1 / 20

Using survey data to research family relationships

Using survey data to research family relationships. Angela Dale University of Manchester. Why would you?. Are family relationships well captured by surveys? Yes and No. The ‘yes’ bits. Surveys are good at capturing family structure and composition

aron
Download Presentation

Using survey data to research family relationships

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using survey data to research family relationships Angela Dale University of Manchester

  2. Why would you? • Are family relationships well captured by surveys? • Yes and • No

  3. The ‘yes’ bits • Surveys are good at capturing family structure and composition • Especially when the family is defined as being co-resident • Asking for information on everyone living together – and their relationships • Many surveys use a household matrix to capture the relationship of each person to allothers in the household

  4. Making linkages

  5. Relationships of other household members to person 1 (hholds with >1 person) How are the people in your household related to each other? 1 Spouse 4,905 2 Cohabitee 892 3 Son or daughter 6,319 4 Step-son/daughter 272 5 Foster child 11 6 Son/daughter-in-law 42 7 Parent/guardian 99 8 Step-parent 3 9 Foster-parent 0 10 Parent-in-law 23 11 Brother/sister 86 12 Step-brother/sister 2 13 Foster brother/sister 0 14 Brother/sister-in-law 13 15 Grandchild 144 16 Grand-parent 5 17 Other relative 32 18 Other non-relative 337 19 Civil Partner 6 Notes: adopted children are included with natural children. Source: GHS 2006, R01 – relationship to person 1

  6. Household type F (grouped) GHS, 2006 1 1 person only 2,722 2 2+ unrelated adults 549 3 married couple with dependent children 7,267 4 married couple, independent children 1,661 5 married couple, no children 5,208 6 lone parent, dependent children 1,937 7 lone parent, independent children 579 8 2+ families 460 9 same sex cohabitees 71 10 cohabiting couple, dependent children 1,265 11 cohabiting couple, independent children 53 12 cohabiting couple, no children 1,054

  7. More ‘yes’ bits • Understanding family processes is crucial to much social science • Effects of parental characteristics on child outcomes, eg educational attainment, obesity • Social mobility and the role of parental networks, informal support • Informal caring • Survey evidence provides one, but only one, important kind of knowledge on these topics

  8. Some questions • How many women aged 16-59 in Britain lived in three-generational households in 2001? • a) 2% b) 10% c) 20% • In 2001 were lone parents with dependent children more likely to be • Single, b) divorced, c) widowed,d) separated or e) married?

  9. Answers • How many women aged 16-59 in Britain lived in three-generational households in 2001? • a) 2% b) 10% c) 20% • In 2001 were lone parents with dependent children more likely to be a) Single (39%), b) divorced (35%), c) widowed (5%) d) separated (18%), e)married (3%)?

  10. Answers - Bangladeshis • How many women aged 16-59 in Britain lived in three-generational households in 2001? • a) 2% b) 10% c) 20% • In 2001 were lone parents with dependent children more likely to be a) Single (5%), b) divorced (12%), c) widowed (39%) or d) separated (23) married (30)?

  11. Who are you interested in? • Surveys allow you to explore: • Children - how do children’s educational outcomes relate to the number of siblings they have? • Partnerships – movement in and out of partnerships • the elderly – do they live alone or with other kin? Is this changing? How does it vary with socio-economic characteristics? With ethnicity? • Women – how is women’s employment influenced by that of their partner?

  12. The benefits of surveys • You can use large good quality surveys someone else has collected • You can get a nationally representative picture of the topic of interest • You can make comparisons between groups based on the same questions • You can make your own definitions of family – but depends on questions asked and answers recorded

  13. Family relationships: the ‘no’ bits • Surveys set their own agenda and ask everyone the same questions • Although good pilot work finds out salient issues from respondents you cannot pursue interesting answers; you cannot ask ‘why’ and ‘how’ and ‘what does it feel like’ • Respondents do not have their own voice • Some surveys provide space for write-ins

  14. Family relationships: the ‘no’ bits • The family is the site of conflict, intimacy, affection, rivalry ….. • Surveys cannot capture the depth of these relationships • Surveys are not good at capturing ambivalence

  15. Getting the best of both worlds? • Can one combine the strengths of surveys with the strengths of qualitative methods? • Yes, there are many good examples, but don’t forget that different methods produce different knowledge

  16. Surveys can provide a context for qualitative research • background information about the locality of a study • Information on the demographic structure of a group, or their socio-economic characteristics • Published data – or simple on-line extraction - can often give you exactly what you need

  17. Surveys can identify questions which need qualitative research • Surveys often throw up puzzles which need deeper, qualitative work to answer • eg why do many Pakistani and Bangladeshi women have low levels of economic activity? • Survey analysis can help to target a theoretical sample for deeper and richer analysis • Eg a comparison between key groups of Pakistani and white women • Analysis can be integrated, eg • survey analysis-> quali work -> better model with survey data

  18. Exploring differences • Surveys and qualitative methods can give conflicting accounts • Different methods generate different kinds of knowledge, so not surprising • But deeper interrogation using both methods can be very valuable • Can lead to greater understanding than either methods along • Neither method is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ but each can generate important questions for the other

  19. How to have a go • The Economic and Social Data Service provide access and support to many different surveys • Cross-section and longitudinal • Wide range of topics • On-line quick and easy access

  20. www.esds.ac.uk • Introductory workshops • Web-based resources • Getting started Guides • Guides to SPSS and STATA • Methodological Guides • Helpdesk

More Related