1 / 10

Semantic memory structure: Evidence to be accounted for

Semantic memory structure: Evidence to be accounted for. What evidence can be brought to bear on the question of semantic memory structure?. Long Term Memory (LTM). Episodic memory - memory for events that we “remember” Procedural memory - memory for how to do stuff; automatic processes

annewarren
Download Presentation

Semantic memory structure: Evidence to be accounted for

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Semantic memory structure:Evidence to be accounted for What evidence can be brought to bear on the question of semantic memory structure?

  2. Long Term Memory (LTM) • Episodic memory - memory for events that we “remember” • Procedural memory - memory for how to do stuff; automatic processes • Semantic (declarative) memory - memory for facts about the world

  3. Semantic memory • What is the purpose of semantic memory? • Beyond just storage, what functional role does semantic memory serve in our daily lives? Many-to-many mapping!

  4. The Evidence • Category-specific deficits (e.g., Warrington & McCarthy, 1983, 1987; Warrington & Shallice, 1984; Gainotti & Silveri, 1996) • Patients show impairments in processing living things vs. man-made objects and vice versa. • Interesting exceptions: fruits, vegetables & other foods; musical instruments • Modality-specific deficits • Patients are unable to name visually presented objects, but can name them from other modalities and can access other semantic information about visually presented stimuli (Beauvois, 1982) • Other visual processing is fine.

  5. More evidence • Brain-imaging (Martin et al., 1995; Martin et al., 1996) • Brain areas associated with visual processing more active when animals are being named; • Areas associated with generating action words or imagining actions active when naming man-made objects • Areas associated with color perception are active when color words are generated, even for man-made objects • Areas associated with motion perception are active when action words are generated for man-made object

  6. Evidence (cont.) • Naming vs. Categorization (Potter & Faulconer, 1976; Guenther et al., 1980, Seifert, 1997) • Faster to name words vs. pictures • Faster to categorize pictures vs. words • Stroop-like effects (Glaser, 1992; Glaser & Glaser, 1989) • Incongruent words interfere with pictures more than pictures interfere with words in a naming task • Incongruent pictures interfere with words more than words interfere with pictures in a categorization task

  7. Split-brain patients • An old treatment for epilepsy was to sever the corpus callosum, the band of neurons connecting the two hemispheres of the brain. • Verbal information is clearly processed in the left hemisphere, while more visual cognition seems to be processed in the right.

  8. Competing theories • Unitary Content Hypothesis • Semantic information is stored in an abstract, amodal format organized by category. • Multiple Semantics Hypothesis • Semantic information is stored in many modality-specific semantic subsystems. Information in each subsystem is stored in a modality specific format. • Our intuitive sense of information being organized by categories is based on strong connections between related parts of these modality-specific semantic systems.

  9. Unitary Content Hypotheses (UCH)(Caramazza et al., 1990; Caramazza & Shelton, 1998; Riddoch et al., 1988; Pylyshyn, 1973)

  10. Multiple Semantics Hypotheses (MSH)(Paivio, 1971; Beauvois, 1982; Shallice, 1987, 1988; McCarthy & Warrington, 1988)

More Related