1 / 20

The Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for LICs

The Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for LICs. Paris, May 23, 2007 Martine Guerguil International Monetary Fund. Outline of the presentation. Why a specific framework is needed for low-income countries Description of the debt sustainability framework for low-income countries

aretha-rios
Download Presentation

The Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for LICs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for LICs Paris, May 23, 2007 Martine Guerguil International Monetary Fund

  2. Outline of the presentation • Why a specific framework is needed for low-income countries • Description of the debt sustainability framework for low-income countries • Use of the framework and challenges

  3. The Debt Sustainability Framework • Developed by the IMF in 2002 in the context of surveillance, to better monitor debt issues in emerging markets • The DSF is intended to serve as an “early warning system” of potential risks of debt distress so that preventive action can be taken in time • It helps countries in determining appropriate financing strategies to maintain/achieve debt sustainability

  4. Why a special framework is needed for low-income countries • Their debt has special features • A large part is granted on concessional terms • Longer maturities than emerging market debt • Their economies have special features • They are more vulnerable to exogenous shocks • Higher incidence of natural disasters, terms of trade shocks, conflicts • Higher impact of shocks on their economies • They have more limited institutional capacities • Information on their macroeconomic and debt situation is scarce, segmented

  5. A growing need in the current environment • LICs have larger borrowing opportunities: • Debt relief for the most indebted • Scaling up prospects from traditional creditors • The emergence of new private and official creditors • These changes provide opportunities for faster output and income growth... • … But they need to be managed in order to avoid too rapid a build-up of debt

  6. The Joint Bank-Fund DSF • The Bank and Fund have jointly developed – and recently strengthened – an instrument to analyze debt challenges in LICs: • The Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries (DSF) • It takes a long-term perspective (20-year forecasts) and uses NPV terms to account for the specificities of LIC debt • It explicitly links the risk of debt distress to the size of the debt burden, the type of exogenous shocks, and the quality of policies and institutions • It generates a debt distress risk rating for each LIC • The DSF is not the framework used in the context of the HIPC Initiative; it serves a different purpose.

  7. Three “Pillars” • Twenty-year projections of debt burden ratios under baseline and alternative scenarios

  8. Three “Pillars” • Twenty-year projections of debt burden ratios under baseline and alternative scenarios • Risk ratings based on policy-dependent indicative debt-burden thresholds

  9. Notes: Thresholds apply to public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) external debt, only. The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) assesses the quality of a country’s present policy and institutional framework. “Quality” means how conducive that framework is to fostering sustainable, poverty-reducing growth and the effective use of development assistance.

  10. Four debt distress risk ratings • Low risk of debt distress • Moderate risk of debt distress • High risk of debt distress • In debt distress

  11. Three “Pillars” • Twenty-year projections of debt burden ratios under baseline and alternative scenarios • Risk ratings based on policy-dependent indicative debt-burden thresholds • Recommended borrowing strategy and possible financing responses from lenders

  12. Other DSF Features • Conducted on an annual basis, which allows for corrections/adjustments • Two parallel exercises: for external debt and for domestic debt • Standardization facilitates cross-country comparisons, but does not prevent tailoring to country circumstances

  13. Main Objectives • Improve World Bank and IMF analysis and policy advice in these areas and guide provision of needed technical assistance • Support LICs in achieving their development objectives while maintaining sustainable levels of debt • Provide information to potential creditors on debt sustainability prospects and risks so that they can modulate their financing accordingly

  14. Use of the DSF • The DSF has already had an impact on Bank and Fund policies • IDA financing terms • IMF policy advice and program design • However, the DSF will be effective only if both other creditors and borrowing countries use it for their own purposes

  15. Use by Borrowers • Design appropriate financing strategies = a debt path that matches financing with ability to repay • A key element for broader policy design • Near term: determine the fiscal stance and appropriate financing terms • Medium term: implement preventive action to reduce the risk of future debt distress • A tool for discussions with creditors on the size and terms of financing • Identification of technical assistance needs in the area of debt management

  16. Further Use by Creditors • The IMF and the World Bank are stepping up outreach to major creditor groups • MDBs • Traditional bilateral creditors • Export credit agencies • Emerging creditors • The objective is to encourage creditors to acknowledge the different nature of lending and debt sustainability risks in LICs • LICs remain and will remain for some time dependent on official assistance • Debt relief has not eliminated their main sources of vulnerability • DSAs can be a useful input for “sustainable” lending decisions • Published DSAs can be found at www.imf.org/dsa

More Related