1 / 18

How do we assess outcomes that don’t have a specific “home” in the curriculum?

How do we assess outcomes that don’t have a specific “home” in the curriculum? . Striving for Deep Learning: Ethical Reasoning, Global Perspective, and Other Elusive Learning Goals. Facilitator Contact Information. Roberta C. Teahen , Ph.D. Associate Provost Ferris State University

annis
Download Presentation

How do we assess outcomes that don’t have a specific “home” in the curriculum?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How do we assess outcomes that don’t have a specific “home” in the curriculum? Striving for Deep Learning: Ethical Reasoning, Global Perspective, and Other Elusive Learning Goals

  2. Facilitator Contact Information Roberta C. Teahen, Ph.D. Associate Provost Ferris State University Big Rapids, MI 49307 teahenr@ferris.edu

  3. “Adults are facing unprecedented challenges in almost every sphere of life, and the consequences for learning are real and dramatic. They are stretched to learn continuously, and transformatively, in a world that demands higher-order thinking. . . Today, adults need to transform deeply held frames of reference to make sense of their experience in ways better suited to increasingly complex demands.” • Marsick, V.

  4. Framing Questions • What purposes do we intend in these elusive areas? • To what degree is a curriculum grounded in articulated educational values, assumptions, and learning principles that other educators can examine and debate? • What educational theories or frameworks underlie a curriculum? • What is the guiding philosophy for general education or “broad educational goals?”

  5. Exploring Meanings • Deep Learning • Ethical Reasoning • Global Perspective • Other elusive learning goals. . .

  6. Related Constructs • Transformative Learning • Pedagogy of the Oppressed • Liberal Education • 21st Century Skills • General Education • Ways of knowing • Sense making • Operations learning vs. comprehension learning • Metacognition

  7. Transformative Learning Defined • Transformative learning refers to learning that results in deep change or a transformation of our tacitly acquired frames of reference - composed of sets of assumptions and expectations - that determine, filter, and often distort the way we think, feel, decide, and act. • Transformative learning has been defined in terms of critical examination and fundamental change in problematic frames of reference (meaning perspectives, habits of mind, or basic mindsets). Transformation enables people to alter their mindsets in ways that are more inclusive, discriminating, open, reflective, and emotionally able to change. Such frames are likely to generate beliefs and opinions that will prove more true or justified to guide action than other frames of reference. • Marsick and Mezirow, 2002 (Emphasis added above.)

  8. Deep vs. Surface Learning What constructs define deep learning? “When adopting a surface approach to learning, the learners are focusing on surface characteristics of the situation, on the very working of a text being read, of the argument put forward, on figures in a problem, on formulas to be used for solving a problem. They want to be able to answer the questions they are anticipating.” • (Bowden & Marton, 1998, p. 8).

  9. “When adopting a deep approach to learning the learners are focusing on the object [goal, purpose] of learning, they are trying to get hold of the phenomenon dealt with in the text they are reading or in the presentation they are listening to. In problem solving they are initially trying to grasp the problem…they do not immediately aim at being able to recall a text or to come up with an answer to the problem given…The quality of the outcomes of learning is functionally related to the approaches adopted by the learners.” (emphasis added) • (Bowden & Marton, 1998, pp. 8–9)

  10. Learning Principle for Learning That Lasts “Learning that lasts is deep and expansive, purposeful and responsible. • When learning endures, a learner has the habits of deep inquiry, delving into meaning, developing further levels of expertise, and letting imagination serve productive creativity. Such learning means looking beneath the surface for hidden causes, exploring larger systems, and appreciating nuances. (Mentkowski, M., & Associates, 2000, p. 246)

  11. Contrasts in Approach to Learning (v.1)

  12. Version 2

  13. Learning Conversations • If we wish to promote deep learning, what pedagogical approaches might be employed? • How would we “discover” when deep learning exists? • How does deep learning relate to the “elusive goals” (global, ethical reasoning) • What are other examples of these elusive goals?

  14. What are the characteristics of courses that incline students toward a surface approach? • An excessive amount of material in the curriculum • Relatively high class contact hours • An excessive amount of course material • A lack of opportunity to pursue subjects in depth • A lack of choice over subjects and a lack of choice over the method of study • A threatening and anxiety provoking assessment system

  15. Global Awareness • Reference AACU Document • See Chaffey College site http://www1.chaffey.edu/slo/toolkit.html • College and Beyond instrument • www.ferris.edu/academicaffairs/assessment • Other examples. . . .

  16. Let’s look at other concepts Ethical Reasoning • In addition to the ability to distinguish purely ethical terms from those that are theological or conventional, skilled ethical reasoning presupposes the same range of intellectual skills and traits required in other domains. One must be skilled in breaking reasoning down into its component parts. One must be proficient in assessing reasoning for its clarity, accuracy, relevance, depth, breadth, and logicalness. One must be intellectually humble, intellectuallyperseverant, and intellectually empathic. • Elder and Paul

  17. References • Elder and Paul, http://www.criticalthinking.org/files/SAM-EthicalReasoning20051.pdf • http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/dands/dandstable.html - Retrieved 7/19/2010 • http://www.ntlf.com/html/pi/9512/download.pdf • http://www.ntlf.com/html/ti/v19n4comp.pdf • Marsick, V. Transformative learning from experience in the knowledge era. Daedalus, Fall 1998. • New Work on Transformative Learning. http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=10876

More Related