1 / 5

Construct Validity

Construct Validity. PUSH. CONSTRUCT VALIDITY Factor analysis: Bivariate correlations. CONSTRUCT VALIDITY Factor analysis (Principal component analysis). Best solution = 8 factors Practice Improvement Learning* Reassurance, Confirmation Recall Frustration not enough info

anika
Download Presentation

Construct Validity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Construct Validity PUSH

  2. CONSTRUCT VALIDITYFactor analysis: Bivariate correlations

  3. CONSTRUCT VALIDITYFactor analysis (Principal component analysis) • Best solution = 8 factors • Practice Improvement • Learning* • Reassurance, Confirmation • Recall • Frustration not enough info • Frustration too much info • Disagree • Harmful Total variance explained = 89.8% *No impact

  4. CONSTRUCT VALIDITYMultilevel Factor Analysis • Accounting for dependence due to multiple ratings for each InfoPOEM • Best solution = 9 factors • Practice Improvement • Learning • Reassurance • Confirmation • Recall • Frustration not enough info • Frustration too much info • Disagree • Harmful • Accounting for dependence due to multiple ratings from each participant • Best solution = 8 factors • Practice Improvement • Learning • Reassurance, Confirmation • Recall • Frustration not enough info • Frustration too much info • Disagree • Harmful Total variance explained = 90.0% Total variance explained = 97.5%

  5. Results - Summary • Use of the method is good • The ten most frequent impact patterns account for 89% of all reports of ‘cognitive impact’ • An eight factor solution explains 90% of total variance, and is a good fit for the data

More Related