1 / 34

Effectiveness of a Constructivist-Based Learning Approach in Improving Conceptual Understanding of the Causes of Seasons

Effectiveness of a Constructivist-Based Learning Approach in Improving Conceptual Understanding of the Causes of Seasons on Earth. Master’s Thesis Defense Candidate : Jacob Gontesky Advisors : Rebecca Krystyniak Anthony Hansen Patricia Simpson Jean Hoff July 20 th , 2006. Overview.

arianna
Download Presentation

Effectiveness of a Constructivist-Based Learning Approach in Improving Conceptual Understanding of the Causes of Seasons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effectiveness of a Constructivist-Based Learning Approach in Improving Conceptual Understanding of the Causes of Seasons on Earth Master’s Thesis Defense Candidate: Jacob Gontesky Advisors: Rebecca Krystyniak Anthony Hansen Patricia Simpson Jean Hoff July 20th, 2006

  2. Overview • Introduction • Review of the Literature • Methods and Procedures • Results • Conclusions, Inferences, and Recommendations Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  3. I. Introduction Problem Statement: • Misconceptions exist, are persistent, and are significant barriers to obtaining complete scientific literacy • Purpose: • Investigate the effect of a particular teaching strategy on changing students’ conceptual understanding. Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  4. Research Questions • What is the initial level of conceptual understanding? • What is the frequency and nature of misconceptions? • How persistent are such misconceptions over time? • What degree of long-term conceptual change results from the lesson? Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  5. Limitations of the Study • No control group • Time constraints • Population • Restricted to Seasons concepts Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  6. II. Literature Review • Behaviorism vs. Constructivism • Ormrod, 2003 • Alverman & Phelps, 2002 • How does this look in Science? • Science as inquiry • Less Lecture, more hands-on; Labs • Increasing in standards Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  7. Identification & Assessment of Misconceptions • Survey Techniques: • Quantitative, large populations, limited in depth (Gould, Willard, & Pompea, 2000; Trundle, Atwood & Christopher, 2002) • Interview Techniques: • Qualitative, smaller populations, greater depth (Atwood & Atwood, 1996) • Pre- and Post-Test Techniques • Explore conceptual change over time (Nussbaum & Novak, 1976; Trundle et al., 2002) Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  8. Considerations • Isolating concepts is difficult • Mixed-method research technique: • Harness strengths of each • Drawbacks of each are minimized (Novak & Nussbaum, 1976) Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  9. III. Methods and Procedures • General Study Design: • Population: Introductory Atmospheric Science Course, Fall 2004 • Frequency, nature, and persistence of misconceptions • Mixed Method Data Collection: • Surveys • Interviews with models Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  10. Models Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  11. Data Collection Timeline Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  12. IV. Results • Seasons Lesson Treatment • Surveys • Conceptual change • Interviews • Coding • Qualitative results Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  13. Seasons Lesson Treatment • “Seasons” (Riverside Scientific, Inc) • One-dimensional (latitude) energy balance model • Manipulated variables: • Tilt of Earth’s axis • Shape of Earth’s orbit around the sun • Surface temperature displayed • Followed by in-class discussion/demo Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  14. RSI “Seasons” Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  15. Survey Results:Paired Samples t-testOverall Conceptual Change Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  16. Interview Scoring • Scoring rubric purpose • Development • Three factors • Each interview scored • Rubric analyzed, & revised • 3rd & final rubric developed • Score 0: No conceptual understanding • Score 6: Full conceptual understanding Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  17. Interview Results • RQ #1: Initial Level of Understanding • RQ #2: Frequency of Alternative Conceptions Pretest Interview Results (First Round) Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  18. Interview Results • RQ #3: How persistent are alternative conceptions immediately following the lesson? Post Test Interview Results (2nd Round) Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  19. t-Test: Interview Rounds 1 & 2n=5, df=4 • RQ #3: How persistent are alternative conceptions immediately following the lesson? Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  20. Individual Interview Results • Examined for evidence of long-term conceptual change (RQ#4) • Qualitative approach • Individual change rather than change in means Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  21. Overall Interview Scores over Time Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  22. V. Conclusions, Inferences, & Recommendations • Conclusions • Pre-instruction • Surveys • Interviews • Discussion • Comprehensive overview • Data collection techniques • Educational Implications • Recommendations for Further Research Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  23. Conclusions: Pre-instruction • Majority of students enter with alternative conceptions • Interviews: 62.5%, Survey: 70% (Ashcraft & Courson, 2003) • Students are not tabula rasa (Minstrell, 1993, Trowbridge et al., 2000) • Triangulation = comprehensive conclusions Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  24. Survey Contributions: Overall Scores • Immediate conceptual change • Mean scores remained elevated • Conclusion: • Conceptual change was lasting Trowbridge, et al (2000) Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  25. Survey Contributions:Scientific Conceptions • Lasting conceptual change • Lesson treatment: • Explicit Manipulation • Earth’s Axis Tilt • Sunlight Intensity • Both also demonstrated in class • Conclusion: • Value of explicit variable manipulation Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  26. Survey Contributions:Alternative Conceptions • Little change over time • No explicit manipulation of alternative conceptions • Conclusion: • Lack of attention by lesson (Ormrod, 2003; Sewell, 2002) Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  27. Interview Contributions • Conceptual change: • Short-lived increase in overall score • Short-lived drop in alternative conceptions • Interview Conclusion: • Conceptual change was not lasting • At odds with survey data Why? Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  28. Comprehensive Conclusions Existing Research Comprehensive Conclusions Surveys Interviews Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  29. Comprehensive Overview of Conceptual Change • Full support: • Alternative conceptions exist • Constructivist-based lesson approach is effective in short-term • Discrepancies: • Surveys support lasting change • Interviews conclude change was not long term Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  30. Surveys vs. Interviews • Surveys: • “Entry Level” • Analyze 1st stages of conceptual change • Interviews: • Deeper Understanding • Analyze comprehensive conceptual change: synthesis and application Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  31. Surveys vs. Interviews Assessment Tool Short-lived Conceptual Change Complexity of Thought Interviews Lasting Conceptual Change Surveys Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  32. Educational Implications • Support for continued development and use of constructivism • Constructivist approaches should be expanded in applications & frequency • Alternative conceptions should be explicitly addressed Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  33. Recommendations for Further Research • Incorporate a control • Observe subject use of software • Strengths and weaknesses • “Think aloud” interview • Assess between lesson parts • Demographic details Gontesky - Thesis Defense

  34. Any Questions? Gontesky - Thesis Defense

More Related