1 / 20

EPR-Public Communications L-011

EPR-Public Communications L-011. Good Practices for PIOs. Objective. To review good practices to improve effectiveness of communications before , during and after an emergency; How to apply these practices in planning communication for a radiological or nuclear emergency.

arlenec
Download Presentation

EPR-Public Communications L-011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EPR-Public CommunicationsL-011 Good Practices for PIOs

  2. Objective • To review good practices to improveeffectiveness of communications before, during and after an emergency; • How to applythese practices in planning communication for a radiological or nuclearemergency.

  3. Outline • Review: Good communications practices; • Putting practices into action.

  4. Review: Good communications practices • Give people things they can do; • Don’t delay in communicating about risk; • Provide as much relevant information, as soon as possible; it can be updated. • If information needs to be changed as the emergency evolves, clearly explain why to avoid loss of credibility and trust; • Initial perceptions will “frame” the risk in the public’s mind; • Once the risk has been framed it will be difficult to shift this perception.

  5. Review: Good communications practices • Communicate clearly about who is at risk and who is not; • Plan how to deal with increased anxiety; • Consider the perspective of the audience in developing information and messages to be communicated; • Consider pre-existing knowledge and language skills; • Use plain language in explaining scientific and technical information.

  6. Review: Good communications practices • Prepare as much information in advance as possible; • Anticipate likely questions and prepare answers in advance.

  7. Review: Good communications practices • Identify effective communications channels in advance; • Consider the risks and benefits of both controlled and uncontrolled channels.

  8. Review: Good communications practices • Use the internet to its full advantage; • Plan for high use demands of an emergency —bandwidth and low graphic versions; • Listserv for users to sign up for updates; • Enhanced media relations; • Monitor the Internet for misinformation and rumours; • Mobile phones have made it possible to broadcast text messages with emergency information.

  9. Review: Learning from past practices IAEA Public Communications during the response to TEPCO’s Fukushima-Daiichi NPP accident • Insufficient bandwidth to meet demand • Caused long delays in web site response; • Site required 45 times more bandwidth than normal; • Limited web site access • For first three weeks, web site access was often not possible, led to public criticism of IAEA; • Use of Facebook • To overcome initial black-out period, all emergency content was posted on Facebook, which remained visible without loss through the emergency period;

  10. Putting practices into action • Plan for possible types of emergencies; • Identify which nuclear technology and radiation sources are in use; • Are these sources fixed or mobile?

  11. Putting practices into action IAEA Threat Categories I—facilities, such as nuclear power plants, which could give rise to severe deterministic health effects; II—facilities, such as research reactors, which could give rise to significant off-site doses; III—facilities, such as industrial irradiation facilities, which could give rise to significant on-site doses; IV—activities that could warrant urgent protective actions in an unforeseeable location; V—activities, not normally involving radiation, which could be contaminated as a result of events at a category I or II facility.

  12. Putting practices into action What will need to be communicated and to whom: • Technology; • Isotopes; • Possible protective actions; • Duration; • Affected audience; • Warning • Give people something they can do.

  13. Putting practices into action How to plan for this communication: • Duration of response; • Expected public information activities; • Facilities and number of staff required; • Supporting services; • Developing a roster and assigning staff; • Training required; • Shifts required.

  14. Putting practices into action • Working through these elements will help you create a practical response plan for public information during an emergency; • This plan can be further refined by considering other scenarios, particularly those involving mobile sources of radiation, as these can occur anywhere.

  15. Putting practices into action • Prepare standardized templates in advance: • “Holding Statements”; • Press releases; • Media advisories; • Fact sheets on radioisotopes or facilities where a radiation emergency could occur.

  16. Sample holding statement Sample Holding Statement (For use before specific information is available): Date: [date of issue] [News Release Number] Time: [time of issue]   [Organization name] confirms that it has received a report of [nature of event]. According to the information received at this time, the [event] occurred at [time and location]. Reports indicate that [any confirmed information on the event] and that [any initial measures] measures are being taken to protect [the public, responders, products, trade, or specify as appropriate]. The [specify plan as appropriate] emergency plan has now been activated [and we have activated our public information centre]. [Organization name] is coordinating its activities with responders now at the scene and other involved agencies [specify as appropriate]. We will be providing further information as soon as it becomes available. [Provide details on timing of any updates or briefings]. The next [briefing/update] will take place at [location and/or time].  ———————  For further information: Name [name of contact for the media]: Title [title of media contact]: Organization: Telephone: Mobile: Email: Website:

  17. Putting practices into action • Train staff who could be involved in communicating during an emergency: • Response structure to be used and reporting up; • Plans, procedures and checklists; • Approval procedures; • Radiation protection and emergency measures. • Practice regularly by participating in emergency simulation exercises and drills.

  18. Opportunities to engage the media • Find opportunities to engage the media through proactive media relations activities: • Emergency simulation exercises; • Training opportunities for journalists and editors; • Establish regular contact with key media; • Build positive relations with all media by responding in a timely fashion to their requests for information or interviews.

  19. Putting practices into action • Develop a communications plan for the recovery phase; • Communications must take into account the scale of the impact of remediation measures on different communities; • Need to communicate any decontamination measures ongoing or planned; • Communicate about any risks, pathways, countermeasures, dose estimates, monitoring programs, food restrictions and effectiveness of clean up measures; • When permitting people to return, any remaining contamination and risks will need to be communicated clearly; • Consider involving those affected in remediation decisions.

  20. A final thought Remember: you will communicate better with people if you can think as they are thinking.

More Related