1 / 5

DISTILLATE Product G2

DISTILLATE Product G2. Dr Ann Jopson University of Leeds, 21 st May 2007. Local Scheme Assessment. A decision aid, NOT a decision maker Suitable for assessing local schemes of any size (in terms of cost, and magnitude of impacts) Can run a ‘mini-NATA’ if desired

annice
Download Presentation

DISTILLATE Product G2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DISTILLATE Product G2 Dr Ann Jopson University of Leeds, 21st May 2007

  2. Local Scheme Assessment • A decision aid, NOT a decision maker • Suitable for assessing local schemes of any size (in terms of cost, and magnitude of impacts) • Can run a ‘mini-NATA’ if desired • Will help to prioritise schemes contributing to an objective, or set of objectives • Can also compare projects contributing to different objectives • Excel assessment matrix • Indicators represent national, regional and local objectives • Authorities can pick and mix from our set, and/or add their own • Authorities weight indicators, then assess impact of project(s) using Likert scales • Weight and scale combined to give prioritisation

  3. Indicators • Starting point: DISTILLATE C • Other sources • Government policy: • NATA • LTP guidance • Best value performance indicators (BVPI) • Offers guidance on local indicators • Accessibility • ITS projects looking at journey quality, indicators and modelling indicators • Indicators need to be disaggregated • E.g., Greenhouse gases, local air pollution, noise, green space… not just the environment

  4. Weighting and impact assessment • Weight indicators according to local priorities • LTP likely to be a starting point • Weight each indicator on a scale of 0 – 5 • 0 being irrelevant • Assess impact of scheme on scale of…? • 1 to 4 (no mid point forces a –ve/+ve decision, neutral isn’t an option) • 1 to 5 • 1 to 7 • 1 being minimal impact • 0 weighted indicators should not be assessed • Multiply weight by impact assessment to obtain value • Low value: project may not be worthwhile?

More Related