1 / 12

2010-2011 AMAOs

2010-2011 AMAOs. Scott W. Beaudry Testing Policy and Operations NC Department of Public Instruction. Today’s topics. AMAO Outcomes Definitions Timeline Tidbits Other reports Watchlist Title III Improvement Untested Questions. AMAO Outcomes - Definitions. AMAO 1 (Progress)

armand
Download Presentation

2010-2011 AMAOs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010-2011 AMAOs Scott W. Beaudry Testing Policy and Operations NC Department of Public Instruction

  2. Today’s topics • AMAO Outcomes • Definitions • Timeline • Tidbits • Other reports • Watchlist • Title III Improvement • Untested • Questions

  3. AMAO Outcomes - Definitions AMAO 1 (Progress) Definition: one or more of the following in terms of the overall composite proficiency score on the annual English language proficiency test: 1) increase to the next English language proficiency level; 2) increase the previous score by 0.5; or 3) reach the Comprehensive Objective Composite (COC). 2010-2011 target: 55.1% Changes since last year: redefined

  4. AMAO Outcomes - Definitions AMAO 2 (Proficiency) Definition: meet the Comprehensive Objective Composite (COC) by reaching an overall composite score of 4.8 or above, with at least a 4.0 on the reading subtest and at least a 4.0 on the writing subtest on the state’s annual English language proficiency test for kindergarten and Tiers B or C in grades 1-12 2010-2011 target:12.4% Changes since last year: none (year 2)

  5. AMAO Outcomes - Definitions AMAO 3 (AYP) Definition: Status on AMAO 3 is based on the performance of the LEP subgroup (using the same decision rules used for AYP at the LEA level for Title I ) on four sub-targets (two subject areas at two grade spans). Performance on each subtarget is shown by functioning on two goals: Proficiency and 95% Participation 2010-2011 target: All subject/grade span/goal combinations “met” Changes since last year: none

  6. AMAO Outcomes - Timeline Preliminary AMAO Outcomes Report sent to LEP Coordinators yesterday (9/14/2011) LEAs have until 9/30 to review (2.5 weeks) Final AMAO Outcomes Report presented to November SBE meeting

  7. AMAO Outcomes - Tidbits Tidbits (preliminary) • There were 90 Title III sub grantees • 105,507 K-13 students enrolled during testing • 3,549 (3.4%) of those students do not have test results (aka they are untested).

  8. AMAO Outcomes - Tidbits 37 LEAs did not meet AMAO 1 6 LEAs did not meet AMAO 2 55 LEAs did not meet AMAO 3 66 LEAs did not meet the AMAOs* *29 of these did not meet AMAO 3 only.

  9. Other Reports Title III Watchlist • Derived from the AMAO Outcomes report. • Only includes LEAs who met the AMAOs in the previous year, but did not meet the AMAOs this year. • A preliminary Watchlist will be sent out this week.

  10. Other Reports cont’d Title III Improvement • Derived from the AMAO Outcomes report • Includes LEAs who did not meet the AMAOs for 2 or more years • Is presented to the SBE

  11. Other Reports cont’d ACCESS Untested • A count of students enrolled during the testing window who do not have ACCESS test scores; presented by LEA • LEP staff factor these results into a risk-based analysis for monitoring • LEP staff contact LEAs with unacceptably high percentages

  12. Questions? Scott W. Beaudry scott.beaudry@dpi.nc.gov

More Related