1 / 13

M&M Case Presentations: Measuring Resident Competency

M&M Case Presentations: Measuring Resident Competency. Mary C. Santos, MD, Manizheh Eghbali, MPH and Linnea S. Hauge, Ph.D. Disclosures. Nothing to disclose. Background. ACGME requirements Lack of tools available Use of existing conferences. Development. ACGME definitions and toolbox

arin
Download Presentation

M&M Case Presentations: Measuring Resident Competency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. M&M Case Presentations: Measuring Resident Competency Mary C. Santos, MD, Manizheh Eghbali, MPH and Linnea S. Hauge, Ph.D.

  2. Disclosures • Nothing to disclose

  3. Background • ACGME requirements • Lack of tools available • Use of existing conferences

  4. Development • ACGME definitions and toolbox • Faculty input • Medical education research group at University of Rochester • Surgical Education Research

  5. Reliability • 3 faculty members • Individual education sessions • Implementation • Total scores • Cohen’s kappa 0.621 • Cronbach’s alpha 0.749

  6. Design • Pre-test post-test design • M&M conference unchanged • Residents not informed about evaluations for first month of data collection • Resident education session • Data collection for another month • 2 separate groups of residents evaluated

  7. Results • 35 observations pre-instruction, 32 post-instruction • No change in overall total score • Improvement in case presentation • Improvement in overall practice-based learning scores • No change SBP overall scores • Decreased discussion of involvement of other healthcare personnel

  8. Results

  9. Limitations • Small number of participants • May not be generalizable • 3-point scale used • Used groups of convenience

  10. Discussion • M&M conferences can be evaluated with a tool to measure SBP and PBLI • In our institution, the tool is reliable and can be utilized as one of the instruments for measurement of SBP and PBLI • Minimal changes are noted in resident competency before and after a single educational intervention

  11. Future Directions • Utilize in other conferences • Multi-institution study

More Related