1 / 35

Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship

Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship. By David S. Evans and Linda S. Leighton Agata Narożnik Levan Bzhalava. Introduction. 4.2 million people operate business on a full time basis. They employ tenth of all wage workers Self-employed has increase since mid-1970s. Small Firms.

anne-levine
Download Presentation

Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship By David S. Evans and Linda S. Leighton AgataNarożnik LevanBzhalava

  2. Introduction • 4.2 million people operate business on a full time basis. • They employ tenth of all wage workers • Self-employed has increase since mid-1970s

  3. Small Firms • Major source of industrial changes • Creating a disproportionate share of new jobs • Many states have programs to stimulate small-firm formation

  4. Great Britain, France, Belgium, Netherlands Helping unemployed workers start business

  5. Determinants of self-employment?

  6. Contents • I - Data description. • II - Statistics on self-employment entry and exit over the life cycle and report estimates. • III - Determinants of self-employments earnings • IV - Conclusion

  7. Data description • The National Longitudinal Survey (NLS) • White men between 14-24 in 1966 • Surveyed yearly between 1966 and 1971 and 1973, 1975, 1976, 1978, 1980 and 1981 • 1966 – 3918 respondents • 1981 – 2731 respondents

  8. Data description • The March Supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS) for 1968-1987 • 150000 white men between age 18-65 • Information on the employment status for the survey year and for the previous

  9. Entry and Exit over the life cycle • Simple time-homognous Markov model • The probability that an individual will operate business T years after entering the labour force is: • e – probability of entering the self-employment • x – probability of exiting self-employmet

  10. Entry and Exit over the life cycle

  11. Entry and Exit over the life cycle

  12. Entry and Exit over the life cycle

  13. Entry and Exit over the life cycle

  14. Expected utility of self employmet Expected utility of wage work Entering self-employment > THAN Individual switchs to self-employment

  15. Entering Self-employmet • The probability of switching into self-employment increases with net worth – assets (NLS), liquidity (CPS) • Wage experience is statisticaly insignificent • Individuals with low wages are more likely to switch • Individuals with longer job tenure are less likely to switch into self-employment • Individuals who have changed job frequently are more likely to switch

  16. Entering self-employmet • The individuals who have had prior self-employment experience are more likely to switch • The effect of previuos unemployment is not consistent • 1980-1981 positive and significant • 1976-1978 negative and insignificant • 1978-1980 negative and insignificant

  17. Entry and Exit - Conclusion • Entry is time homogenous • Exit decreases sharply with time • Workers with low wages and a history of instability are more likely to switch to self-employment holding assets and education constraints.

  18. III. Self Employment Selection and Earnings • Previous Works • Borjas and Bronars (1987) • Evans (1985) • Brock and Evans (1986) 1980 Census data • Rees and Shah (1985) U.K. data on small cross section • Blau (1985) Malaysian farmers Data

  19. Data problems of Previous works • No information on self-employment versus wage experiences 2. Sparse information on personal characteristics.

  20. NLS Data • Gives possibility to estimate a much more refined model and to investigate the effect of wage and self-employment experience on wage and self-employment earnings.

  21. Data • Consist 2,405 white man who were in the 1981 NLS survey. • A total of 272 individuals were deleted either because they held both wage and self-employment jobs or because information was inconsistent.

  22. Result of Probit Estimation Probability of being self-employed increases with • labor-market experience • Changing job frequently • Relatively more unemployment experience • More educated individuals in professional occupations • More internal locus of control • Having father manager

  23. Differences in Return • wage experience in self-employment (2.1%) • wage experience in wage work (5.6%) • Self-employment experience in self- employment (4.6%)

  24. Differences in Return • For professional workers the returns to education are higher in self-employment than in wage work • Unemployment experience carries larger penalty in self-employment than in wage work

  25. Interpretation of the Differences • Human-capital accumulated through wage work is less valuable in self-employment than wage work. • Individual who switch into self-employment later in their careers (and who have thereby accumulated more wage experience) are relatively poorer wage worker

  26. IV. Conclusions • Probability of entering self-employment is independent of age or experience for the first 20 years of employment But • Individuals face liquidity constraints and have to accumulate assets to start business. • Discovering a business opportunities takes time. Older people might be more likely to have identified an opportunity but less likely to choose to exploit it.

  27. IV. Conclusions Determinants of switching from wage work to self-employment • Relatively low wage. • Frequently changing jobs. • Frequently experiencing unemployment as wage workers. • More internal locus of control

  28. Questions, Comments….

More Related