390 likes | 586 Views
Collaborative Scholarship. Phyllis Gleason* * * * * * *Professor of Humanities. Jessie Klein* * * * * * *Professor of Science. Joan Kleinman* * * * * * *Professor of Computer Science. Middlesex Community CollegeBedford and Lowell, MA. Overview of Session. The Middlesex Carnegie Group as
E N D
2. Collaborative Scholarship Phyllis Gleason
* * * * * * *
Professor of Humanities
3. Overview of Session The Middlesex Carnegie Group as an example of a community of practice
Specific examples from 3 disciplines
Value of faculty involvement in the scholarship of teaching and learning
Questions
4. Middlesex Carnegie Group: A Community of Practice
began with Carnegie initiative in 1998
focuses on the scholarship of teaching and learning
involves 15 faculty from multiple disciplines who meet regularly to peer review, research and collaborate on presentations
5. Critical Ongoing Question We’re teaching
but are they learning?
Projects were an attempt to explore different pedagogies and to assess their impact on student learning.
6. INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS
7. Teaching and Learning OnlineComparison of In-class and Distance-LearningStudents’ Performance and Attitudes in an Introductory Computer Science Course Joan Kleinman
Professor of Computer Science
(781) 280 – 3979
kleinmanj@middlesex.cc.ma.us
8. History Course offered online since Spring 1998
Among first of online courses at Middlesex
Formerly used FirstClass but implemented in Blackboard in Spring 2002
9. Introduction to Computer Science Beginning level programming (Visual BASIC)
Required for Computer Science majors with no programming experience; elective for others
Satisfies 3 core intensives (required for graduation for all Middlesex students)
Computer literacy
Writing
Impact of Technology
10. Course Mechanics Assignments in textbook or from instructor
Materials sent
as powerpoint and word documents
as Visual Basic programs
in e-mail messages
on web site
Homework submitted in word documents and as zipped Visual Basic programs
11. Methodology Fall 1999 – taught two sections, one in-class and one online
Compared demographics of two groups
Examined initial attitudes, preparation for course, expectations for course
Examined success in course and satisfaction with course
12. Comparison of Mean Responses to Questionnaire Items for In-class and Online Students
13. Comparison of Mean Responses to Questionnaire Items for In-class and Online Students
14. Grade Distribution
15. Background - Findings Approximately same
gender
workload
Little but no significance in number of credits and prior computer experience
Significant difference in age- online students older
16. Student Expectations Same in
expected grade
expected amount of work
Online students more confident
17. Outcomes Online class had larger initial dropout rate
most likely due to technology hurdle
No significant difference in grades
Online students were
slightly more positive about their learning
more willing to recommend the course
significantly more positive in their overall rating of course
18. Student Challenges Must be disciplined and very patient
Must jump technology hurdle
Must be proactive, engaged
Must deal with overwhelming amount of material in first week of course
19. Faculty Challenges Logistics
need to be very organized
more time to “view”/assess homework
On call 24/7
Pressure of immediate response
No external delimiters (like end of class)
Clarity of Communication
compensate for loss of gestural and tonal clues
desire to convey sense of instructor’s personality
20. Faculty Challenges Harder to monitor individual progress
Keeping everyone together
Fostering communication among students
21. Unexpected Outcomes More individualized communication
Increased role as course designer- less as “presenter” of information
Pay more attention to clarity of communications and thoroughness of course materials
22. Support is Critical Support of College is essential for course viability
Technical assistance to students AND faculty must be immediate and superior
Support must be consistent.
Technical help is critical factor especially at beginning of semester
23. Using Case Studies Engages General Biology Students
24. WHY USE CASES?
Relate material to real life
Use active learning as a supplement to lecture
Develop critical thinking skills
Improve group work skills
26. CASES FOR GENERAL BIOLOGY Should Bill Take “SAMe”? - Introduction to Chemistry
Lactose Intolerance - Sugars and Interpretation of Graphs
The Endomembrane System - Cell Structures
What's a GMO? – Pro/Con Paper and Discussion
30. The Use Of Media Can Enhance Students’ Intrinsic Motivation