Available from: http://www.brianmac.co.uk/rulerdrop.htm [Accessed 11/http://www.brianmac.co.uk/6/2013]

Welford, A. T. 1980. Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction Times. Academic Press, New York, pp. 73-128.

Freeman, G. L. 1933. The facilitative and inhibitory effects of muscular tension upon performance. American Journal of Psychology 26: 602-608.

Broadbent, D. E. 1971. Decision and Stress. Academic Press, London.

J. Shelton and G. Kumar, "Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction Times," Neuroscience & Medicine, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2010, pp. 30-32. doi: 10.4236/nm.2010.11004.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to thank:

All of our participants in this study

Project Lead The Way, Inc.

Terry Wilson and the lab assistants

We would also like to thank our Master Teacher – Peggy Hinzman

“You can dance if you want to….”

The purpose of this experiment was to determine if the application of the auditory and visual stimulus simultaneously would yield faster reaction time results than when the two stimuli were applied separately. This will be measured during the 3rd and 4th trials of the experiment. This is due to aforementioned research that shows the best reaction time measure occurring at intermediate arousal levels.

Alternative hypothesis: There will be a faster mean reaction time during the 3rd and 4th trials from an auditory and visual cue provided simultaneously than when they are provided separately.

Null hypothesis: There will be no significant difference of the mean reaction times produced during the 3rd and 4th trials from an auditory and visual cue combined and one produced when each stimulus is applied separately.

BI core training – Activity 2.1.4 physiology experiment

Todd Hamburg and Pamela Stewart

Effect of Simultaneous Application of Visual and Auditory Cues on Reaction Times

HYPOTHESIS